These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
520 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16143747)
1. Pressure-regulated volume control ventilation vs synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation for very low-birth-weight infants: a randomized controlled trial. D'Angio CT; Chess PR; Kovacs SJ; Sinkin RA; Phelps DL; Kendig JW; Myers GJ; Reubens L; Ryan RM Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med; 2005 Sep; 159(9):868-75. PubMed ID: 16143747 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Early high-frequency oscillatory ventilation versus synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation in very low birth weight infants: a pilot study of two ventilation protocols. Durand DJ; Asselin JM; Hudak ML; Aschner JL; McArtor RD; Cleary JP; VanMeurs KP; Stewart DL; Shoemaker CT; Wiswell TE; Courtney SE J Perinatol; 2001 Jun; 21(4):221-9. PubMed ID: 11533838 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Randomized, controlled trial comparing synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation and synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation plus pressure support in preterm infants. Reyes ZC; Claure N; Tauscher MK; D'Ugard C; Vanbuskirk S; Bancalari E Pediatrics; 2006 Oct; 118(4):1409-17. PubMed ID: 17015530 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A randomized trial of non-synchronized Nasopharyngeal Intermittent Mandatory Ventilation (nsNIMV) vs. Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (NCPAP) in the prevention of extubation failure in pre-term < 1,500 grams. Khorana M; Paradeevisut H; Sangtawesin V; Kanjanapatanakul W; Chotigeat U; Ayutthaya JK J Med Assoc Thai; 2008 Oct; 91 Suppl 3():S136-42. PubMed ID: 19253509 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. High-frequency oscillatory ventilation versus conventional mechanical ventilation for very-low-birth-weight infants. Courtney SE; Durand DJ; Asselin JM; Hudak ML; Aschner JL; Shoemaker CT; N Engl J Med; 2002 Aug; 347(9):643-52. PubMed ID: 12200551 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A prospective observational pilot study of synchronized nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (SNIPPV) as a primary mode of ventilation in infants > or = 28 weeks with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS). Santin R; Brodsky N; Bhandari V J Perinatol; 2004 Aug; 24(8):487-93. PubMed ID: 15141265 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. High-frequency jet ventilation in the early management of respiratory distress syndrome is associated with a greater risk for adverse outcomes. Wiswell TE; Graziani LJ; Kornhauser MS; Cullen J; Merton DA; McKee L; Spitzer AR Pediatrics; 1996 Dec; 98(6 Pt 1):1035-43. PubMed ID: 8951251 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A randomized controlled trial of synchronized nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation in RDS. Bhandari V; Gavino RG; Nedrelow JH; Pallela P; Salvador A; Ehrenkranz RA; Brodsky NL J Perinatol; 2007 Nov; 27(11):697-703. PubMed ID: 17703184 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Very early surfactant without mandatory ventilation in premature infants treated with early continuous positive airway pressure: a randomized, controlled trial. Rojas MA; Lozano JM; Rojas MX; Laughon M; Bose CL; Rondon MA; Charry L; Bastidas JA; Perez LA; Rojas C; Ovalle O; Celis LA; Garcia-Harker J; Jaramillo ML; Pediatrics; 2009 Jan; 123(1):137-42. PubMed ID: 19117872 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Volume targeted ventilation (volume guarantee) in the weaning phase of premature newborn infants. Scopesi F; Calevo MG; Rolfe P; Arioni C; Traggiai C; Risso FM; Serra G Pediatr Pulmonol; 2007 Oct; 42(10):864-70. PubMed ID: 17726708 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Is it safer to intubate premature infants in the delivery room? Aly H; Massaro AN; Patel K; El-Mohandes AA Pediatrics; 2005 Jun; 115(6):1660-5. PubMed ID: 15930230 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Bubble continuous positive airway pressure, a potentially better practice, reduces the use of mechanical ventilation among very low birth weight infants with respiratory distress syndrome. Nowadzky T; Pantoja A; Britton JR Pediatrics; 2009 Jun; 123(6):1534-40. PubMed ID: 19482765 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effects of synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation versus pressure support plus volume guarantee ventilation in the weaning phase of preterm infants*. Erdemir A; Kahramaner Z; Turkoglu E; Cosar H; Sutcuoglu S; Ozer EA Pediatr Crit Care Med; 2014 Mar; 15(3):236-41. PubMed ID: 24608494 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The sy-fi study: a randomized prospective trial of synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation versus a high-frequency flow interrupter in infants less than 1000 g. Craft AP; Bhandari V; Finer NN J Perinatol; 2003 Jan; 23(1):14-9. PubMed ID: 12556921 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of introduction of synchronized nasal intermittent positive-pressure ventilation in a neonatal intensive care unit on bronchopulmonary dysplasia and growth in preterm infants. Kulkarni A; Ehrenkranz RA; Bhandari V Am J Perinatol; 2006 May; 23(4):233-40. PubMed ID: 16625501 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect on respiratory function of pressure support ventilation versus synchronised intermittent mandatory ventilation in preterm infants. Migliori C; Cavazza A; Motta M; Chirico G Pediatr Pulmonol; 2003 May; 35(5):364-7. PubMed ID: 12687593 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of volume guarantee combined with assist/control vs synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation. Abubakar K; Keszler M J Perinatol; 2005 Oct; 25(10):638-42. PubMed ID: 16094389 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Is there an advantage of using pressure support ventilation with volume guarantee in the initial management of premature infants with respiratory distress syndrome? A pilot study. Nafday SM; Green RS; Lin J; Brion LP; Ochshorn I; Holzman IR J Perinatol; 2005 Mar; 25(3):193-7. PubMed ID: 15674409 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Neuromotor outcome at 2 years of very preterm infants who were treated with high-frequency oscillatory ventilation or conventional ventilation for neonatal respiratory distress syndrome. Truffert P; Paris-Llado J; Escande B; Magny JF; Cambonie G; Saliba E; Thiriez G; Zupan-Simunek V; Blanc T; Rozé JC; Bréart G; Moriette G Pediatrics; 2007 Apr; 119(4):e860-5. PubMed ID: 17339385 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]