These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

208 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16141160)

  • 21. Systematic reviews--triumph of form over substance?
    Thomas L; Wilson JA
    Clin Otolaryngol; 2006 Dec; 31(6):492-5. PubMed ID: 17184452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Randomized clinical trials in medical rehabilitation research.
    Tate DG; Findley T; Dijkers M; Nobunaga AI; Karunas RB
    Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 1999; 78(5):486-99. PubMed ID: 10493460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Judging the 'weight of evidence' in systematic reviews: introducing rigour into the qualitative overview stage by assessing Signal and Noise.
    Edwards A; Elwyn G; Hood K; Rollnick S
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2000 May; 6(2):177-84. PubMed ID: 10970011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Innovations in data collection, management, and archiving for systematic reviews.
    Li T; Vedula SS; Hadar N; Parkin C; Lau J; Dickersin K
    Ann Intern Med; 2015 Feb; 162(4):287-94. PubMed ID: 25686168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. CONSORT and QUOROM guidelines for reporting randomized clinical trials and systematic reviews.
    Turpin DL
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Dec; 128(6):681-5; discussion 686. PubMed ID: 16360902
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [How to assess the quality of systematic review and meta-analysis].
    Zhang JH; Shang HC; Zhang BL
    Zhong Xi Yi Jie He Xue Bao; 2008 Apr; 6(4):337-40. PubMed ID: 18405597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Measuring errors in neonatal randomized controlled trials. Deficient quality concerning the informed consent].
    Finnström O
    Lakartidningen; 2001 May; 98(20):2474-5. PubMed ID: 11433980
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Can systematic reviews with sparse data be trusted?
    Afshari A; Wetterslev J; Smith AF
    Anaesthesia; 2017 Jan; 72(1):12-16. PubMed ID: 27804113
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The Cochrane Collaboration - how is it progressing?
    Laupacis A
    Stat Med; 2002 Oct; 21(19):2815-22. PubMed ID: 12325097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Association between bibliometric parameters, reporting and methodological quality of randomised controlled trials in vascular and endovascular surgery.
    Hajibandeh S; Hajibandeh S; Antoniou GA; Green PA; Maden M; Torella F
    Vascular; 2017 Apr; 25(2):196-207. PubMed ID: 27252347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A process for systematically reviewing the literature: providing the research evidence for public health nursing interventions.
    Thomas BH; Ciliska D; Dobbins M; Micucci S
    Worldviews Evid Based Nurs; 2004; 1(3):176-84. PubMed ID: 17163895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Randomized trials, systematic reviews, meta-analyses: basic criteria in the world of scientific evidence].
    Purgato M; Cipriani A; Barbui C
    Riv Psichiatr; 2012; 47(1):21-9. PubMed ID: 22358214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Reporting on quality of life in randomised controlled trials: bibliographic study.
    Sanders C; Egger M; Donovan J; Tallon D; Frankel S
    BMJ; 1998 Oct; 317(7167):1191-4. PubMed ID: 9794853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A nephrology guide to reading and using systematic reviews of randomized trials.
    Badve SV; Palmer SC; Johnson DW; Strippoli GF
    Nephrol Dial Transplant; 2015 Jun; 30(6):878-84. PubMed ID: 24957810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. An application of the mini review to a complex methodological question: how best to research public health nursing and service quality?
    Hanafin SS; Cowley S; Griffiths P
    Int J Nurs Stud; 2004 Sep; 41(7):799-811. PubMed ID: 15288802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The evidence for nursing interventions in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.
    Mistiaen P; Poot E; Hickox S; Wagner C
    Nurse Res; 2004; 12(2):71-80. PubMed ID: 15636007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Avoidable waste related to inadequate methods and incomplete reporting of interventions: a systematic review of randomized trials performed in Sub-Saharan Africa.
    Ndounga Diakou LA; Ntoumi F; Ravaud P; Boutron I
    Trials; 2017 Jul; 18(1):291. PubMed ID: 28676066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Suspected research fraud: difficulties of getting at the truth.
    White C
    BMJ; 2005 Jul; 331(7511):281-8. PubMed ID: 16052022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. What is the quality of the orthopaedic literature?
    Mundi R; Chaudhry H; Sharma R; Schemitsch E; Bhandari M
    J Long Term Eff Med Implants; 2007; 17(2):103-9. PubMed ID: 18540853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Evidence-based periodontology, systematic reviews and research quality.
    Needleman I; Moles DR; Worthington H
    Periodontol 2000; 2005; 37():12-28. PubMed ID: 15655022
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.