333 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16142765)
1. Split treatment of photodamaged skin with KTP 532 nm laser with 10 mm handpiece versus IPL: a cheek-to-cheek comparison.
Butler EG; McClellan SD; Ross EV
Lasers Surg Med; 2006 Feb; 38(2):124-8. PubMed ID: 16142765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Split-face treatment of facial dyschromia: pulsed dye laser with a compression handpiece versus intense pulsed light.
Galeckas KJ; Collins M; Ross EV; Uebelhoer NS
Dermatol Surg; 2008 May; 34(5):672-80. PubMed ID: 18318731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Long-pulsed dye laser versus intense pulsed light for photodamaged skin: a randomized split-face trial with blinded response evaluation.
Jørgensen GF; Hedelund L; Haedersdal M
Lasers Surg Med; 2008 Jul; 40(5):293-9. PubMed ID: 18563775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A newly modified 595-nm pulsed dye laser with compression handpiece for the treatment of photodamaged skin.
Kauvar AN; Rosen N; Khrom T
Lasers Surg Med; 2006 Oct; 38(9):808-13. PubMed ID: 16998912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A split-face comparison study of pulsed 532-nm KTP laser and 595-nm pulsed dye laser in the treatment of facial telangiectasias and diffuse telangiectatic facial erythema.
Uebelhoer NS; Bogle MA; Stewart B; Arndt KA; Dover JS
Dermatol Surg; 2007 Apr; 33(4):441-8. PubMed ID: 17430378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Combination 532-nm and 1064-nm lasers for noninvasive skin rejuvenation and toning.
Lee MW
Arch Dermatol; 2003 Oct; 139(10):1265-76. PubMed ID: 14568830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Intense pulsed light versus advanced fluorescent technology pulsed light for photodamaged skin: a split-face pilot comparison.
Braun M
J Drugs Dermatol; 2007 Oct; 6(10):1024-8. PubMed ID: 17966180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Use of light-emitting diode photomodulation to reduce erythema and discomfort after intense pulsed light treatment of photodamage.
Khoury JG; Goldman MP
J Cosmet Dermatol; 2008 Mar; 7(1):30-4. PubMed ID: 18254808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Ablative versus non-ablative treatment of perioral rhytides. A randomized controlled trial with long-term blinded clinical evaluations and non-invasive measurements.
Hedelund L; Bjerring P; Egekvist H; Haedersdal M
Lasers Surg Med; 2006 Feb; 38(2):129-36. PubMed ID: 16392145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparison of Q-switched alexandrite laser and intense pulsed light for the treatment of freckles and lentigines in Asian persons: a randomized, physician-blinded, split-face comparative trial.
Wang CC; Sue YM; Yang CH; Chen CK
J Am Acad Dermatol; 2006 May; 54(5):804-10. PubMed ID: 16635661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison study of intense pulsed light versus a long-pulse pulsed dye laser in the treatment of facial skin rejuvenation.
Kono T; Groff WF; Sakurai H; Takeuchi M; Yamaki T; Soejima K; Nozaki M
Ann Plast Surg; 2007 Nov; 59(5):479-83. PubMed ID: 17992138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of intense pulsed light to 595-nm long-pulsed pulsed dye laser for treatment of hypertrophic surgical scars: a pilot study.
Bellew SG; Weiss MA; Weiss RA
J Drugs Dermatol; 2005; 4(4):448-52. PubMed ID: 16004017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Topical 5-aminolevulinic acid combined with intense pulsed light in the treatment of photoaging.
Dover JS; Bhatia AC; Stewart B; Arndt KA
Arch Dermatol; 2005 Oct; 141(10):1247-52. PubMed ID: 16230562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Nd:YAG laser combined with IPL treatment improves clinical results in non-ablative photorejuvenation.
Trelles M; Allones I; Vélez M; Mordon S
J Cosmet Laser Ther; 2004 Jun; 6(2):69-78. PubMed ID: 15203996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of electrodesiccation and potassium-titanyl-phosphate laser for treatment of dermatosis papulosa nigra.
Kundu RV; Joshi SS; Suh KY; Boone SL; Huggins RH; Alam M; White L; Rademaker AW; West DP; Yoo S
Dermatol Surg; 2009 Jul; 35(7):1079-83. PubMed ID: 19469798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Split-face comparison of photodynamic therapy with 5-aminolevulinic acid and intense pulsed light versus intense pulsed light alone for photodamage.
Gold MH; Bradshaw VL; Boring MM; Bridges TM; Biron JA
Dermatol Surg; 2006 Jun; 32(6):795-801; discussion 801-3. PubMed ID: 16792644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Treatment of poikiloderma of Civatte using intense pulsed light source: 7 years of experience.
Rusciani A; Motta A; Fino P; Menichini G
Dermatol Surg; 2008 Mar; 34(3):314-9; discussion 319. PubMed ID: 18177401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reduction of pain and side effects in the treatment of solar lentigines with pneumatic skin flattening (PSF).
Fournier N; Elman M
J Cosmet Laser Ther; 2007 Sep; 9(3):167-72. PubMed ID: 17763026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Pulsed dye laser vs. intense pulsed light for port-wine stains: a randomized side-by-side trial with blinded response evaluation.
Faurschou A; Togsverd-Bo K; Zachariae C; Haedersdal M
Br J Dermatol; 2009 Feb; 160(2):359-64. PubMed ID: 19120324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Facial photo rejuvenation using two different intense pulsed light (IPL) wavelength bands.
Bjerring P; Christiansen K; Troilius A; Dierickx C
Lasers Surg Med; 2004; 34(2):120-6. PubMed ID: 15004823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
