338 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16141814)
1. Cohesive silicone gel breast implants in aesthetic and reconstructive breast surgery.
Brown MH; Shenker R; Silver SA
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2005 Sep; 116(3):768-79; discussion 780-1. PubMed ID: 16141814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Subglandular breast augmentation with textured, anatomic, cohesive silicone implants: a review of 440 consecutive patients.
Lista F; Tutino R; Khan A; Ahmad J
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2013 Aug; 132(2):295-303. PubMed ID: 23584627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Soft cohesive silicone gel breast prostheses: a comparative prospective study of aesthetic results versus lower cohesivity silicone gel prostheses.
Panettiere P; Marchetti L; Accorsi D
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2007; 60(5):482-9. PubMed ID: 17399656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prospective study comparing two brands of cohesive gel breast implants with anatomic shape: 5-year follow-up evaluation.
Niechajev I; Jurell G; Lohjelm L
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2007; 31(6):697-710. PubMed ID: 17653683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Primary breast augmentation clinical trial outcomes stratified by surgical incision, anatomical placement and implant device type.
Namnoum JD; Largent J; Kaplan HM; Oefelein MG; Brown MH
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2013 Sep; 66(9):1165-72. PubMed ID: 23664574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of Allergan, Mentor, and Sientra Contoured Cohesive Gel Breast Implants: A Single Surgeon's 10-Year Experience.
Doren EL; Pierpont YN; Shivers SC; Berger LH
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2015 Nov; 136(5):957-966. PubMed ID: 26505700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. PERTHESE implant-identical cohesive-gel sizers in breast augmentation: a prospective report on 200 consecutive cases and implications for treatment of breast asymmetry.
Gore SM; Lamberty BG
Aesthet Surg J; 2012 Mar; 32(3):310-8. PubMed ID: 22301618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Allergan Style 410 Implants for Breast Reconstruction: A Prospective Study in Efficacy, Safety, and Symmetry.
Unger JG; Carreras JM; Nagarkar P; Jeong HS; Carpenter W
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2016 Sep; 138(3):548-555. PubMed ID: 27127834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinical experience with a fourth-generation textured silicone gel breast implant: a review of 1012 Mentor MemoryGel breast implants.
Stevens WG; Pacella SJ; Gear AJ; Freeman ME; McWhorter C; Tenenbaum MJ; Stoker DA
Aesthet Surg J; 2008; 28(6):642-7. PubMed ID: 19083592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Style 410 highly cohesive silicone breast implant core study results at 3 years.
Bengtson BP; Van Natta BW; Murphy DK; Slicton A; Maxwell GP;
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2007 Dec; 120(7 Suppl 1):40S-48S. PubMed ID: 18090813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Early experience with an anatomical soft cohesive silicone gel prosthesis in cosmetic and reconstructive breast implant surgery.
Fruhstorfer BH; Hodgson EL; Malata CM
Ann Plast Surg; 2004 Dec; 53(6):536-42. PubMed ID: 15602249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Breast implant complication review: double capsules and late seromas.
Hall-Findlay EJ
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2011 Jan; 127(1):56-66. PubMed ID: 21200201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Tradeoffs in Implant Selection for Reconstructive Surgery and Adjuncts Utilized to Maximize Aesthetic Outcomes.
Unger JG; Keller PR
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2019 Jul; 144(1S Utilizing a Spectrum of Cohesive Implants in Aesthetic and Reconstructive Breast Surgery):51S-59S. PubMed ID: 31246761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A review of the use of silicone implants in breast surgery.
Chao AH; Garza R; Povoski SP
Expert Rev Med Devices; 2016; 13(2):143-56. PubMed ID: 26690709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Algorithm and techniques for using Sientra's highly cohesive shaped silicone gel implants in primary and revision breast reconstruction.
Nahabedian MY
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2014 Jul; 134(1 Suppl):28S-37S. PubMed ID: 25057746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Breast implant stability in the subfascial plane and the new shaped silicone gel breast implants.
Sampaio Góes JC
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2010 Feb; 34(1):23-28. PubMed ID: 19936826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Breast augmentation with extra-projected and high-cohesive Dual-Gel Prosthesis 510: a prospective study of 75 consecutive cases for a new method (the Zenith system).
Riggio E
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2012 Aug; 36(4):866-78. PubMed ID: 22484397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Mentor Contour Profile Gel Implants: Clinical Outcomes at 10 Years.
Hammond DC; Canady JW; Love TR; Wixtrom RN; Caplin DA
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2017 Dec; 140(6):1142-1150. PubMed ID: 29176413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Outcomes Utilizing Inspira Implants in Primary Aesthetic and Reconstructive Surgery.
Warren Peled A; Disa JJ
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2019 Jul; 144(1S Utilizing a Spectrum of Cohesive Implants in Aesthetic and Reconstructive Breast Surgery):60S-65S. PubMed ID: 31246762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Indications for extra full projection anatomical cohesive silicone gel implants in cosmetic and reconstructive breast surgery.
Mario AI; Molina AR; Malata CM
Ann Plast Surg; 2008 Dec; 61(6):607-12. PubMed ID: 19034073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
