243 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16147412)
1. Transfer of the horizontal patient: the effect of a friction reducing assistive device on low back mechanics.
McGill SM; Kavcic NS
Ergonomics; 2005 Jun; 48(8):915-29. PubMed ID: 16147412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Friction-reducing devices for lateral patient transfers: a biomechanical evaluation.
Lloyd JD; Baptiste A
AAOHN J; 2006 Mar; 54(3):113-9. PubMed ID: 16562622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comprehensive analysis of low-back disorder risk and spinal loading during the transferring and repositioning of patients using different techniques.
Marras WS; Davis KG; Kirking BC; Bertsche PK
Ergonomics; 1999 Jul; 42(7):904-26. PubMed ID: 10424181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Repositioning a slumped person in a wheelchair. A biomechanical analysis of three transfer techniques.
Varcin-Coad L; Barrett R
AAOHN J; 1998 Nov; 46(11):530-6. PubMed ID: 9934001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of cumulative low back loads of caregivers when transferring patients using overhead and floor mechanical lifting devices.
Santaguida PL; Pierrynowski M; Goldsmith C; Fernie G
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2005 Nov; 20(9):906-16. PubMed ID: 16054280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A biomechanical and ergonomic evaluation of patient transferring tasks: bed to wheelchair and wheelchair to bed.
Garg A; Owen B; Beller D; Banaag J
Ergonomics; 1991 Mar; 34(3):289-312. PubMed ID: 1829037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. An ergonomic comparison between mechanical and manual patient transfer techniques.
Silvia CE; Bloswick DS; Lillquist D; Wallace D; Perkins MS
Work; 2002; 19(1):19-34. PubMed ID: 12454348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Reduced push forces accompany device use during sliding transfers of seated subjects.
Grevelding P; Bohannon RW
J Rehabil Res Dev; 2001; 38(1):135-9. PubMed ID: 11322467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Friction-reducing devices for lateral patient transfers: a clinical evaluation.
Baptiste A; Boda SV; Nelson AL; Lloyd JD; Lee WE
AAOHN J; 2006 Apr; 54(4):173-80. PubMed ID: 16629007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of three single-person manual patient techniques for bed-to-wheelchair transfers.
Hess JA; Kincl LD; Mandeville DS
Home Healthc Nurse; 2007 Oct; 25(9):577-9. PubMed ID: 18049253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Measurement of action forces and posture to determine the lumbar load of healthcare workers during care activities with patient transfers.
Theilmeier A; Jordan C; Luttmann A; Jäger M
Ann Occup Hyg; 2010 Nov; 54(8):923-33. PubMed ID: 20851849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Using sitting as a component of job rotation strategies: are lifting/lowering kinetics and kinematics altered following prolonged sitting.
Howarth SJ; Beach TA; Pearson AJ; Callaghan JP
Appl Ergon; 2009 May; 40(3):433-9. PubMed ID: 19081557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. An ergonomics intervention program to prevent worker injuries in a metal autoparts factory.
Poosanthanasarn N; Lohachit C; Fungladda W; Sriboorapa S; Pulkate C
Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health; 2005 Mar; 36(2):512-22. PubMed ID: 15916064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Predictive equations to estimate spinal loads in symmetric lifting tasks.
Arjmand N; Plamondon A; Shirazi-Adl A; Larivière C; Parnianpour M
J Biomech; 2011 Jan; 44(1):84-91. PubMed ID: 20850750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effects of two hospital bed design features on physical demands and usability during brake engagement and patient transportation: a repeated measures experimental study.
Kim S; Barker LM; Jia B; Agnew MJ; Nussbaum MA
Int J Nurs Stud; 2009 Mar; 46(3):317-25. PubMed ID: 19027904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The impact of a sloped surface on low back pain during prolonged standing work: a biomechanical analysis.
Nelson-Wong E; Callaghan JP
Appl Ergon; 2010 Oct; 41(6):787-95. PubMed ID: 20116046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The effect of pallet distance on torso kinematics and low back disorder risk.
Jorgensen MJ; Handa A; Veluswamy P; Bhatt M
Ergonomics; 2005 Jun; 48(8):949-63. PubMed ID: 16147414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. How to lift a box that is too large to fit between the knees.
Kingma I; Faber GS; van Dieën JH
Ergonomics; 2010 Oct; 53(10):1228-38. PubMed ID: 20865606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Changes in spine loading patterns throughout the workday as a function of experience, lift frequency, and personality.
Chany AM; Parakkat J; Yang G; Burr DL; Marras WS
Spine J; 2006; 6(3):296-305. PubMed ID: 16651224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Workplace design guidelines for asymptomatic vs. low-back-injured workers.
Ferguson SA; Marras WS; Burr D
Appl Ergon; 2005 Jan; 36(1):85-95. PubMed ID: 15627426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
