These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16145719)

  • 1. Why worry about awareness in choice problems? Econometric analysis of screening for cervical cancer.
    Belkar R; Fiebig DG; Haas M; Viney R
    Health Econ; 2006 Jan; 15(1):33-47. PubMed ID: 16145719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Knowledge, attitude and practice of cervical cancer screening among women attending gynecology clinics in a tertiary level medical care center in southeastern Nigeria.
    Mbamara SU; Ikpeze OC; Okonkwo JE; Onyiaorah IV; Ukah CO
    J Reprod Med; 2011; 56(11-12):491-6. PubMed ID: 22195332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Decisions about Pap tests: what influences women and providers?
    Fiebig DG; Haas M; Hossain I; Street DJ; Viney R
    Soc Sci Med; 2009 May; 68(10):1766-74. PubMed ID: 19339094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Attitudes and beliefs about cervical smear testing in ever-married Jordanian women.
    Amarin ZO; Badria LF; Obeidat BR
    East Mediterr Health J; 2008; 14(2):389-97. PubMed ID: 18561732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Screening for cervical cancer: will women accept less?
    Sirovich BE; Woloshin S; Schwartz LM
    Am J Med; 2005 Feb; 118(2):151-8. PubMed ID: 15694900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Increasing women's participation in Pap smear screening in Australia--how can we tell if the national policy is effective?
    Shelley J; Street A
    Aust Health Rev; 1992; 15(2):190-9. PubMed ID: 10119050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of cervical cancer screening program at a rural community of South Africa.
    Hoque M; Hoque E; Kader SB
    East Afr J Public Health; 2008 Aug; 5(2):111-6. PubMed ID: 19024420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Uptake of cervical cancer screening in The Netherlands is mainly influenced by women's beliefs about the screening and by the inviting organization.
    Tacken MA; Braspenning JC; Hermens RP; Spreeuwenberg PM; van den Hoogen HJ; de Bakker DH; Groenewegen PP; Grol RP
    Eur J Public Health; 2007 Apr; 17(2):178-85. PubMed ID: 16837520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. CAPRELA (Cancer Prevention for Latinas): findings of a pilot study in Winston-Salem, Forsyth County.
    Koval AE; Riganti AA; Foley KL
    N C Med J; 2006; 67(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 16550986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Encouraging the right women to attend for cervical cancer screening: results from a targeted television campaign in Victoria, Australia.
    Mullins R; Wakefield M; Broun K
    Health Educ Res; 2008 Jun; 23(3):477-86. PubMed ID: 17615181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Hispanic acculturation and utilization of cervical cancer screening in the US.
    Shah M; Zhu K; Wu H; Potter J
    Prev Med; 2006 Feb; 42(2):146-9. PubMed ID: 16297444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Report from the CDC. Pap test intervals used by physicians serving low-income women through the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program.
    Cooper CP; Saraiya M; McLean TA; Hannan J; Liesmann JM; Rose SW; Lawson HW
    J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2005 Oct; 14(8):670-8. PubMed ID: 16232098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Social inequality in Pap smear coverage: identifying under-users of cervical cancer screening in Argentina.
    Arrossi S; Ramos S; Paolino M; Sankaranarayanan R
    Reprod Health Matters; 2008 Nov; 16(32):50-8. PubMed ID: 19027622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A Pap test screening clinic in a South Asian community of Vancouver, British Columbia: challenges to maintaining utilization.
    Grewal S; Bottorff JL; Balneaves LG
    Public Health Nurs; 2004; 21(5):412-8. PubMed ID: 15363021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cervical cancer screening program of Paraná: cost-effective model in a developing country.
    Bleggi Torres LF; Werner B; Totsugui J; Collaço LM; Araújo SR; Huçulak M; Boza EJ; Fischer RM; De Laat L; Sobbania LC; Raggio A
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2003 Jul; 29(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 12827718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An assessment of rural women's knowledge, constraints and perceptions on cervical cancer screening: the case of two districts in Zimbabwe.
    Mangoma JF; Chirenje MZ; Chimbari MJ; Chandiwana SK
    Afr J Reprod Health; 2006 Apr; 10(1):91-103. PubMed ID: 16999199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The 2003 Australian Breast Health Survey: survey design and preliminary results.
    Villanueva EV; Jones S; Nehill C; Favelle S; Steel D; Iverson D; Zorbas H
    BMC Public Health; 2008 Jan; 8():13. PubMed ID: 18194528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of a cognition-emotion focused program to increase public participation in Papanicolaou smear screening.
    Park S; Chang S; Chung C
    Public Health Nurs; 2005; 22(4):289-98. PubMed ID: 16150010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The cost-effectiveness of cervical screening in Australia: what is the impact of screening at different intervals or over a different age range?
    Anderson R; Haas M; Shanahan M
    Aust N Z J Public Health; 2008 Feb; 32(1):43-52. PubMed ID: 18290913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Pressing the key pad: trial of a novel approach to health promotion advice.
    Corkrey R; Parkinson L; Bates L
    Prev Med; 2005 Aug; 41(2):657-66. PubMed ID: 15917066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.