These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
296 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16145826)
1. Classical liberalism, the constitution, and abortion policy: can government be both pro-choice and anti-abortion? Bowers JR; Turgut U Univ Dayton Law Rev; 1991; 17(1):1-31. PubMed ID: 16145826 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Abortion as liberty and right. Hobin TJ Hum Life Rev; 2005; 31(1):67-78. PubMed ID: 16320459 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The validity of legislative restrictions on abortion under the Oregon constitution. Tweedt DE Temple Law Rev; 1992; 65(4):1349-71. PubMed ID: 16047444 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The impact of public abortion funding decisions on indigent women: a proposal to reform state statutory and constitutional abortion funding provisions. Corns CA Univ Mich J Law Reform; 1991; 24(2):371-403. PubMed ID: 11656224 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Abortion and the neutral state. Hunt RP First Things; 1990 Oct; 6():42-5. PubMed ID: 11659507 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Abortion issue weaves an intricate web. Greenhouse L N Y Times Web; 1986 Apr; ():A26. PubMed ID: 11647369 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Title X, the abortion debate, and the First Amendment. Shapiro AA Columbia Law Rev; 1990 Oct; 90(6):1737-78. PubMed ID: 15739274 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Politics and privacy: refining the ethical and legal issues in fetal tissue transplantation. Terry NP Wash Univ Law Q; 1988; 66(3):523-51. PubMed ID: 11659172 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. U.S. suspends plan to cut off funds for abortion ties. Pear R N Y Times Web; 1988 Mar; ():A1, B8. PubMed ID: 11646665 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. AIDS and the future of reproductive freedom. Bayer R Milbank Q; 1990; 68(Suppl. 2):179-204. PubMed ID: 11653914 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Assisted reproductive technologies and the Constitution. Coleman CH Fordham Urban Law J; 2002 Nov; 30(1):57-70. PubMed ID: 15868662 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Survey of abortion law. Platt JG; O'Malley K Ariz State Law J; 1980; 1980(1):67-216. PubMed ID: 11655392 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Reproduction, rights and public policy: a framework for assessment. Gowri A Tex Int Law J; 2000; 35(1):13-29. PubMed ID: 12656084 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Conflict of constitutions? No thanks: a response to Professors Brilmayer and Kreimer. Neuman GL Mich Law Rev; 1993 Mar; 91(5):939-52. PubMed ID: 11656300 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Constitutional analysis of the Baby M decision. Stark B Harv Womens Law J; 1988; 11():19-52. PubMed ID: 16100827 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Abortion compromise -- inevitable and impossible. Law SA Univ Ill Law Rev; 1992; 25(4):921-41. PubMed ID: 11656296 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The Title X family planning gag rule: can the government buy up constitutional rights? Chervin CI Stanford Law Rev; 1989 Jan; 41(2):401-34. PubMed ID: 11655926 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The constitutional morality of abortion. Brownstein A; Dau P Boston Coll Law Rev; 1992 Jul; 33(4):689-761. PubMed ID: 11656217 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Abortion and a nation at war. First Things; 1992 Oct; 26():9-13. PubMed ID: 11659506 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. X marks the spot while Casey strikes out: two controversial abortion decisions. Zenkich S Gold Gate Univ Law Rev; 1993; 23(3):1001-40. PubMed ID: 16437786 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]