92 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16142457)
21. Improving the appearance of pin-site scars.
Saleh M; Howard AC
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 1994 Nov; 76(6):906-8. PubMed ID: 7983116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Objective and quantitative evaluation of scar color using the L*a*b* color coordinates.
Cheon YW; Lee WJ; Rah DK
J Craniofac Surg; 2010 May; 21(3):679-84. PubMed ID: 20485028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Changes in subjective vs objective burn scar assessment over time: does the patient agree with what we think?
Martin D; Umraw N; Gomez M; Cartotto R
J Burn Care Rehabil; 2003; 24(4):239-44; discussion 238. PubMed ID: 14501421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Association between peridural scar and recurrent radicular pain after lumbar discectomy: magnetic resonance evaluation. ADCON-L European Study Group.
Ross JS; Robertson JT; Frederickson RC; Petrie JL; Obuchowski N; Modic MT; deTribolet N
Neurosurgery; 1996 Apr; 38(4):855-61; discussion 861-3. PubMed ID: 8692415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Outcomes of Cutaneous Scar Revision During Surgical Implant Removal in Children with Cerebral Palsy.
Davids JR; Diaz K; Leba TB; Adams S; Westberry DE; Bagley AM
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2016 Aug; 98(16):1351-8. PubMed ID: 27535437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Colour evaluation in scars: tristimulus colorimeter, narrow-band simple reflectance meter or subjective evaluation?
Draaijers LJ; Tempelman FR; Botman YA; Kreis RW; Middelkoop E; van Zuijlen PP
Burns; 2004 Mar; 30(2):103-7. PubMed ID: 15019115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Clinimetric properties and clinical utility in rehabilitation of postsurgical scar rating scales: a systematic review.
Vercelli S; Ferriero G; Sartorio F; Cisari C; Bravini E
Int J Rehabil Res; 2015 Dec; 38(4):279-86. PubMed ID: 26426285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Prospective analysis of clinical evaluation and self-assessment by patients after decompression surgery for degenerative lumbar canal stenosis.
Haro H; Maekawa S; Hamada Y
Spine J; 2008; 8(2):380-4. PubMed ID: 17433781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. A practical and objective approach to scar colour assessment.
Hallam MJ; McNaught K; Thomas AN; Nduka C
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2013 Oct; 66(10):e271-6. PubMed ID: 23880014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. A comparative cross-sectional study on cosmetic outcomes after single port or conventional laparoscopic surgery.
Eom JM; Ko JH; Choi JS; Hong JH; Lee JH
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2013 Mar; 167(1):104-9. PubMed ID: 23265299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. How to assess scar hypertrophy--a comparison of subjective scales and Spectrocutometry: a new objective method.
Kaartinen IS; Välisuo PO; Bochko V; Alander JT; Kuokkanen HO
Wound Repair Regen; 2011; 19(3):316-23. PubMed ID: 21518084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Reliability of the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale and a 4-point scale in evaluating linear facial surgical scars.
Liu X; Nelemans PJ; Van Winden M; Kelleners-Smeets NW; Mosterd K
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol; 2017 Feb; 31(2):341-346. PubMed ID: 27439316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Applying a Visual Assessment Tool to Facial Linear Scars.
Collins LK; Knackstedt TJ; Ganger P; Scherer E; Samie FH
Facial Plast Surg; 2017 Feb; 33(1):97-101. PubMed ID: 28226377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Aesthetic effect of silicone gel on surgical scars in Asians.
Rhee SH; Koh SH; Lee DW; Park BY; Kim YO
J Craniofac Surg; 2010 May; 21(3):706-10. PubMed ID: 20485033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. A split-face comparative study to evaluate efficacy of combined subcision and dermaroller against combined subcision and cryoroller in treatment of acne scars.
Gadkari R; Nayak C
J Cosmet Dermatol; 2014 Mar; 13(1):38-43. PubMed ID: 24641604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Evaluation of the scars' vascularization using computer processing of the digital images.
Teplyi V; Grebchenko K
Skin Res Technol; 2019 Mar; 25(2):194-199. PubMed ID: 30328632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. [An attempt at objective assessment of cosmetic damage. Application to several cases of facial scars].
Danon J; Jost G; Laval R; Mahé E; Meresse B; Oulié J; Pollet J; Robin JL
Ann Chir Plast; 1972; 17(3):155-63. PubMed ID: 5079322
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. 1550-nm nonablative laser resurfacing for facial surgical scars.
Pham AM; Greene RM; Woolery-Lloyd H; Kaufman J; Grunebaum LD
Arch Facial Plast Surg; 2011; 13(3):203-10. PubMed ID: 21576668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The Scarbase Duo(®): Intra-rater and inter-rater reliability and validity of a compact dual scar assessment tool.
Fell M; Meirte J; Anthonissen M; Maertens K; Pleat J; Moortgat P
Burns; 2016 Mar; 42(2):336-44. PubMed ID: 26774602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Subcision for treatment of rolling acne scars in Iraqi patients: a clinical study.
Al-Dhalimi MA; Arnoos AA
J Cosmet Dermatol; 2012 Jun; 11(2):144-50. PubMed ID: 22672279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
