These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16145784)

  • 1. An institutional review board and consent in a foreign country.
    Maloney DM
    Hum Res Rep; 1991 May; 6(5):1-2. PubMed ID: 16145784
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of the informed consent process in a randomized controlled trial in China: the Sino-U.S. NTD project.
    Wang H; Erickson JD; Li Z; Berry RJ
    J Clin Ethics; 2004; 15(1):61-75. PubMed ID: 15202360
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Research subject's complaint launches federal investigation.
    Maloney DM
    Hum Res Rep; 2003 Jan; 18(1):6-7. PubMed ID: 12755096
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluating empirical assessments of social risk.
    Schonfeld T; Brown JS
    Am J Bioeth; 2009 Nov; 9(11):55-6. PubMed ID: 19882461
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Institutional review board consideration of chart reviews, case reports, and observational studies.
    Neff MJ
    Respir Care; 2008 Oct; 53(10):1350-3. PubMed ID: 18811999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Exception from informed consent: viewpoint of institutional review boards--balancing risks to subjects, community consultation, and future directions.
    Ernst AA; Fish S
    Acad Emerg Med; 2005 Nov; 12(11):1050-5. PubMed ID: 16264073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Ethical issues in the NIMH Collaborative HIV/STD Prevention Trial.
    NIMH Collaborative HIV/STD Prevention Trial Group
    AIDS; 2007 Apr; 21 Suppl 2():S69-80. PubMed ID: 17413266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Artificial-blood study has critics seeing red.
    Guterman L
    Chron High Educ; 2006 Jun; 52(41):A17. PubMed ID: 16856302
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Numerous violations of federal informed consent requirements.
    Maloney DM
    Hum Res Rep; 2004 Jan; 19(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 14997901
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Do vitamins prevent neural tube defects (and can we find out ethically)?
    Lipsett MB; Fletcher JC
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1983 Aug; 13(4):5-8. PubMed ID: 6629750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Rules is rules.
    Orr RD
    Am J Bioeth; 2006; 6(3):40-1; discussion W49-50. PubMed ID: 16754450
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Anesthesia & Analgesia policy on institutional review board approval and informed consent for research.
    Shafer SL
    Anesth Analg; 2011 Mar; 112(3):494-5. PubMed ID: 21350223
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Continued concern: human subject protection, the institutional review board, and continuing review.
    Hoffman S
    Tenn Law Rev; 2001; 68(4):725-70. PubMed ID: 16189912
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Ethical and regulatory challenges associated with the exception from informed consent requirements for emergency research: from experimental design to institutional review board approval.
    Vaslef SN; Cairns CB; Falletta JM
    Arch Surg; 2006 Oct; 141(10):1019-23; discussion 1024. PubMed ID: 17043281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An ethical analysis of exception from informed consent regulations.
    Morris MC
    Acad Emerg Med; 2005 Nov; 12(11):1113-9. PubMed ID: 16264082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Current status of research on the federal guidelines for performing research using an exception from informed consent.
    Schmidt TA; Lewis RJ; Richardson LD
    Acad Emerg Med; 2005 Nov; 12(11):1022-6. PubMed ID: 16264068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A modest proposal.
    Burris S; Davis C
    Am J Bioeth; 2009 Nov; 9(11):W3-4. PubMed ID: 19882443
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Institutional review boards, research on children, and informed consent of parents: walking the tightrope between encouraging vital experimentation and protecting subjects' rights.
    Katerberg RJ
    J Coll Univ Law; 1998; 24(3):545-79. PubMed ID: 16331880
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. In court: the defendants must attempt to find all former research subjects.
    Maloney DM
    Hum Res Rep; 2006 May; 21(5):8. PubMed ID: 16832917
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Randomized, controlled trials as minimal risk: an ethical analysis.
    Morris MC; Nelson RM
    Crit Care Med; 2007 Mar; 35(3):940-4. PubMed ID: 17255879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.