These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Medicare program; withdrawal of coverage of certain investigational intraocular lenses.--HCFA. Final notice. Fed Regist; 1991 Apr; 56(83):19874-9. PubMed ID: 10170736 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cataract surgery and intraocular lenses: crackdown on fraud, waste, and abuse. Sax BM Health Law Vigil; 1985 Aug; 8(17):17-9. PubMed ID: 10317641 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Multifocal versus accommodating intraocular lenses: a review of the current technology, outcomes, and complications. Kubal AA Int Ophthalmol Clin; 2011; 51(2):131-41. PubMed ID: 21383586 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. A United States cost-benefit comparison of an apodized, diffractive, presbyopia-correcting, multifocal intraocular lens and a conventional monofocal lens. Maxwell WA; Waycaster CR; D'Souza AO; Meissner BL; Hileman K J Cataract Refract Surg; 2008 Nov; 34(11):1855-61. PubMed ID: 19006730 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Medicare program; adjustment in payment amounts for new technology intraocular lenses--HCFA. Proposed rule. Fed Regist; 1997 Sep; 62(171):46698-707. PubMed ID: 10173129 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Aspheric intraocular lens selection: the evolution of refractive cataract surgery. Packer M; Fine IH; Hoffman RS Curr Opin Ophthalmol; 2008 Jan; 19(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 18090888 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of Conversion to Immediate Sequential Cataract Surgery on Ambulatory Surgery Centers in the United States in the Cost-Analysis Model. Neel ST JAMA Ophthalmol; 2015 Jul; 133(7):856-7. PubMed ID: 25906175 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Hospitals big losers with new cataract rate. Koska MT Hospitals; 1988 Nov; 62(21):94. PubMed ID: 3053398 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. [Combined implantation of monofocal and multifocal intraocular lenses for presbyopia correction in cataract patients]. Mayer S; Böhm T; Häberle H; Pham DT; Wirbelauer C Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2008 Sep; 225(9):812-7. PubMed ID: 18759213 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Lifetime costs and effectiveness of ReSTOR compared with a monofocal IOL and Array-SA40 in the Netherlands. De Vries NE; Laurendeau C; Lafuma A; Berdeaux G; Nuijts RM Eye (Lond); 2010 Apr; 24(4):663-72. PubMed ID: 19575029 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Presbyopia-correcting intraocular lenses: 'one lens does not fit all'. Santaella R; Afshari N Curr Opin Ophthalmol; 2010 Jan; 21(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 19910791 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Advances in cataract surgery and intraocular lenses. Reeves SW Minn Med; 2009 Jun; 92(6):38-40. PubMed ID: 19653471 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Modelling lifetime cost consequences of ReSTOR for presbyopia in four European countries. Lafuma A; Berdeaux G Eye (Lond); 2009 May; 23(5):1072-80. PubMed ID: 18636081 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Presbyopia-correcting intraocular lenses: what retinal surgeons should know. Tewari A; Shah GK Retina; 2008 Apr; 28(4):535-7. PubMed ID: 18398353 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. IOL (intraocular lenses) prices led by technology, payments. Hosp Mater Manage; 1998 Nov; 23(11):1, 14-5. PubMed ID: 10187273 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Advanced technology IOLs in cataract surgery: management of the unhappy patient. Barsam A; Voldman A; Donnenfeld E Int Ophthalmol Clin; 2012; 52(2):95-102. PubMed ID: 22395632 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Medicare program; adjustment in payment amounts for new technology intraocular lenses furnished by ambulatory surgical centers. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), Health Care Financing Administration (HCFA). Final rule. Fed Regist; 1999 Jun; 64(115):32198-206. PubMed ID: 10558584 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]