These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16151238)

  • 1. Development of bacteria and benthic total maximum daily loads: a case study, Linville Creek, Virginia.
    Benham BL; Brannan KM; Yagow G; Zeckoski RW; Dillaha TA; Mostaghimi S; Wynn JW
    J Environ Qual; 2005; 34(5):1860-72. PubMed ID: 16151238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Development of total maximum daily loads for bacteria impaired watershed using the comprehensive hydrology and water quality simulation model.
    Kim SM; Brannan KM; Zeckoski RW; Benham BL
    J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng; 2014; 49(9):1077-89. PubMed ID: 24798906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Estimation of runoff and sediment yield in the Redrock Creek watershed using AnnAGNPS and GIS.
    Tsou MS; Zhan XY
    J Environ Sci (China); 2004; 16(5):865-7. PubMed ID: 15559830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessment of a turfgrass sod best management practice on water quality in a suburban watershed.
    Richards CE; Munster CL; Vietor DM; Arnold JG; White R
    J Environ Manage; 2008 Jan; 86(1):229-45. PubMed ID: 17298864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Combined Bayesian statistics and load duration curve method for bacteria nonpoint source loading estimation.
    Shen J; Zhao Y
    Water Res; 2010 Jan; 44(1):77-84. PubMed ID: 19781737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Estimation of pollutant loads considering dam operation in Han River Basin by BASINS/Hydrological Simulation Program-FORTRAN.
    Jung KW; Yoon CG; Jang JH; Kong DS
    Water Sci Technol; 2008; 58(12):2329-38. PubMed ID: 19092211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Economic total maximum daily load for watershed-based pollutant trading.
    Zaidi AZ; deMonsabert SM
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2015 Apr; 22(8):6308-24. PubMed ID: 25487554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Risk-based decision making to evaluate pollutant reduction scenarios.
    Ahmadisharaf E; Benham BL
    Sci Total Environ; 2020 Feb; 702():135022. PubMed ID: 31731127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Linking trading ratio with TMDL (total maximum daily load) allocation matrix and uncertainty analysis.
    Zhang HX
    Water Sci Technol; 2008; 58(1):103-8. PubMed ID: 18653943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Fecal coliform modeling under two flow scenarios in St. Louis Bay of Mississippi.
    Liu Z; Hashim NB; Kingery WL; Huddleston DH
    J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng; 2010; 45(3):282-91. PubMed ID: 20390869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Diffuse phosphorus models in the United States and europe: their usages, scales, and uncertainties.
    Radcliffe DE; Freer J; Schoumans O
    J Environ Qual; 2009; 38(5):1956-67. PubMed ID: 19704139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Development of the fecal coliform total maximum daily load using Loading Simulation Program C++ and tidal prism model in estuarine shellfish growing areas: a case study in the Nassawadox coastal embayment, Virginia.
    Shen J; Sun S; Wang T
    J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng; 2005; 40(9):1791-807. PubMed ID: 16134369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) in San Francisco Bay.
    Davis JA; Hetzel F; Oram JJ; McKee LJ
    Environ Res; 2007 Sep; 105(1):67-86. PubMed ID: 17451673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A Bayesian approach for calculating variable total maximum daily loads and uncertainty assessment.
    Chen D; Dahlgren RA; Shen Y; Lu J
    Sci Total Environ; 2012 Jul; 430():59-67. PubMed ID: 22634550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A storm event-based approach to TMDL development.
    Hsu TH; Lin JY; Lee TC; Zhang HX; Yu SL
    Environ Monit Assess; 2010 Apr; 163(1-4):81-94. PubMed ID: 19266300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Stream sediment and nutrient loads in the Tahoe Basin--estimated vs monitored loads for TMDL "crediting".
    Grismer ME
    Environ Monit Assess; 2013 Sep; 185(9):7883-94. PubMed ID: 23435852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Source specific fecal bacteria modeling using soil and water assessment tool model.
    Parajuli PB; Mankin KR; Barnes PL
    Bioresour Technol; 2009 Jan; 100(2):953-63. PubMed ID: 18703332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparative evaluation of runoff and water quality using HSPF and SWMM.
    Lee SB; Yoon CG; Jung KW; Hwang HS
    Water Sci Technol; 2010; 62(6):1401-9. PubMed ID: 20861556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Modeling sediment and nitrogen export from a rural watershed in eastern Canada using the soil and water assessment tool.
    Nafees Ahmad HM; Sinclair A; Jamieson R; Madani A; Hebb D; Havard P; Yiridoe EK
    J Environ Qual; 2011; 40(4):1182-94. PubMed ID: 21712588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of HSPF and SWAT models performance for runoff and sediment yield prediction.
    Im S; Brannan KM; Mostaghimi S; Kim SM
    J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng; 2007 Sep; 42(11):1561-70. PubMed ID: 17849297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.