297 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16145782)
1. Abortion in America.
Shostak AB
Futurist; 1991; 25(4):20-4. PubMed ID: 16145782
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Parental notification and a minor's right to an abortion after Hodgson and Akron II.
Graziano SG
Ohio North Univ Law Rev; 1991; 17(3):581-97. PubMed ID: 16145809
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The inapplicability of parental involvement laws to the distribution of mifepristone (RU-486) to minors.
Scuder AC
Am Univ J Gend Soc Policy Law; 2002; 10(3):711-41. PubMed ID: 16594112
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Family law I: abortion.
Koscs ME
Annu Surv Am Law; 1984; 2():929-60. PubMed ID: 16086473
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Journey through the courts: minors, abortion and the quest for reproductive fairness.
Ehrlich JS
Yale J Law Fem; 1998; 10(1):1-27. PubMed ID: 16596765
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Parents, judges, and a minor's abortion decisions: third party participation and the evolution of a judicial alternative.
Green W
Akron Law Rev; 1983; 17(1):87-110. PubMed ID: 16086471
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The worst of both worlds?: parental involvement requirements and the privacy rights of mature minors.
O'Shaughnessy M
Ohio State Law J; 1996; 57(5):1731-65. PubMed ID: 16086519
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. What "choice" do they have?: protecting pregnant minors' reproductive rights using state constitutions.
Weissmann R
Annu Surv Am Law; 1999; 1999(1):129-67. PubMed ID: 11958234
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Grounded in the reality of their lives: listening to teens who make the abortion decision without involving their parents.
Ehrlich JS
Berkeley Womens Law J; 2003; 18():61-180. PubMed ID: 15156878
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Splitting the baby: when can a pregnant minor obtain an abortion without parental consent? The Ex parte Anonymous cases (Alabama 2001).
Rosenberg SP
Conn Law Rev; 2002; 34(3):1109-41. PubMed ID: 15212029
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Minors as medical decision makers: the pretextual reasoning of the court in the abortion cases.
Ehrlich JS
Mich J Gend Law; 2000; 7(1):65-106. PubMed ID: 12715809
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Minor rights: the adolescent abortion cases.
Guggenheim M
Hofstra Law Rev; 2002; 30(3):589-646. PubMed ID: 15212070
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Preserving the right to choose: a minor's right to confidential reproductive health care.
Bertuglia J
Womens Rights Law Report; 2001; 23(1):63-77. PubMed ID: 12774775
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Whither the family and family privacy?
Jones TR; Peterman L
Tex Rev Law Polit; 1999; 4(1):193-236. PubMed ID: 15706723
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Case reopens abortion issue for justices.
Greenhouse L
N Y Times Web; 2005 Nov; ():A19. PubMed ID: 16450459
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The next abortion decision.
N Y Times Web; 2005 Nov; ():A34. PubMed ID: 16450474
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. State constitutional privacy rights post Webster--broader protection against abortion restrictions?
Ezzard MM
Denver Univ Law Rev; 1990; 67(3):401-19. PubMed ID: 15999439
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Law, ethics, and abortion.
Bayer R
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 1990 Aug; 2(4):564-9. PubMed ID: 2130954
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Winter count: taking stock of abortion rights after Casey and Carhart.
Borgmann CE
Fordham Urban Law J; 2004 Mar; 31(3):675-716. PubMed ID: 16700116
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Mazurek v. Armstrong: should states be allowed to restrict the performance of abortions to licensed physicians only?
Bazzelle RY
Thurgood Marshall Law Rev; 1998; 24(1):149-82. PubMed ID: 16200693
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
