120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16145719)
1. Why worry about awareness in choice problems? Econometric analysis of screening for cervical cancer.
Belkar R; Fiebig DG; Haas M; Viney R
Health Econ; 2006 Jan; 15(1):33-47. PubMed ID: 16145719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Knowledge, attitude and practice of cervical cancer screening among women attending gynecology clinics in a tertiary level medical care center in southeastern Nigeria.
Mbamara SU; Ikpeze OC; Okonkwo JE; Onyiaorah IV; Ukah CO
J Reprod Med; 2011; 56(11-12):491-6. PubMed ID: 22195332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Decisions about Pap tests: what influences women and providers?
Fiebig DG; Haas M; Hossain I; Street DJ; Viney R
Soc Sci Med; 2009 May; 68(10):1766-74. PubMed ID: 19339094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Attitudes and beliefs about cervical smear testing in ever-married Jordanian women.
Amarin ZO; Badria LF; Obeidat BR
East Mediterr Health J; 2008; 14(2):389-97. PubMed ID: 18561732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Screening for cervical cancer: will women accept less?
Sirovich BE; Woloshin S; Schwartz LM
Am J Med; 2005 Feb; 118(2):151-8. PubMed ID: 15694900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Increasing women's participation in Pap smear screening in Australia--how can we tell if the national policy is effective?
Shelley J; Street A
Aust Health Rev; 1992; 15(2):190-9. PubMed ID: 10119050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of cervical cancer screening program at a rural community of South Africa.
Hoque M; Hoque E; Kader SB
East Afr J Public Health; 2008 Aug; 5(2):111-6. PubMed ID: 19024420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Uptake of cervical cancer screening in The Netherlands is mainly influenced by women's beliefs about the screening and by the inviting organization.
Tacken MA; Braspenning JC; Hermens RP; Spreeuwenberg PM; van den Hoogen HJ; de Bakker DH; Groenewegen PP; Grol RP
Eur J Public Health; 2007 Apr; 17(2):178-85. PubMed ID: 16837520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. CAPRELA (Cancer Prevention for Latinas): findings of a pilot study in Winston-Salem, Forsyth County.
Koval AE; Riganti AA; Foley KL
N C Med J; 2006; 67(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 16550986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Encouraging the right women to attend for cervical cancer screening: results from a targeted television campaign in Victoria, Australia.
Mullins R; Wakefield M; Broun K
Health Educ Res; 2008 Jun; 23(3):477-86. PubMed ID: 17615181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Hispanic acculturation and utilization of cervical cancer screening in the US.
Shah M; Zhu K; Wu H; Potter J
Prev Med; 2006 Feb; 42(2):146-9. PubMed ID: 16297444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Report from the CDC. Pap test intervals used by physicians serving low-income women through the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program.
Cooper CP; Saraiya M; McLean TA; Hannan J; Liesmann JM; Rose SW; Lawson HW
J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2005 Oct; 14(8):670-8. PubMed ID: 16232098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Social inequality in Pap smear coverage: identifying under-users of cervical cancer screening in Argentina.
Arrossi S; Ramos S; Paolino M; Sankaranarayanan R
Reprod Health Matters; 2008 Nov; 16(32):50-8. PubMed ID: 19027622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A Pap test screening clinic in a South Asian community of Vancouver, British Columbia: challenges to maintaining utilization.
Grewal S; Bottorff JL; Balneaves LG
Public Health Nurs; 2004; 21(5):412-8. PubMed ID: 15363021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cervical cancer screening program of Paraná: cost-effective model in a developing country.
Bleggi Torres LF; Werner B; Totsugui J; Collaço LM; Araújo SR; Huçulak M; Boza EJ; Fischer RM; De Laat L; Sobbania LC; Raggio A
Diagn Cytopathol; 2003 Jul; 29(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 12827718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. An assessment of rural women's knowledge, constraints and perceptions on cervical cancer screening: the case of two districts in Zimbabwe.
Mangoma JF; Chirenje MZ; Chimbari MJ; Chandiwana SK
Afr J Reprod Health; 2006 Apr; 10(1):91-103. PubMed ID: 16999199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The 2003 Australian Breast Health Survey: survey design and preliminary results.
Villanueva EV; Jones S; Nehill C; Favelle S; Steel D; Iverson D; Zorbas H
BMC Public Health; 2008 Jan; 8():13. PubMed ID: 18194528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effects of a cognition-emotion focused program to increase public participation in Papanicolaou smear screening.
Park S; Chang S; Chung C
Public Health Nurs; 2005; 22(4):289-98. PubMed ID: 16150010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The cost-effectiveness of cervical screening in Australia: what is the impact of screening at different intervals or over a different age range?
Anderson R; Haas M; Shanahan M
Aust N Z J Public Health; 2008 Feb; 32(1):43-52. PubMed ID: 18290913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Pressing the key pad: trial of a novel approach to health promotion advice.
Corkrey R; Parkinson L; Bates L
Prev Med; 2005 Aug; 41(2):657-66. PubMed ID: 15917066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
