248 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16146919)
1. Biofilm formation by Enterococcus faecalis on intraocular lens material.
Kobayakawa S; Jett BD; Gilmore MS
Curr Eye Res; 2005 Sep; 30(9):741-5. PubMed ID: 16146919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Biofilm formation by Staphylococcus epidermidis on intraocular lens material.
Okajima Y; Kobayakawa S; Tsuji A; Tochikubo T
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2006 Jul; 47(7):2971-5. PubMed ID: 16799041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Biofilm formation on hydrophilic intraocular lens material.
Shimizu K; Kobayakawa S; Tsuji A; Tochikubo T
Curr Eye Res; 2006 Dec; 31(12):989-97. PubMed ID: 17169836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Adherence and kinetics of biofilm formation of Staphylococcus epidermidis to different types of intraocular lenses under dynamic flow conditions.
Baillif S; Ecochard R; Casoli E; Freney J; Burillon C; Kodjikian L
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2008 Jan; 34(1):153-8. PubMed ID: 18165096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Chemoattraction of inflammatory cells by various intraocular lens materials.
Ozdal PC; Antecka E; Baines MG; Vianna RN; Rudzinski M; Deschênes J
Ocul Immunol Inflamm; 2005 Dec; 13(6):435-8. PubMed ID: 16321887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Influence of Streptococcus mutans on Enterococcus faecalis biofilm formation.
Deng DM; Hoogenkamp MA; Exterkate RA; Jiang LM; van der Sluis LW; Ten Cate JM; Crielaard W
J Endod; 2009 Sep; 35(9):1249-52. PubMed ID: 19720224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. In vitro biofilm distribution on the intraocular lens surface of different biomaterials.
Mazoteras P; Casaroli-Marano RP
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2015 Sep; 41(9):1980-8. PubMed ID: 26603407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilm formation and structural organization on different types of intraocular lenses under in vitro flow conditions.
Baillif S; Leduff F; Hartmann DJ; Kodjikian L
Ophthalmic Res; 2013; 50(2):83-90. PubMed ID: 23797392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Interaction with intraocular lens materials: does heavy silicone oil act like silicone oil?
Yaman A; Saatci AO; Sarioğlu S; Oner FH; Durak I
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2007 Jan; 33(1):127-9. PubMed ID: 17189807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Determination of albumin sorption to intraocular lenses by radiolabeling and confocal laser scanning microscopy.
Luensmann D; Heynen M; Liu L; Sheardown H; Jones L
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2009 Nov; 35(11):2000-7. PubMed ID: 19878835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. In vivo study of bacterial adhesion to five types of intraocular lenses.
Kodjikian L; Burillon C; Chanloy C; Bostvironnois V; Pellon G; Mari E; Freney J; Roger T
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2002 Dec; 43(12):3717-21. PubMed ID: 12454042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Evaluation of the posterior capsule opacification in different types of artificial intraocular lenses].
Pozlerová J; Nekolová J; Jirásková N; Rozsíval P
Cesk Slov Oftalmol; 2009 Jan; 65(1):12-5. PubMed ID: 19366031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of AcrySof versus silicone or polymethyl methacrylate intraocular lens on posterior capsule opacification.
Li N; Chen X; Zhang J; Zhou Y; Yao X; Du L; Wei M; Liu Y
Ophthalmology; 2008 May; 115(5):830-8. PubMed ID: 17964657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Endodontic and salivary isolates of Enterococcus faecalis integrate into biofilm from human salivary bacteria cultivated in vitro.
Al-Ahmad A; Müller N; Wiedmann-Al-Ahmad M; Sava I; Hübner J; Follo M; Schirrmeister J; Hellwig E
J Endod; 2009 Jul; 35(7):986-91. PubMed ID: 19567320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cost-effectiveness analysis of PMMA, silicone, or acrylic intra-ocular lenses in cataract surgery in four European countries.
Smith AF; Lafuma A; Berdeaux G; Berto P; Brueggenjuergen B; Magaz S; Auffarth GK; Brezin A; Caporossi A; Mendicute J
Ophthalmic Epidemiol; 2005 Oct; 12(5):343-51. PubMed ID: 16272054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A novel in vitro model to study staphylococcal biofilm formation on intraocular lenses under hydrodynamic conditions.
Baillif S; Casoli E; Marion K; Roques C; Pellon G; Hartmann DJ; Freney J; Burillon C; Kodjikian L
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2006 Aug; 47(8):3410-6. PubMed ID: 16877410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Analysis of intraocular lens surface properties with atomic force microscopy.
Lombardo M; De Santo MP; Lombardo G; Barberi R; Serrao S
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2006 Aug; 32(8):1378-84. PubMed ID: 16863979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluating and defining the sharpness of intraocular lenses: microedge structure of commercially available square-edged hydrophobic lenses.
Werner L; Müller M; Tetz M
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2008 Feb; 34(2):310-7. PubMed ID: 18242459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Calcification of Hydroview H60M intraocular lenses: aqueous humor analysis and comparisons with other intraocular lens materials.
Nakanome S; Watanabe H; Tanaka K; Tochikubo T
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2008 Jan; 34(1):80-6. PubMed ID: 18165086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. An in vitro study of human lens epithelial cell adhesion to intraocular lenses with and without a fibronectin coating.
Cooke CA; McGimpsey S; Mahon G; Best RM
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2006 Jul; 47(7):2985-9. PubMed ID: 16799043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
