236 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16147602)
1. Safety and efficacy of misoprostol for induction of labour in a semi-urban hospital setting.
Loto OM; Fadahunsi AA; Kolade CO
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2004 Sep; 24(6):638-40. PubMed ID: 16147602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Vaginal misoprostol induction of labour: a Nigerian hospital experience.
Ezechi OC; Kalu BK; Njokanma FO; Nwokoro CA; Okeke GC
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2004 Apr; 24(3):239-42. PubMed ID: 15203615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A prospective randomized study comparing misoprostol and oxytocin for premature rupture of membranes at term.
Zeteroğlu S; Engin-Ustün Y; Ustün Y; Güvercinçi M; Sahin G; Kamaci M
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2006 May; 19(5):283-7. PubMed ID: 16753768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Titrated low-dose vaginal and/or oral misoprostol to induce labour for prelabour membrane rupture: a randomised trial.
Bricker L; Peden H; Tomlinson AJ; Al-Hussaini TK; Idama T; Candelier C; Luckas M; Furniss H; Davies A; Kumar B; Roberts J; Alfirevic Z
BJOG; 2008 Nov; 115(12):1503-11. PubMed ID: 18752586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effectiveness and safety of vaginal misoprostol for induction of labour in unfavourable cervix in 3rd trimester.
Abbasi N; Danish N; Shakoor F; Parveen Z; Bilal SA
J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad; 2008; 20(3):33-5. PubMed ID: 19610511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Vaginal misoprostol in managing premature rupture of membranes.
Ayad IA
East Mediterr Health J; 2002; 8(4-5):515-20. PubMed ID: 15603033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparative efficacy and safety of vaginal misoprostol versus dinoprostone vaginal insert in labor induction at term: a randomized trial.
Ozkan S; Calişkan E; Doğer E; Yücesoy I; Ozeren S; Vural B
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2009 Jul; 280(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 19034471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Efficacy and safety of six hourly vaginal misoprostol versus intracervical dinoprostone: a randomized controlled trial.
Denguezli W; Trimech A; Haddad A; Hajjaji A; Saidani Z; Faleh R; Sakouhi M
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2007 Aug; 276(2):119-24. PubMed ID: 17219155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A randomized clinical trial comparing vaginal misoprostol versus cervical Foley plus oral misoprostol for cervical ripening and labor induction.
Hill JB; Thigpen BD; Bofill JA; Magann E; Moore LE; Martin JN
Am J Perinatol; 2009 Jan; 26(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 18850516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Pre-induction cervical ripening: transcervical foley catheter versus intravaginal misoprostol.
Adeniji OA; Oladokun A; Olayemi O; Adeniji OI; Odukogbe AA; Ogunbode O; Aimakhu CO; Omigbodun AO; Ilesanmi AO
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2005 Feb; 25(2):134-9. PubMed ID: 15814391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Safety and efficacy of oral versus vaginal misoprostol use for induction of labour at term.
Abbassi RM; Sirichand P; Rizvi S
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2008 Oct; 18(10):625-9. PubMed ID: 18940120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Induction of labour in nulliparous and multiparous women: a UK, multicentre, open-label study of intravaginal misoprostol in comparison with dinoprostone.
Calder AA; Loughney AD; Weir CJ; Barber JW
BJOG; 2008 Sep; 115(10):1279-88. PubMed ID: 18715414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Induction of labor with oral misoprostol in nulliparous mothers of twins.
Simões T; Condeço P; Dias E; Ventura P; Matos C; Blickstein I
J Perinat Med; 2006; 34(2):111-4. PubMed ID: 16519614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparing vaginal and sublingual administration of misoprostol for labour induction in women with intra-uterine fetal death.
Geels YP; de Gouberville MC; Visser L; van Asten HA
Trop Doct; 2010 Apr; 40(2):77-80. PubMed ID: 20305098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Induction of labor by misoprostol, an analog of PGE1. A prospective study of 200 cases].
Chraibi T; Aboulfalah A; Bisbis W; Noun M; Matar N; Samouh N; Himmi A
Sante; 1999; 9(6):345-9. PubMed ID: 10705313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparison of oral misoprostol tablets and vaginal prostaglandin E2 pessary in induction of labour at term.
Hassan AA
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2005 May; 15(5):284-7. PubMed ID: 15907239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Induction of labour with intravaginal misoprostol and prostaglandin E2 gel: a comparative study.
Nanda S; Singhal SR; Papneja A
Trop Doct; 2007 Jan; 37(1):21-4. PubMed ID: 17326881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Misoprostol use for labor induction in developing countries: a prospective study in Guinea.
Yolande H; Namory K; Delphine F; Mamadou Hady D; Mamadou Diouldé B; Daniel T; Patrick T
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2005 Sep; 122(1):40-4. PubMed ID: 16154037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Misoprostol and oxytocin in induction of labour in women with prolonged pregnancy--safety and effectiveness comparison].
Wilk M; Jureczko T; Poreba R; Sipiński A
Wiad Lek; 2001; 54(11-12):662-7. PubMed ID: 11928554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A randomised controlled trial comparing low dose vaginal misoprostol and dinoprostone vaginal gel for inducing labour at term.
Gregson S; Waterstone M; Norman I; Murrells T
BJOG; 2005 Apr; 112(4):438-44. PubMed ID: 15777441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
