These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16139924)

  • 1. The public and public health organizations: issues for community engagement in public health.
    Scutchfield FD; Hall L; Ireson CL
    Health Policy; 2006 Jun; 77(1):76-85. PubMed ID: 16139924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effectiveness of public deliberation methods for gathering input on issues in healthcare: Results from a randomized trial.
    Carman KL; Mallery C; Maurer M; Wang G; Garfinkel S; Yang M; Gilmore D; Windham A; Ginsburg M; Sofaer S; Gold M; Pathak-Sen E; Davies T; Siegel J; Mangrum R; Fernandez J; Richmond J; Fishkin J; Siu Chao A
    Soc Sci Med; 2015 May; 133():11-20. PubMed ID: 25828260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Deliberation: obtaining informed input from a diverse public.
    Wang G; Gold M; Siegel J; Sofaer S; Yang M; Mallery C; Carman KL
    J Health Care Poor Underserved; 2015 Feb; 26(1):223-42. PubMed ID: 25702739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Brookings supports breastfeeding: using public deliberation as a community-engaged approach to dissemination of research.
    Anderson J; Kuehl RA; Mehltretter Drury SA; Tschetter L; Schwaegerl M; Yoder J; Gullickson H; Lamp J; Bachman C; Hildreth M
    Transl Behav Med; 2017 Dec; 7(4):783-792. PubMed ID: 28290143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The voice of the public in public health policy and planning: the role of public judgment.
    Scutchfield FD; Ireson C; Hall L
    J Public Health Policy; 2004; 25(2):197-205; discussion 206-10. PubMed ID: 15255385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Which public and why deliberate?--A scoping review of public deliberation in public health and health policy research.
    Degeling C; Carter SM; Rychetnik L
    Soc Sci Med; 2015 Apr; 131():114-21. PubMed ID: 25770463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Public Mistrust of the U.S. Health Care System's Profit Motives: Mixed-Methods Results from a Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Richmond J; Powell W; Maurer M; Mangrum R; Gold MR; Pathak-Sen E; Yang M; Carman KL
    J Gen Intern Med; 2017 Dec; 32(12):1396-1402. PubMed ID: 28875447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Engaging the public on biobanks: outcomes of the BC biobank deliberation.
    O'Doherty KC; Burgess MM
    Public Health Genomics; 2009; 12(4):203-15. PubMed ID: 19367089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Influencing health policy through public deliberation: Lessons learned from two decades of Citizens'/community juries.
    Degeling C; Rychetnik L; Street J; Thomas R; Carter SM
    Soc Sci Med; 2017 Apr; 179():166-171. PubMed ID: 28285232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Deliberations about deliberative methods: issues in the design and evaluation of public participation processes.
    Abelson J; Forest PG; Eyles J; Smith P; Martin E; Gauvin FP
    Soc Sci Med; 2003 Jul; 57(2):239-51. PubMed ID: 12765705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Biobanking, public consultation, and the discursive logics of deliberation: five lessons from British Columbia.
    Walmsley H
    Public Underst Sci; 2010 Jul; 19(4):452-68. PubMed ID: 20977183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Science and deliberation].
    Ravazzi S
    Epidemiol Prev; 2008; 32(6):319-24. PubMed ID: 19353967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A review of the Generic Design Assessment (GDA) Public Dialogue Pilot (2015) for new nuclear build in the UK: lessons for engagement theory and practice.
    Whitton J; Parry I; Grundy C; Lillycrop A; Ross D
    J Radiol Prot; 2016 Jun; 36(2):S23-44. PubMed ID: 27270243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Does deliberation make a difference? Results from a citizens panel study of health goals priority setting.
    Abelson J; Eyles J; McLeod CB; Collins P; McMullan C; Forest PG
    Health Policy; 2003 Oct; 66(1):95-106. PubMed ID: 14499168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Community Priorities for Hospital-Based Prevention Initiatives: Results From a Deliberating Public.
    Gold MR; Realmuto L; Scherer M; Kamler A; Weiss L
    J Public Health Manag Pract; 2018; 24(4):318-325. PubMed ID: 28650413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Using deliberative methods to establish a sufficient state of capability well-being for use in decision-making in the contexts of public health and social care.
    Kinghorn P
    Soc Sci Med; 2019 Nov; 240():112546. PubMed ID: 31563761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Partner's engagement in community-based health promotion programs: a case study of professional partner's experiences and perspectives in Iran.
    Bahraminejad N; Ibrahim F; Riji HM; Majdzadeh R; Hamzah A; Keshavarz Mohammadi N
    Health Promot Int; 2015 Dec; 30(4):963-75. PubMed ID: 24934454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The healthy people initiative: understanding the user's perspective.
    Benz J; Blakey C; Oppenheimer CC; Scherer H; Robinson WT
    J Public Health Manag Pract; 2013; 19(2):103-9. PubMed ID: 23358287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Promoting Evidence-Based Decision Making in a Local Health Department, Pueblo City-County, Colorado.
    Hardy AK; Nevin-Woods C; Proud S; Brownson RC
    Prev Chronic Dis; 2015 Jun; 12():E100. PubMed ID: 26111156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An Australian approach to the policy translation of deliberated citizen perspectives on biobanking.
    Molster C; Maxwell S; Youngs L; Potts A; Kyne G; Hope F; Dawkins H; O'Leary P
    Public Health Genomics; 2012; 15(2):82-91. PubMed ID: 22179074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.