These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16147408)

  • 1. Remote capture of human voice acoustical data by telephone: a methods study.
    Cannizzaro MS; Reilly N; Mundt JC; Snyder PJ
    Clin Linguist Phon; 2005 Dec; 19(8):649-58. PubMed ID: 16147408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Voice acoustical measurement of the severity of major depression.
    Cannizzaro M; Harel B; Reilly N; Chappell P; Snyder PJ
    Brain Cogn; 2004 Oct; 56(1):30-5. PubMed ID: 15380873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Consistency of voice frequency and perturbation measures in children using cepstral analyses: a movement toward increased recording stability.
    Diercks GR; Ojha S; Infusino S; Maurer R; Hartnick CJ
    JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2013 Aug; 139(8):811-6. PubMed ID: 23949356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Voice Quality in Telephone Interviews: A preliminary Acoustic Investigation.
    Pommée T; Morsomme D
    J Voice; 2022 Sep; ():. PubMed ID: 36192289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of levels and types of experience on judgment of synthesized voice quality.
    Sofranko JL; Prosek RA
    J Voice; 2014 Jan; 28(1):24-35. PubMed ID: 24119637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Speech and voice after laryngectomy: perceptual and acoustical analyses of tracheoesophageal speech related to voice handicap index.
    Lundström E; Hammarberg B
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2011; 63(2):98-108. PubMed ID: 20938189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Toward improved ecological validity in the acoustic measurement of overall voice quality: combining continuous speech and sustained vowels.
    Maryn Y; Corthals P; Van Cauwenberge P; Roy N; De Bodt M
    J Voice; 2010 Sep; 24(5):540-55. PubMed ID: 19883993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The role of the different neoglottis forms in the development of esophageal voice.
    Tóth A; Csernoch L; Sziklai I; Szűcs A
    Acta Physiol Hung; 2014 Sep; 101(3):291-300. PubMed ID: 24866929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Validation of a telephone screening tool for spasmodic dysphonia and vocal fold tremor.
    Johnson DM; Hapner ER; Klein AM; Pethan M; Johns MM
    J Voice; 2014 Nov; 28(6):711-5. PubMed ID: 24962230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cepstral analysis of hypokinetic and ataxic voices: correlations with perceptual and other acoustic measures.
    Jannetts S; Lowit A
    J Voice; 2014 Nov; 28(6):673-80. PubMed ID: 24836365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Automatic intelligibility assessment of pathologic speech over the telephone.
    Haderlein T; Nöth E; Batliner A; Eysholdt U; Rosanowski F
    Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2011 Dec; 36(4):175-81. PubMed ID: 21875389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effectiveness of a voice training program for telemarketers.
    de Oliveira AG; Gouveia N; Behlau M
    J Voice; 2012 Nov; 26(6):815.e1-8. PubMed ID: 22921291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Comparison of the results of acoustic analysis of the voice recorded by different methods].
    Chernobel'skiĭ SI
    Vestn Otorinolaringol; 2014; (1):41-3. PubMed ID: 24577031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Severity of voice disorders in children: correlations between perceptual and acoustic data.
    Lopes LW; Barbosa Lima IL; Alves Almeida LN; Cavalcante DP; de Almeida AA
    J Voice; 2012 Nov; 26(6):819.e7-12. PubMed ID: 23177753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Phonetograms, aerodynamic measurements, self-evaluations, and auditory perceptual ratings of male-to-female transsexual voice.
    Holmberg EB; Oates J; Dacakis G; Grant C
    J Voice; 2010 Sep; 24(5):511-22. PubMed ID: 19766444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparison of recordings of sentences and spontaneous speech: perceptual and acoustic measures in preschool children's voices.
    McAllister A; Brandt SK
    J Voice; 2012 Sep; 26(5):673.e1-5. PubMed ID: 22717494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Acoustic analysis of four common voice diagnoses: moving toward disorder-specific assessment.
    Gillespie AI; Dastolfo C; Magid N; Gartner-Schmidt J
    J Voice; 2014 Sep; 28(5):582-8. PubMed ID: 24880672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of Rater's reliability on perceptual evaluation of different types of voice sample.
    Law T; Kim JH; Lee KY; Tang EC; Lam JH; van Hasselt AC; Tong MC
    J Voice; 2012 Sep; 26(5):666.e13-21. PubMed ID: 22243971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Perception of pitch location within a speaker's range: fundamental frequency, voice quality and speaker sex.
    Bishop J; Keating P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Aug; 132(2):1100-12. PubMed ID: 22894229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Speech and voice range profiles of adults with untrained normal voices: methodological implications.
    Sanchez K; Oates J; Dacakis G; Holmberg EB
    Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2014 Jul; 39(2):62-71. PubMed ID: 23590284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.