BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16149243)

  • 1. Reference zero for the calibration of audiometric equipment using 'clicks' as test signals.
    Richter U; Fedtke T
    Int J Audiol; 2005 Aug; 44(8):478-87. PubMed ID: 16149243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reference zero for the calibration of air-conduction audiometric equipment using 'tone bursts' as test signals.
    Fedtke T; Richter U
    Int J Audiol; 2007 Jan; 46(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 17365049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Earphones in extended high-frequency audiometry and ISO 389-5.
    Rodríguez Valiente A; García Berrocal JR; Roldán Fidalgo A; Trinidad A; Ramírez Camacho R
    Int J Audiol; 2014 Sep; 53(9):595-603. PubMed ID: 24793886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reference hearing threshold levels for short duration signals.
    Poulsen T; Legarth SV
    Int J Audiol; 2008 Oct; 47(10):665-74. PubMed ID: 18923987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Pure-Tone Audiometry With Forward Pressure Level Calibration Leads to Clinically-Relevant Improvements in Test-Retest Reliability.
    Lapsley Miller JA; Reed CM; Robinson SR; Perez ZD
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(5):946-957. PubMed ID: 29470259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Variation of young normal-hearing thresholds measured using different audiometric earphones: implications for the acoustic coupler and the ear simulator.
    Lawton BW
    Int J Audiol; 2005 Aug; 44(8):444-51. PubMed ID: 16149239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Using a combination of click- and tone burst-evoked auditory brain stem response measurements to estimate pure-tone thresholds.
    Gorga MP; Johnson TA; Kaminski JR; Beauchaine KL; Garner CA; Neely ST
    Ear Hear; 2006 Feb; 27(1):60-74. PubMed ID: 16446565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Recent changes in audiometric standards.
    Shipton MS
    Br J Audiol; 1989 Aug; 23(3):261-3. PubMed ID: 2790313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Influence of transducer types on bone conduction hearing thresholds.
    Fröhlich L; Plontke SK; Rahne T
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(4):e0195233. PubMed ID: 29641550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Acoustic method for calibration of audiometric bone vibrators.
    Margolis RH; Stiepan SM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Feb; 131(2):1221-5. PubMed ID: 22352496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Relationship between transducer type and low-frequency hearing loss for patients with ventilation tubes.
    Tokar-Prejna S; Meinzen-Derr J
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2006 Jun; 70(6):1063-7. PubMed ID: 16364457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Free-field sensitivity level of audiometric earphones to be used for speech audiometer calibration.
    Brinkmann K; Richter U
    Scand Audiol; 1989; 18(2):75-81. PubMed ID: 2756336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reference equivalent threshold sound pressure levels for the Wireless Automated Hearing Test System.
    Clavier OH; Norris JA; Hinckley DW; Martin WH; Lee SY; Soli SD; Brungart DS; Schurman JR; Larsen E; Mehraei G; Quigley TM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2022 Jul; 152(1):601. PubMed ID: 35931498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Bone conduction errors at high frequencies: implications for clinical and medico-legal practice.
    Lightfoot GR; Hughes JB
    J Laryngol Otol; 1993 Apr; 107(4):305-8. PubMed ID: 8320514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Affordable headphones for accessible screening audiometry: An evaluation of the Sennheiser HD202 II supra-aural headphone.
    Van der Aerschot M; Swanepoel de W; Mahomed-Asmail F; Myburgh HC; Eikelboom RH
    Int J Audiol; 2016 Nov; 55(11):616-22. PubMed ID: 27610920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reference hearing threshold levels for chirp signals delivered by an ER-3A insert earphone.
    Gøtsche-Rasmussen K; Poulsen T; Elberling C
    Int J Audiol; 2012 Nov; 51(11):794-9. PubMed ID: 22909083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Electro-acoustic performance of the new bone vibrator Radioear B81: a comparison with the conventional Radioear B71.
    Jansson KJ; Håkansson B; Johannsen L; Tengstrand T
    Int J Audiol; 2015 May; 54(5):334-40. PubMed ID: 25519145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Equivalent hearing threshold levels for the RadioEar IP30 insert earphone and short-term stimuli: comparison of peak-equivalent and RMS-based measures.
    Fedtke T; Bug MU
    Int J Audiol; 2020 May; 59(5):398-402. PubMed ID: 31657255
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Nord-Trøndelag Norway Audiometric Survey 1996-98: unscreened thresholds and prevalence of hearing impairment for adults > 20 years.
    Borchgrevink HM; Tambs K; Hoffman HJ
    Noise Health; 2005; 7(28):1-15. PubMed ID: 16417702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Acoustic method for calibration of audiometric bone vibrators. II. Harmonic distortion.
    Ginter SM; Margolis RH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Jul; 134(1):EL33-7. PubMed ID: 23862903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.