137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16146304)
1. Cone beam volumetric tomography vs. medical CT scanners.
Winter AA; Pollack AS; Frommer HH; Koenig L
N Y State Dent J; 2005; 71(4):28-33. PubMed ID: 16146304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Clinical applications of cone-beam computed tomography in dental practice.
Scarfe WC; Farman AG; Sukovic P
J Can Dent Assoc; 2006 Feb; 72(1):75-80. PubMed ID: 16480609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Conventional spiral and low-dose computed mandibular tomography for dental implant planning.
Ekestubbe A
Swed Dent J Suppl; 1999; 138():1-82. PubMed ID: 10635103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The use of 3-dimensional imaging in dentoalveolar surgery.
Orentlicher G; Abboud M
Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2011 Jun; 32(5):78-80, 82, 85-6. PubMed ID: 21755898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cone beam CT in dental practice.
Dawood A; Patel S; Brown J
Br Dent J; 2009 Jul; 207(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 19590551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cone beam computerized tomography-based dental imaging for implant planning and surgical guidance, Part 1: Single implant in the mandibular molar region.
Almog DM; LaMar J; LaMar FR; LaMar F
J Oral Implantol; 2006; 32(2):77-81. PubMed ID: 16704109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of radiation dose for implant imaging using conventional spiral tomography, computed tomography, and cone-beam computed tomography.
Chau AC; Fung K
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Apr; 107(4):559-65. PubMed ID: 19168378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Osseous abnormalities of the mandibular condyle: diagnostic reliability of cone beam computed tomography compared with helical computed tomography based on an autopsy material.
Honda K; Larheim TA; Maruhashi K; Matsumoto K; Iwai K
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2006 May; 35(3):152-7. PubMed ID: 16618847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Conventional CT and cone beam CT for improved dental diagnostics and implant planning.
Ganz SD
Dent Implantol Update; 2005 Dec; 16(12):89-95. PubMed ID: 16422471
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessment of bone segmentation quality of cone-beam CT versus multislice spiral CT: a pilot study.
Loubele M; Maes F; Schutyser F; Marchal G; Jacobs R; Suetens P
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2006 Aug; 102(2):225-34. PubMed ID: 16876067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Geometric accuracy of the NewTom 9000 Cone Beam CT.
Marmulla R; Wörtche R; Mühling J; Hassfeld S
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2005 Jan; 34(1):28-31. PubMed ID: 15709102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. CT-based dental imaging for implant planning and surgical guidance.
Almog DM; Romano PR
N Y State Dent J; 2007 Jan; 73(1):51-3. PubMed ID: 17378318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Three-dimensional cone beam computerized tomography in dentistry.
Palomo JM; Kau CH; Palomo LB; Hans MG
Dent Today; 2006 Nov; 25(11):130, 132-5. PubMed ID: 17128717
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Implant radiography and radiology.
Monsour PA; Dudhia R
Aust Dent J; 2008 Jun; 53 Suppl 1():S11-25. PubMed ID: 18498579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Reliability of implant placement with stereolithographic surgical guides generated from computed tomography: clinical data from 94 implants.
Ersoy AE; Turkyilmaz I; Ozan O; McGlumphy EA
J Periodontol; 2008 Aug; 79(8):1339-45. PubMed ID: 18672982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Virtual diagnostics using cone bean CT.
Schmitt S
Dent Today; 2006 Jun; 25(6):90-1. PubMed ID: 16792115
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Dental implant imaging: TeraRecon's Dental 3D Cone Beam Computed Tomography System.
Garg AK
Dent Implantol Update; 2007 Jun; 18(6):41-5. PubMed ID: 17682685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The current status of 3D imaging in dental practice.
McNamara C; House K; Davies R; Barker CS; Chawla O; Sandy JR; Ireland AJ
Dent Update; 2011 Dec; 38(10):679-82, 684-6, 688-90. PubMed ID: 22408888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Clinical application of a new cone-beam computerized tomography system to assess multiple two-dimensional images for the preoperative treatment planning of maxillary implants: case reports.
Sato S; Arai Y; Shinoda K; Ito K
Quintessence Int; 2004; 35(7):525-8. PubMed ID: 15259967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The use of cone beam computed tomography as an aid in evaluating and treatment planning for mandibular cancer.
Closmann JJ; Schmidt BL
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Apr; 65(4):766-71. PubMed ID: 17368377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
