These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16147822)

  • 1. Predicting late-onset growth abnormalities using growth velocity between trimesters.
    Salomon LJ; Bernard JP; Duyme M; Ville Y
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2005 Mar; 17(3):193-7. PubMed ID: 16147822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Value of a single early third trimester fetal biometry for the prediction of birth weight deviations in a low risk population.
    De Reu PA; Smits LJ; Oosterbaan HP; Nijhuis JG
    J Perinat Med; 2008; 36(4):324-9. PubMed ID: 18598122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Performance of the ultrasound examination in the early and late third trimester for the prediction of birth weight deviations.
    Souka AP; Papastefanou I; Pilalis A; Michalitsi V; Panagopoulos P; Kassanos D
    Prenat Diagn; 2013 Oct; 33(10):915-20. PubMed ID: 23703542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. First and third trimester ultrasound in the prediction of birthweight discordance in dichorionic twins.
    Banks CL; Nelson SM; Owen P
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2008 May; 138(1):34-8. PubMed ID: 17897772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Universal vs selective ultrasonography to screen for large-for-gestational-age infants and associated morbidity.
    Sovio U; Moraitis AA; Wong HS; Smith GCS
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Jun; 51(6):783-791. PubMed ID: 28425156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Doppler assessment of the uterine circulation in the second trimester in twin pregnancies: prediction of pre-eclampsia, fetal growth restriction and birth weight discordance.
    Geipel A; Berg C; Germer U; Katalinic A; Krapp M; Smrcek J; Gembruch U
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Dec; 20(6):541-5. PubMed ID: 12493041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison of single versus multiple growth ultrasonographic examinations in predicting birth weight.
    Hedriana HL; Moore TR
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Jun; 170(6):1600-4; discussion 1604-6. PubMed ID: 8203416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Three-Versus Two-Dimensional Sonographic Biometry for Predicting Birth Weight and Macrosomia in Diabetic Pregnancies.
    Tuuli MG; Kapalka K; Macones GA; Cahill AG
    J Ultrasound Med; 2016 Sep; 35(9):1925-30. PubMed ID: 27466257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prediction of intrauterine growth restriction with customised estimated fetal weight centiles.
    Owen P; Ogah J; Bachmann LM; Khan KS
    BJOG; 2003 Apr; 110(4):411-5. PubMed ID: 12699804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Use of umbilical-cerebral Doppler ratios in predicting fetal growth restriction in near-term fetuses.
    To WW; Chan AM; Mok KM
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2005 Apr; 45(2):130-6. PubMed ID: 15760314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Estimation of small and large fetal weight at delivery from ultrasound data].
    Lalys L; Grangé G; Pineau JC
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2012 Oct; 41(6):566-73. PubMed ID: 22748475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Use of ultrasound longitudinal data in the diagnosis of abnormal fetal growth.
    Nasrat HA
    J Matern Fetal Med; 1997; 6(4):209-14. PubMed ID: 9260117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Accuracy of single ultrasound parameters in detection of fetal growth restriction.
    Niknafs P; Sibbald J
    Am J Perinatol; 2001 Sep; 18(6):325-34. PubMed ID: 11607850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Intrapartum fetal abdominal circumference by ultrasonography for predicting fetal macrosomia.
    Loetworawanit R; Chittacharoen A; Sututvoravut S
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2006 Oct; 89 Suppl 4():S60-4. PubMed ID: 17726811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Abnormal growth patterns in diabetes in pregnancy: a longitudinal study.
    Langer O; Kozlowski S; Brustman L
    Isr J Med Sci; 1991; 27(8-9):516-23. PubMed ID: 1960050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The risks of spontaneous preterm delivery and perinatal mortality in relation to size at birth according to fetal versus neonatal growth standards.
    Lackman F; Capewell V; Richardson B; daSilva O; Gagnon R
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Apr; 184(5):946-53. PubMed ID: 11303203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Fetal upper arm volume in predicting intrauterine growth restriction: a three-dimensional ultrasound study.
    Chang CH; Yu CH; Ko HC; Chen CL; Chang FM
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2005 Nov; 31(11):1435-9. PubMed ID: 16286022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Using unconditional and conditional standard deviation scores of fetal abdominal area measurements in the prediction of intrauterine growth restriction.
    Owen P; Burton K; Ogston S; Khan KS; Howie PW
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Oct; 16(5):439-44. PubMed ID: 11169328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Predicting large fetuses at birth: do multiple ultrasound examinations and longitudinal statistical modelling improve prediction?
    Zhang J; Kim S; Grewal J; Albert PS
    Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol; 2012 May; 26(3):199-207. PubMed ID: 22471679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Screening efficacy of the subcutaneous tissue width/femur length ratio for fetal macrosomia in the non-diabetic pregnancy.
    Rotmensch S; Celentano C; Liberati M; Malinger G; Sadan O; Bellati U; Glezerman M
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1999 May; 13(5):340-4. PubMed ID: 10380299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.