These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Anatomic pathology and patient safety: it's not an error: it's a diagnostic misadventure! Grzybicki DM; Raab SS; Janosky JE; Vrbin-Turcsanyi C; Bruno S; Zarbo RJ; Stone CH; Meier FA; Geisinger KR; Gavin AJ Am J Clin Pathol; 2008 Jan; 129(1):167-8; author reply 169. PubMed ID: 18183670 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Detection and classification of diagnostic discrepancies (errors) in surgical pathology. Roy JE; Hunt JL Adv Anat Pathol; 2010 Sep; 17(5):359-65. PubMed ID: 20733354 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Critical diagnoses (critical values) in anatomic pathology. Association of Directors of Anatomic and Surgical Pathology Am J Surg Pathol; 2006 Jul; 30(7):897-9. PubMed ID: 16819334 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Agreement and error rates using blinded review to evaluate surgical pathology of biopsy material. Renshaw AA; Cartagena N; Granter SR; Gould EW Am J Clin Pathol; 2003 Jun; 119(6):797-800. PubMed ID: 12817425 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Recent trends in quality, patient safety, and error reduction in nongyn cytology. Silverman JF Adv Anat Pathol; 2010 Nov; 17(6):437-44. PubMed ID: 20966649 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Secondary case review methods and anatomic pathology culture. Raab SS; Grzybicki DM Am J Clin Pathol; 2010 Jun; 133(6):829-31. PubMed ID: 20472838 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Correlation of workload with disagreement and amendment rates in surgical pathology and nongynecologic cytology. Renshaw AA; Gould EW Am J Clin Pathol; 2006 Jun; 125(6):820-2. PubMed ID: 16690479 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effectiveness of random and focused review in detecting surgical pathology error. Raab SS; Grzybicki DM; Mahood LK; Parwani AV; Kuan SF; Rao UN Am J Clin Pathol; 2008 Dec; 130(6):905-12. PubMed ID: 19019767 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Improving consensus on the cause of cytologic-histologic discrepancy: searching for quality assurance methods that work. Renshaw AA Am J Clin Pathol; 2006 Dec; 126(6):831-2. PubMed ID: 17074691 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Extraneous tissue: a potential source for diagnostic error in surgical pathology. Layfield LJ; Witt BL; Metzger KG; Anderson GM Am J Clin Pathol; 2011 Nov; 136(5):767-72. PubMed ID: 22031316 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A multi-institutional survey of critical diagnoses (critical values) in surgical pathology and cytology. Pereira TC; Silverman JF; LiVolsi V; Fletcher CD; Frable WJ; Goldblum JR; Swanson PE Am J Clin Pathol; 2008 Nov; 130(5):731-5. PubMed ID: 18854265 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Clinical impact and frequency of anatomic pathology errors in cancer diagnoses. Raab SS; Grzybicki DM; Janosky JE; Zarbo RJ; Meier FA; Jensen C; Geyer SJ Cancer; 2005 Nov; 104(10):2205-13. PubMed ID: 16216029 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Error-free pathology: applying lean production methods to anatomic pathology. Condel JL; Sharbaugh DT; Raab SS Clin Lab Med; 2004 Dec; 24(4):865-99. PubMed ID: 15555747 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Patient safety and error reduction in surgical pathology. Nakhleh RE Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2008 Feb; 132(2):181-5. PubMed ID: 18251572 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Measuring errors in surgical pathology in real-life practice: defining what does and does not matter. Renshaw AA; Gould EW Am J Clin Pathol; 2007 Jan; 127(1):144-52. PubMed ID: 17145620 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]