597 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16145788)
21. Emerging notions of women's rights and responsibilities during gestation.
Blank RH
J Leg Med; 1986 Dec; 7(4):441-69. PubMed ID: 3492583
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Umbilical cords: the new drug connection.
Phillips M
Buffalo Law Rev; 1992; 40(2):525-66. PubMed ID: 11651461
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Compelling pregnancy at death's door.
Taylor KA
Columbia J Gend Law; 1997; 7(1):85-165. PubMed ID: 16184655
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. The free exercise rights of pregnant women who refuse medical treatment.
Cherry AL
Tenn Law Rev; 2002; 69(3):563-622. PubMed ID: 15378820
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. The maternal-fetal rights dilemma: honoring a woman's choice of medical care during pregnancy.
Arch RR
J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1996; 12(2):637-73. PubMed ID: 8666737
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. The body invaded: medical surveillance of women as reproducers.
Terry J
Social Rev; 1989; 89(3):13-43. PubMed ID: 11655979
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. The judge in the delivery room: the emergence of court-ordered cesareans.
Rhoden NK
Calif Law Rev; 1986 Dec; 74(6):1951-2030. PubMed ID: 11658950
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Delicate balance: the emerging issue of maternal-fetal conflict.
Allegretti J
America (NY); 1991 Mar; 164(8):238-9,249-50. PubMed ID: 16144134
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Shared interests: promoting healthy births without sacrificing women's liberty.
Johnsen D
Hastings Law J; 1992 Mar; 43(3):569-614. PubMed ID: 11652106
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Compelled medical treatment of pregnant women: the balancing of maternal and fetal rights.
Harris P
Clevel State Law Rev; 2001; 49(1):133-61. PubMed ID: 15212015
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. From conception until birth: exploring the maternal duty to protect fetal health.
Cook M
Wash Univ Law Q; 2002; 80(4):1307-40. PubMed ID: 15164743
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Court-ordered cesareans: can a pregnant woman refuse?
Leavine BA
Houst Law Rev; 1992; 29(1):185-218. PubMed ID: 11656666
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Of gametes and guardians: the impropriety of appointing guardians ad litem for fetuses and embryos.
Goldberg S
Wash Law Rev; 1991 Apr; 66(2):503-44. PubMed ID: 11656073
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Abortion rights after South Dakota.
McDonagh E
Free Inq; 2006; 26(4):34-8. PubMed ID: 16830439
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Future fear: prenatal duties imposed by private parties.
Solomon RI
Am J Law Med; 1991; 17(4):411-34. PubMed ID: 1812768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Abortion and maternal-fetal conflict: broadening our concerns.
Shultz MM
South Calif Rev Law Womens Stud; 1992; 1():79-98. PubMed ID: 16437820
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Human rights, reproductive freedom, medicine and the law.
McLean SA; Ramsey J
Med Law Int; 2002; 5(4):239-58. PubMed ID: 14983883
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Medical choices during pregnancy: whose decision is it anyway?
Goldberg S
Rutgers Law Rev; 1989; 41(2):591-623. PubMed ID: 11649263
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Addicted pregnancy as a sex crime.
Schmall L
North Ill Univ Law Rev; 1993; 13(2):263-334. PubMed ID: 11656342
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Defining the boundaries of personal privacy: is there a paternal interest in compelling therapeutic fetal surgery?
Blickenstaff DC
Northwest Univ Law Rev; 1994; 88(3):1157-99. PubMed ID: 11656414
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
