BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

92 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16142457)

  • 1. [Objective assessment of cosmetic outcome of scars].
    Handschel JG; Depprich RA; Dirksen D; Runte C; Zimmermann A; Böröcz Z; Kübler NR
    Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir; 2005 Nov; 9(6):396-9. PubMed ID: 16142457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The challenge of objective scar colour assessment in a clinical setting: using digital photography.
    Anderson JC; Hallam MJ; Nduka C; Osorio D
    J Wound Care; 2015 Aug; 24(8):379-87. PubMed ID: 26562381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Early postoperative single treatment ablative fractional lasing of Mohs micrographic surgery facial scars: a split-scar, evaluator-blinded study.
    Sobanko JF; Vachiramon V; Rattanaumpawan P; Miller CJ
    Lasers Surg Med; 2015 Jan; 47(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 25559589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A new quantitative scale for clinical scar assessment.
    Beausang E; Floyd H; Dunn KW; Orton CI; Ferguson MW
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 1998 Nov; 102(6):1954-61. PubMed ID: 9810991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Visual assessment of linear scars: a new tool.
    Kerrigan CL; Homa K
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2009 Nov; 124(5):1513-1519. PubMed ID: 20009837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Digital imaging analysis of scar aesthetics.
    Valente JH; Jay GD; Schmidt ST; Oh AK; Reinert SE; Zabbo CP
    Adv Skin Wound Care; 2012 Mar; 25(3):119-23. PubMed ID: 22343599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The cosmetic outcome of external dacryocystorhinostomy scar and factors affecting it.
    Waly MA; Shalaby OE; Elbakary MA; Hashish AA
    Indian J Ophthalmol; 2016 Apr; 64(4):261-5. PubMed ID: 27221676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Development and validation of a novel scar evaluation scale.
    Singer AJ; Arora B; Dagum A; Valentine S; Hollander JE
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2007 Dec; 120(7):1892-1897. PubMed ID: 18090752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. New Atrophic Acne Scar Classification: Reliability of Assessments Based on Size, Shape, and Number.
    Kang S; Lozada VT; Bettoli V; Tan J; Rueda MJ; Layton A; Petit L; Dréno B
    J Drugs Dermatol; 2016 Jun; 15(6):693-702. PubMed ID: 27272075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Continuous versus interrupted sutures for facial surgery repair: a randomized prospective study.
    Blouin MM; Al Jasser M; Demanczuk A; Berkowitz J; Zloty D
    Dermatol Surg; 2015 Aug; 41(8):919-28. PubMed ID: 26218726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Treatment of surgical scars with nonablative fractional laser versus pulsed dye laser: a randomized controlled trial.
    Tierney E; Mahmoud BH; Srivastava D; Ozog D; Kouba DJ
    Dermatol Surg; 2009 Aug; 35(8):1172-80. PubMed ID: 19250300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reliability testing of a new scar assessment tool, Matching Assessment of Scars and Photographs (MAPS).
    Masters M; McMahon M; Svens B
    J Burn Care Rehabil; 2005; 26(3):273-84. PubMed ID: 15879752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The evaluation of a clinical scar scale for porcine burn scars.
    Wang XQ; Kravchuk O; Liu PY; Kempf M; Boogaard CV; Lau P; Cuttle L; Mill J; Kimble RM
    Burns; 2009 Jun; 35(4):538-46. PubMed ID: 19201543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Development of a new visual analogue scale for the assessment of area scars.
    Micomonaco DC; Fung K; Mount G; Franklin J; Yoo J; Brandt M; Moore CC; Doyle PC
    J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2009 Feb; 38(1):77-89. PubMed ID: 19344616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Scar Assessment After Breast Augmentation Surgery with Axillary Incision versus Inframammary Fold Incision: Long-Term Follow-Up in Chinese Patients.
    Sun J; Mu D; Liu C; Ji K; Chen L; Liu W; Luan J
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2016 Oct; 40(5):699-706. PubMed ID: 27484988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reliability and validity testing of the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale in evaluating linear scars after breast cancer surgery.
    Truong PT; Lee JC; Soer B; Gaul CA; Olivotto IA
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2007 Feb; 119(2):487-94. PubMed ID: 17230080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Successful treatment of atrophic postoperative and traumatic scarring with carbon dioxide ablative fractional resurfacing: quantitative volumetric scar improvement.
    Weiss ET; Chapas A; Brightman L; Hunzeker C; Hale EK; Karen JK; Bernstein L; Geronemus RG
    Arch Dermatol; 2010 Feb; 146(2):133-40. PubMed ID: 20157023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Optimal placement of a brachioplasty scar: a survey evaluation.
    Samra S; Samra F; Liu YJ; Sawh-Martinez R; Persing J
    Ann Plast Surg; 2013 Oct; 71(4):329-32. PubMed ID: 23407254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Early postoperative treatment of surgical scars using a fractional carbon dioxide laser: a split-scar, evaluator-blinded study.
    Lee SH; Zheng Z; Roh MR
    Dermatol Surg; 2013 Aug; 39(8):1190-6. PubMed ID: 23631513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Towards quantifying the aesthetic outcomes of breast cancer treatment: comparison of clinical photography and colorimetry.
    Kim MS; Rodney WN; Cooper T; Kite C; Reece GP; Markey MK
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2009 Feb; 15(1):20-31. PubMed ID: 19239578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.