These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16143559)

  • 1. Mechanical properties of the human uterine cervix: an in vivo study.
    Mazza E; Nava A; Bauer M; Winter R; Bajka M; Holzapfel GA
    Med Image Anal; 2006 Apr; 10(2):125-36. PubMed ID: 16143559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. In vivo characterization of the mechanics of human uterine cervices.
    Bauer M; Mazza E; Nava A; Zeck W; Eder M; Bajka M; Cacho F; Lang U; Holzapfel GA
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2007 Apr; 1101():186-202. PubMed ID: 17363446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessment of the in vivo biomechanical properties of the human uterine cervix in pregnancy using the aspiration test: a feasibility study.
    Bauer M; Mazza E; Jabareen M; Sultan L; Bajka M; Lang U; Zimmermann R; Holzapfel GA
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2009 May; 144 Suppl 1():S77-81. PubMed ID: 19285777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The mechanical response of human liver and its relation to histology: an in vivo study.
    Mazza E; Nava A; Hahnloser D; Jochum W; Bajka M
    Med Image Anal; 2007 Dec; 11(6):663-72. PubMed ID: 17719834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. In vivo mechanical characterization of human liver.
    Nava A; Mazza E; Furrer M; Villiger P; Reinhart WH
    Med Image Anal; 2008 Apr; 12(2):203-16. PubMed ID: 18171633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. In vivo mechanical behavior of intra-abdominal organs.
    Tay BK; Kim J; Srinivasan MA
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2006 Nov; 53(11):2129-38. PubMed ID: 17073317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. In vivo measurement of human brain elasticity using a light aspiration device.
    Schiavone P; Chassat F; Boudou T; Promayon E; Valdivia F; Payan Y
    Med Image Anal; 2009 Aug; 13(4):673-8. PubMed ID: 19409837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of dermal thickness, tissue composition, and body site on skin biomechanical properties.
    Smalls LK; Randall Wickett R; Visscher MO
    Skin Res Technol; 2006 Feb; 12(1):43-9. PubMed ID: 16420538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dynamic measurement of soft tissue viscoelastic properties with a torsional resonator device.
    Valtorta D; Mazza E
    Med Image Anal; 2005 Oct; 9(5):481-90. PubMed ID: 16006169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dual cryogenic fixation for mechanical testing of soft musculoskeletal tissues.
    Ramachandran N; Koike Y; Poitras P; Backman D; Uhthoff HK; Trudel G
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2005 Oct; 52(10):1792-5. PubMed ID: 16235666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A nonlinear elastic behavior to identify the mechanical parameters of human skin in vivo.
    Delalleau A; Josse G; Lagarde JM; Zahouani H; Bergheau JM
    Skin Res Technol; 2008 May; 14(2):152-64. PubMed ID: 18412557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Measurement of the mechanical properties of the skin using the suction test.
    Khatyr F; Imberdis C; Varchon D; Lagarde JM; Josse G
    Skin Res Technol; 2006 Feb; 12(1):24-31. PubMed ID: 16420535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An integrated system for real-time detection of stiff masses with a single compression.
    Fahmy AS; Krieger A; Osman NF
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2006 Jul; 53(7):1286-93. PubMed ID: 16830933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Passive mechanical properties of large intestine under in vivo and in vitro compression.
    Higa M; Luo Y; Okuyama T; Takagi T; Shiraishi Y; Yambe T
    Med Eng Phys; 2007 Oct; 29(8):840-4. PubMed ID: 17067843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Mechanical characterization of anisotropic planar biological soft tissues using large indentation: a computational feasibility study.
    Cox MA; Driessen NJ; Bouten CV; Baaijens FP
    J Biomech Eng; 2006 Jun; 128(3):428-36. PubMed ID: 16706592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. In vivo mechanical properties of thoracic aortic aneurysmal wall estimated from in vitro biaxial tensile test.
    Fukui T; Matsumoto T; Tanaka T; Ohashi T; Kumagai K; Akimoto H; Tabayashi K; Sato M
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2005; 15(4):295-305. PubMed ID: 16010038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An automated system for measuring multi-dimensional, time dependent mechanical properties of a human tibial fracture.
    Ogrodnik PJ; Moorcroft CI; Thomas PB
    Med Eng Phys; 2007 Dec; 29(10):1049-55. PubMed ID: 17875395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Understanding perceptual boundaries in laparoscopic surgery.
    Lamata P; Gomez EJ; Hernández FL; Oltra Pastor A; Sanchez-Margallo FM; Del Pozo Guerrero F
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2008 Mar; 55(3):866-73. PubMed ID: 18334378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of human uterine cervical electrical impedance measurements derived using two tetrapolar probes of different sizes.
    Gandhi SV; Walker DC; Brown BH; Anumba DO
    Biomed Eng Online; 2006 Nov; 5():62. PubMed ID: 17125510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An efficient soft tissue characterization algorithm from in vivo indentation experiments for medical simulation.
    Kim J; Ahn B; De S; Srinivasan MA
    Int J Med Robot; 2008 Sep; 4(3):277-85. PubMed ID: 18727148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.