These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
682 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16140815)
1. Measuring improvement following total hip and knee arthroplasty using patient-based measures of outcome. Marx RG; Jones EC; Atwan NC; Closkey RF; Salvati EA; Sculco TP J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2005 Sep; 87(9):1999-2005. PubMed ID: 16140815 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Sensitivity to Change of a Computer Adaptive Testing Instrument for Outcome Measurement After Hip and Knee Arthroplasty and Periacetabular Osteotomy. McDonough CM; Stoiber E; Tomek IM; Ni P; Kim YJ; Tian F; Jette AM J Orthop Sports Phys Ther; 2016 Sep; 46(9):756-67. PubMed ID: 27494055 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of short-term SF-36 results between total joint arthroplasty and cervical spine decompression and fusion or arthroplasty. Anderson PA; Puschak TJ; Sasso RC Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Jan; 34(2):176-83. PubMed ID: 19139668 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Measuring improvement following total hip and knee arthroplasty using the SF-36 Health Survey. Santić V; Legović D; Sestan B; Jurdana H; Marinović M Coll Antropol; 2012 Mar; 36(1):207-12. PubMed ID: 22816222 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparative outcomes of total hip and knee arthroplasty: a prospective cohort study. Hamilton D; Henderson GR; Gaston P; MacDonald D; Howie C; Simpson AH Postgrad Med J; 2012 Nov; 88(1045):627-31. PubMed ID: 22822221 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessment of health-related quality of life after surgical treatment of focal symptomatic spinal stenosis compared with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. Rampersaud YR; Ravi B; Lewis SJ; Stas V; Barron R; Davey R; Mahomed N Spine J; 2008; 8(2):296-304. PubMed ID: 17669690 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Ergometer cycling after hip or knee replacement surgery: a randomized controlled trial. Liebs TR; Herzberg W; Rüther W; Haasters J; Russlies M; Hassenpflug J J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2010 Apr; 92(4):814-22. PubMed ID: 20360503 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Modeling early recovery of physical function following hip and knee arthroplasty. Kennedy DM; Stratford PW; Hanna SE; Wessel J; Gollish JD BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2006 Dec; 7():100. PubMed ID: 17156487 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Relative effect per patient (REPP)--outcome groups for total hip replacement and total knee replacement]. Huber J; Dabis E; Zumstein MD; Hüsler J Z Orthop Unfall; 2013 Jun; 151(3):239-42. PubMed ID: 23696160 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The importance of patient expectations in predicting functional outcomes after total joint arthroplasty. Mahomed NN; Liang MH; Cook EF; Daltroy LH; Fortin PR; Fossel AH; Katz JN J Rheumatol; 2002 Jun; 29(6):1273-9. PubMed ID: 12064846 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The relationship between the American Society Of Anesthesiologists physical rating and outcome following total hip and knee arthroplasty: an analysis of theNew Zealand Joint Registry. Hooper GJ; Rothwell AG; Hooper NM; Frampton C J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2012 Jun; 94(12):1065-70. PubMed ID: 22717825 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Inpatient compared with home-based rehabilitation following primary unilateral total hip or knee replacement: a randomized controlled trial. Mahomed NN; Davis AM; Hawker G; Badley E; Davey JR; Syed KA; Coyte PC; Gandhi R; Wright JG J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2008 Aug; 90(8):1673-80. PubMed ID: 18676897 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Results of total joint arthroplasty and joint preserving surgery in younger patients evaluated by alternative outcome measures. Klit J Dan Med J; 2014 Apr; 61(4):B4836. PubMed ID: 24814600 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Joint perception after hip or knee replacement surgery. Collins M; Lavigne M; Girard J; Vendittoli PA Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2012 May; 98(3):275-80. PubMed ID: 22459101 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Patient perspective survey of total hip vs total knee arthroplasty surgery. de Beer J; Petruccelli D; Adili A; Piccirillo L; Wismer D; Winemaker M J Arthroplasty; 2012 Jun; 27(6):865-9.e1-5. PubMed ID: 22333864 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A longitudinal study of quality of life and functional status in total hip and total knee replacement patients. Mandzuk LL; McMillan DE; Bohm ER Int J Orthop Trauma Nurs; 2015 May; 19(2):102-13. PubMed ID: 25846223 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Limitations of the Knee Society Score in evaluating outcomes following revision total knee arthroplasty. Ghanem E; Pawasarat I; Lindsay A; May L; Azzam K; Joshi A; Parvizi J J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2010 Oct; 92(14):2445-51. PubMed ID: 20962195 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Validity and responsiveness of the Knee Society Clinical Rating System in comparison with the SF-36 and WOMAC. Lingard EA; Katz JN; Wright RJ; Wright EA; Sledge CB; J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2001 Dec; 83(12):1856-64. PubMed ID: 11741066 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Physical activity after total joint replacement: a cross-sectional survey. Bauman S; Williams D; Petruccelli D; Elliott W; de Beer J Clin J Sport Med; 2007 Mar; 17(2):104-8. PubMed ID: 17414477 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparative effectiveness of alternative clinical pathways for primary hip and knee joint replacement patients: a pragmatic randomized, controlled trial. Gooch K; Marshall DA; Faris PD; Khong H; Wasylak T; Pearce T; Johnston DW; Arnett G; Hibbert J; Beaupre LA; Zernicke RF; Frank C Osteoarthritis Cartilage; 2012 Oct; 20(10):1086-94. PubMed ID: 22796513 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]