These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

215 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16141160)

  • 1. Analysis of quality of interventions in systematic reviews.
    Herbert RD; Bø K
    BMJ; 2005 Sep; 331(7515):507-9. PubMed ID: 16141160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An analysis of systematic reviews indicated low incorpororation of results from clinical trial quality assessment.
    de Craen AJ; van Vliet HA; Helmerhorst FM
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2005 Mar; 58(3):311-3. PubMed ID: 15718121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
    Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
    Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Improving the quality of reporting in randomised controlled trials.
    Walker A; Nixon J
    J Wound Care; 2004 Mar; 13(3):103-6. PubMed ID: 15045804
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evidence-based reviews and meta-analysis.
    Evans J
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2010 May; 149(5):701-3. PubMed ID: 20399923
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Systematic review of the literature--an instrument to capture research results].
    Malmivaara A
    Duodecim; 2002; 118(9):877-9. PubMed ID: 12238165
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Limitations of randomized clinical trials in chronic diseases: explanations and recommendations.
    Pincus T
    Adv Mind Body Med; 2002; 18(2):14-21. PubMed ID: 12629874
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Deconstructing evidence in orthodontics: making sense of systematic reviews, randomized clinical trials, and meta-analyses.
    Rinchuse DJ; Rinchuse DJ; Kandasamy S; Ackerman MB
    World J Orthod; 2008; 9(2):167-76. PubMed ID: 18575311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Systematic reviews--triumph of form over substance?
    Thomas L; Wilson JA
    Clin Otolaryngol; 2006 Dec; 31(6):492-5. PubMed ID: 17184452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Many reviews are systematic but some are more transparent and completely reported than others.
    PLoS Medicine Editors
    PLoS Med; 2007 Mar; 4(3):e147. PubMed ID: 17388685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Commentary: Systematic reviewers face challenges from varied study designs.
    Altman DG
    BMJ; 2002 Aug; 325(7362):461. PubMed ID: 12211227
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Randomized trials, systematic reviews, meta-analyses: basic criteria in the world of scientific evidence].
    Purgato M; Cipriani A; Barbui C
    Riv Psichiatr; 2012; 47(1):21-9. PubMed ID: 22358214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. CONSORT and QUOROM guidelines for reporting randomized clinical trials and systematic reviews.
    Turpin DL
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Dec; 128(6):681-5; discussion 686. PubMed ID: 16360902
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The evidence for nursing interventions in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.
    Mistiaen P; Poot E; Hickox S; Wagner C
    Nurse Res; 2004; 12(2):71-80. PubMed ID: 15636007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Cochrane Collaboration - how is it progressing?
    Laupacis A
    Stat Med; 2002 Oct; 21(19):2815-22. PubMed ID: 12325097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Understanding research: 1. Methodologies used to answer research questions.
    Baxter H
    J Wound Care; 2001 Jul; 10(7):269-72. PubMed ID: 12964346
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evidence-based periodontology, systematic reviews and research quality.
    Needleman I; Moles DR; Worthington H
    Periodontol 2000; 2005; 37():12-28. PubMed ID: 15655022
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses: an illustrated, step-by-step guide.
    Pai M; McCulloch M; Gorman JD; Pai N; Enanoria W; Kennedy G; Tharyan P; Colford JM
    Natl Med J India; 2004; 17(2):86-95. PubMed ID: 15141602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Measuring errors in neonatal randomized controlled trials. Deficient quality concerning the informed consent].
    Finnström O
    Lakartidningen; 2001 May; 98(20):2474-5. PubMed ID: 11433980
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Systematic reviews involving complementary and alternative medicine interventions had higher quality of reporting than conventional medicine reviews.
    Lawson ML; Pham B; Klassen TP; Moher D
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2005 Aug; 58(8):777-84. PubMed ID: 16018912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.