112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16149656)
1. Public attitudes toward electronic health records.
Westin AF
AHIP Cover; 2005; 46(4):22-5. PubMed ID: 16149656
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Not so confidential. Patients have reasons to be so worried about who is seeing their medical records.
Sloane T
Mod Healthc; 2005 Nov; 35(46):22. PubMed ID: 16334818
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Privacy fear factor arises. The public sees benefits to be had from healthcare IT but concerns about misuse of data emerge in survey.
Robeznieks A
Mod Healthc; 2005 Nov; 35(46):6-7, 16, 1. PubMed ID: 16334811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Technical difficulties. Recent health IT security breaches are unlikely to improve the public's perception about the safety of personal data.
Becker C
Mod Healthc; 2006 Feb; 36(8):6-7, 16, 1. PubMed ID: 16515213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A tale of two surveys. Polls find divergent consumer opinions on EHRs.
Robeznieks A
Mod Healthc; 2006 Dec; 36(49):8-10. PubMed ID: 17213998
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Move to market gene pool angers Iceland's MDs.
Sullivan P
CMAJ; 1999 Aug; 161(3):305. PubMed ID: 10463054
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Electronic medical records: if not now, when?
Carroll J
Manag Care; 2000 Jul; 9(7):24-5, 29-30, 33-4. PubMed ID: 18540339
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Understanding West Virginia's Records Confidentiality Act on the implementation of electronic health records.
Curtis C
W V Med J; 2007; 103(2):54. PubMed ID: 17557539
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Patient records. Who do they trust?
Hosp Health Netw; 1997 Oct; 71(19):30. PubMed ID: 9344021
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Private matters. Will electronic medical records doom confidentiality?
Jones TL; George T
Tex Med; 1996 May; 92(5):46-50. PubMed ID: 8775848
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. When technology and health care collide: issues with electronic medical records and electronic mail.
Jurevic AM
UMKC Law Rev; 1998; 66(4):809-36. PubMed ID: 16273691
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Electronic personal health records: should doctors worry?
Wynia MK
Medscape J Med; 2008; 10(8):204. PubMed ID: 18924656
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. On IT, privacy is the priority. Ideas for a data security plan that can win essential public trust.
Findlay S; Rein A
Mod Healthc; 2007 Jan; 37(3):22. PubMed ID: 18441672
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Readers' and author's responses to "Electronic personal health records: should doctors worry?".
Huser V
Medscape J Med; 2008; 10(10):250; author reply 250. PubMed ID: 19117083
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Americans trust physicians, not government, with medical info.
Manag Care Strateg; 1997 Oct; 5(10):119-20. PubMed ID: 10173335
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Electronic health records and privacy.
Fetter MS
Issues Ment Health Nurs; 2009 Jun; 30(6):408-9. PubMed ID: 19499443
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Privacy and security for electronic health records.
Sharpe VA
Hastings Cent Rep; 2005; 35(6):49. PubMed ID: 16396204
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Retail health clinics are rolling your way.
Sullivan D
Fam Pract Manag; 2006 May; 13(5):65-72. PubMed ID: 16736907
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Portable electronic medical records are closer to reality, but not without hitches.
Hede K
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2007 Feb; 99(4):268-9. PubMed ID: 17312301
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The data page. Consumer confusion: are EMRs worth the risk?
Runy LA
Hosp Health Netw; 2005 Apr; 79(4):34. PubMed ID: 15916342
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
