These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16147408)

  • 21. The Effects of Remote Signal Transmission and Recording on Acoustical Measures of Simulated Essential Vocal Tremor: Considerations for Remote Treatment Research and Telepractice.
    Lester-Smith RA; Jebaily CG; Story BH
    J Voice; 2024 Mar; 38(2):325-336. PubMed ID: 34702610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Developing a large scale population screening tool for the assessment of Parkinson's disease using telephone-quality voice.
    Arora S; Baghai-Ravary L; Tsanas A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2019 May; 145(5):2871. PubMed ID: 31153319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Acoustic comparison of vowel sounds among adult females.
    Franca MC
    J Voice; 2012 Sep; 26(5):671.e9-17. PubMed ID: 22285451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Perceptual evaluation of voice quality and its correlation with acoustic measurements.
    Bhuta T; Patrick L; Garnett JD
    J Voice; 2004 Sep; 18(3):299-304. PubMed ID: 15331102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Acoustic fidelity of internet bandwidths for measures used in speech and voice disorders.
    Xue SA; Lower A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Sep; 128(3):1366-76. PubMed ID: 20815471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Toward a more quantitative measure to assess severity of dysphonia: preliminary observations.
    Schaeffer N; Sidavi A
    J Voice; 2010 Sep; 24(5):556-63. PubMed ID: 19616403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Evaluation of two algorithms for detecting human frequency-following responses to voice pitch.
    Jeng FC; Hu J; Dickman B; Lin CY; Lin CD; Wang CY; Chung HK; Li X
    Int J Audiol; 2011 Jan; 50(1):14-26. PubMed ID: 21047294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Construction and characterization of a portable sound booth for onsite voice recording.
    Jackson CE; Tarvin JT; Richardson PA; Watts SA; Castellanos PF
    Med Probl Perform Art; 2011 Sep; 26(3):140-5. PubMed ID: 21987068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Acoustic signal typing for evaluation of voice quality in tracheoesophageal speech.
    van As-Brooks CJ; Koopmans-van Beinum FJ; Pols LC; Hilgers FJ
    J Voice; 2006 Sep; 20(3):355-68. PubMed ID: 16185840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Comparability of modern recording devices for speech analysis: smartphone, landline, laptop, and hard disc recorder.
    Vogel AP; Rosen KM; Morgan AT; Reilly S
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2014; 66(6):244-50. PubMed ID: 25676365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Assessment of irregular voices after total and laser surgical partial laryngectomy.
    Olthoff A; Mrugalla S; Laskawi R; Fröhlich M; Stuermer I; Kruse E; Ambrosch P; Steiner W
    Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2003 Sep; 129(9):994-9. PubMed ID: 12975275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Occupational voice complaints and objective acoustic measurements-do they correlate?
    Lehto L; Laaksonen L; Vilkman E; Alku P
    Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2006; 31(4):147-52. PubMed ID: 17114126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Reliability of human-supervised formant-trajectory measurement for forensic voice comparison.
    Zhang C; Morrison GS; Ochoa F; Enzinger E
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Jan; 133(1):EL54-60. PubMed ID: 23298018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A spectral/temporal method for robust fundamental frequency tracking.
    Zahorian SA; Hu H
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Jun; 123(6):4559-71. PubMed ID: 18537404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The Relationship Between Acoustic Signal Typing and Perceptual Evaluation of Tracheoesophageal Voice Quality for Sustained Vowels.
    Clapham RP; van As-Brooks CJ; van Son RJ; Hilgers FJ; van den Brekel MW
    J Voice; 2015 Jul; 29(4):517.e23-9. PubMed ID: 25795366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Pitch elevation in trangendered patients: anterior glottic web formation assisted by temporary injection augmentation.
    Anderson JA
    J Voice; 2014 Nov; 28(6):816-21. PubMed ID: 24962228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Objective assessment of pediatric voice disorders with the acoustic voice quality index.
    Reynolds V; Buckland A; Bailey J; Lipscombe J; Nathan E; Vijayasekaran S; Kelly R; Maryn Y; French N
    J Voice; 2012 Sep; 26(5):672.e1-7. PubMed ID: 22632794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Speech tasks and interrater reliability in perceptual voice evaluation.
    Lu FL; Matteson S
    J Voice; 2014 Nov; 28(6):725-32. PubMed ID: 24841668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Acoustic analysis of voice in normal and high pitch phonation: a comparative study.
    Aithal VU; Bellur R; John S; Varghese C; Guddattu V
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2012; 64(1):48-53. PubMed ID: 22076072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Voice outcome in patients treated for laryngeal cancer: efficacy of voice rehabilitation.
    Tuomi L; Björkner E; Finizia C
    J Voice; 2014 Jan; 28(1):62-8. PubMed ID: 23769005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.