These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

300 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16140164)

  • 1. Differential contributions of hippocampus, amygdala and perirhinal cortex to recognition of novel objects, contextual stimuli and stimulus relationships.
    Moses SN; Cole C; Driscoll I; Ryan JD
    Brain Res Bull; 2005 Sep; 67(1-2):62-76. PubMed ID: 16140164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Encoding of novel picture pairs activates the perirhinal cortex: an fMRI study.
    Pihlajamäki M; Tanila H; Hänninen T; Könönen M; Mikkonen M; Jalkanen V; Partanen K; Aronen HJ; Soininen H
    Hippocampus; 2003; 13(1):67-80. PubMed ID: 12625459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Impaired associative memory in temporal lobe epilepsy subjects after lesions of hippocampus, parahippocampal gyrus, and amygdala.
    Weniger G; Boucsein K; Irle E
    Hippocampus; 2004; 14(6):785-96. PubMed ID: 15318335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Relational memory for object identity and spatial location in rats with lesions of perirhinal cortex, amygdala and hippocampus.
    Moses SN; Cole C; Ryan JD
    Brain Res Bull; 2005 May; 65(6):501-12. PubMed ID: 15862922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Specialization in the medial temporal lobe for processing of objects and scenes.
    Lee AC; Buckley MJ; Pegman SJ; Spiers H; Scahill VL; Gaffan D; Bussey TJ; Davies RR; Kapur N; Hodges JR; Graham KS
    Hippocampus; 2005; 15(6):782-97. PubMed ID: 16010661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Novelty responses to relational and non-relational information in the hippocampus and the parahippocampal region: a comparison based on event-related fMRI.
    Köhler S; Danckert S; Gati JS; Menon RS
    Hippocampus; 2005; 15(6):763-74. PubMed ID: 15999342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Transitivity, flexibility, conjunctive representations, and the hippocampus. I. An empirical analysis.
    Van Elzakker M; O'Reilly RC; Rudy JW
    Hippocampus; 2003; 13(3):334-40. PubMed ID: 12722974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Amygdala input promotes spread of excitatory neural activity from perirhinal cortex to the entorhinal-hippocampal circuit.
    Kajiwara R; Takashima I; Mimura Y; Witter MP; Iijima T
    J Neurophysiol; 2003 Apr; 89(4):2176-84. PubMed ID: 12611981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Similar development of cued and learned home bases in control and hippocampal-damaged rats in an open field exploratory task.
    Lehmann H; Clark BJ; Whishaw IQ
    Hippocampus; 2007; 17(5):370-80. PubMed ID: 17372977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Hippocampal lesions that abolish spatial maze performance spare object recognition memory at delays of up to 48 hours.
    Forwood SE; Winters BD; Bussey TJ
    Hippocampus; 2005; 15(3):347-55. PubMed ID: 15558543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Hippocampal damage and exploratory preferences in rats: memory for objects, places, and contexts.
    Mumby DG; Gaskin S; Glenn MJ; Schramek TE; Lehmann H
    Learn Mem; 2002; 9(2):49-57. PubMed ID: 11992015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Retrograde and anterograde object recognition in rats with hippocampal lesions.
    Gaskin S; Tremblay A; Mumby DG
    Hippocampus; 2003; 13(8):962-9. PubMed ID: 14750658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Neonatal aspiration lesions of the hippocampal formation impair visual recognition memory when assessed by paired-comparison task but not by delayed nonmatching-to-sample task.
    Pascalis O; Bachevalier J
    Hippocampus; 1999; 9(6):609-16. PubMed ID: 10641753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Perirhinal and hippocampal contributions to visual recognition memory can be distinguished from those of occipito-temporal structures based on conscious awareness of prior occurrence.
    Danckert SL; Gati JS; Menon RS; Köhler S
    Hippocampus; 2007; 17(11):1081-92. PubMed ID: 17696171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Visual presentation of novel objects and new spatial arrangements of objects differentially activates the medial temporal lobe subareas in humans.
    Pihlajamäki M; Tanila H; Könönen M; Hänninen T; Hämäläinen A; Soininen H; Aronen HJ
    Eur J Neurosci; 2004 Apr; 19(7):1939-49. PubMed ID: 15078568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Enhanced context-dependency of object recognition in rats with hippocampal lesions.
    O'Brien N; Lehmann H; Lecluse V; Mumby DG
    Behav Brain Res; 2006 Jun; 170(1):156-62. PubMed ID: 16580742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Changes in NOS protein expression and activity in the rat hippocampus, entorhinal and postrhinal cortices after unilateral electrolytic perirhinal cortex lesions.
    Liu P; Zheng Y; Smith PF; Bilkey DK
    Hippocampus; 2003; 13(5):561-71. PubMed ID: 12921347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Projections from the periamygdaloid cortex to the amygdaloid complex, the hippocampal formation, and the parahippocampal region: a PHA-L study in the rat.
    Majak K; Pitkänen A
    Hippocampus; 2003; 13(8):922-42. PubMed ID: 14750655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A dissociation of dorso-lateral striatum and amygdala function on the same stimulus-response habit task.
    McDonald RJ; Hong NS
    Neuroscience; 2004; 124(3):507-13. PubMed ID: 14980722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Functional difference between rat perirhinal cortex and hippocampus in object and place discrimination tasks.
    Abe H; Ishida Y; Nonaka H; Iwasaki T
    Behav Brain Res; 2009 Feb; 197(2):388-97. PubMed ID: 18984009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.