205 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16144091)
1. Data disclosure and data sharing in scientific research.
Allison JR; Cooper WW
Account Res; 1992; 2(2):93-132. PubMed ID: 16144091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Proprietary rights and the norms of science in biotechnology research.
Eisenberg RS
Yale Law J; 1987 Dec; 97(2):177-231. PubMed ID: 11660398
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. A national survey of policies on disclosure of conflicts of interest in biomedical research.
McCrary SV; Anderson CB; Jakovljevic J; Khan T; McCullough LB; Wray NP; Brody BA
N Engl J Med; 2000 Nov; 343(22):1621-6. PubMed ID: 11096171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Sharing statistical data in the biomedical and health sciences: ethical, institutional, legal, and professional dimensions.
Fienberg SE
Annu Rev Public Health; 1994; 15():1-18. PubMed ID: 8054076
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Accountability in science and government: is access the answer?
Dresser R
Hastings Cent Rep; 2000; 30(3):29-30. PubMed ID: 10862368
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Misconduct and social control in science: issues, problems, solutions.
Fox MF; Braxton JM
J Higher Educ; 1994; 65(3):373-83. PubMed ID: 11653368
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Sharing scientific data I: new problems for IRBs.
Sieber JE
IRB; 1989; 11(6):4-7. PubMed ID: 11650286
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Subpoenas and science--when lawyers force their way into the laboratory.
Black B
N Engl J Med; 1997 Mar; 336(10):725-7. PubMed ID: 9041107
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. All above board: openness is the only option if science is to maintain its integrity.
New Sci; 2004 Mar 6-12; 181(2437):3. PubMed ID: 15139348
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Case vignette: to share or not to share.
Bersoff DN; Dawes RM
Ethics Behav; 1992; 2(4):311-7. PubMed ID: 11651616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Sharing scientific data II: normative issues.
Weil V; Hollander R
IRB; 1990; 12(2):7-8. PubMed ID: 11650369
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Ethical and legal risks associated with archival research.
Taube DO; Burkhardt S
Ethics Behav; 1997; 7(1):59-67. PubMed ID: 11654858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Accountability and transparency.
Leshner AI
Science; 2009 Apr; 324(5925):313. PubMed ID: 19372394
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Biodefense. U.S. agencies unveil plan for biosecurity peer review.
Couzin J
Science; 2004 Mar; 303(5664):1595. PubMed ID: 15016970
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Perspective: is NIH funding the "best science by the best scientists"? A critique of the NIH R01 research grant review policies.
Costello LC
Acad Med; 2010 May; 85(5):775-9. PubMed ID: 20520024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Scientific publishing. NIH proposes 6-month public access to papers.
Kaiser J
Science; 2004 Sep; 305(5690):1548. PubMed ID: 15361594
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Part III: meeting the challenge when data sharing is required.
de Wolf VA; Sieber JE; Steel PM; Zarate AO
IRB; 2006; 28(2):10-5. PubMed ID: 16770883
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. State funding and data disclosure.
Lancet; 1999 Mar; 353(9158):1027. PubMed ID: 10199342
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Issues related to the protection of human research participants.
Harrison L
J Neurosurg Nurs; 1993 Jun; 25(3):187-93. PubMed ID: 11660053
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Data-sharing and data-withholding in genetics and the life sciences: results of a national survey of technology transfer officers.
Campbell EG; Bendavid E
J Health Care Law Policy; 2003; 6(2):241-55. PubMed ID: 15017960
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]