238 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16151342)
1. Measurement and analysis of access resistance and polarization impedance in cochlear implant recipients.
Tykocinski M; Cohen LT; Cowan RS
Otol Neurotol; 2005 Sep; 26(5):948-56. PubMed ID: 16151342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Access and Polarization Electrode Impedance Changes in Electric-Acoustic Stimulation Cochlear Implant Users with Delayed Loss of Acoustic Hearing.
Tejani VD; Yang H; Kim JS; Hernandez H; Oleson JJ; Hansen MR; Gantz BJ; Abbas PJ; Brown CJ
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2022 Feb; 23(1):95-118. PubMed ID: 34686938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Impedance changes in cochlear implant users].
Zadrozniak M; Szymański M; Siwiec H; Broda T
Otolaryngol Pol; 2011; 65(3):214-7. PubMed ID: 21916223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Analysis of electrode impedance and its subcomponents for lateral wall, mid-scala, and perimodiolar electrodes in cochlear implants.
Saoji AA; Graham M; Stein A; Koka K
Cochlear Implants Int; 2022 Mar; 23(2):87-94. PubMed ID: 34895078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Impedance changes in chronically implanted and stimulated cochlear implant electrodes.
Newbold C; Mergen S; Richardson R; Seligman P; Millard R; Cowan R; Shepherd R
Cochlear Implants Int; 2014 Jul; 15(4):191-9. PubMed ID: 23998484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of electrode impedance measures between a dexamethasone-eluting and standard Cochlear™ Contour Advance® electrode in adult cochlear implant recipients.
Briggs R; O 'Leary S; Birman C; Plant K; English R; Dawson P; Risi F; Gavrilis J; Needham K; Cowan R
Hear Res; 2020 May; 390():107924. PubMed ID: 32143111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Novel Impedance Measures as Biomarker for Intracochlear Fibrosis.
Leblans M; Sismono F; Vanpoucke F; van Dinther J; Lerut B; Kuhweide R; Offeciers E; Zarowski A
Hear Res; 2022 Dec; 426():108563. PubMed ID: 35794046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Impedance Changes and Fibrous Tissue Growth after Cochlear Implantation Are Correlated and Can Be Reduced Using a Dexamethasone Eluting Electrode.
Wilk M; Hessler R; Mugridge K; Jolly C; Fehr M; Lenarz T; Scheper V
PLoS One; 2016; 11(2):e0147552. PubMed ID: 26840740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A longitudinal study of electrode impedance, the electrically evoked compound action potential, and behavioral measures in nucleus 24 cochlear implant users.
Hughes ML; Vander Werff KR; Brown CJ; Abbas PJ; Kelsay DM; Teagle HF; Lowder MW
Ear Hear; 2001 Dec; 22(6):471-86. PubMed ID: 11770670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Observation on the change of electrode impedance and THR/MCL values in 20 cases with Med-EL Combi 40+ cochlear implant].
Wu W; Jia H; Li Y; Tang Z; Huang Q; Yang J; Mei L; Haung Z; Wu H
Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Nov; 27(22):1238-42. PubMed ID: 24616980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of age, electrode array, and time on cochlear implant impedances.
Velandia S; Martinez D; Goncalves S; Pena S; Bas E; Ein L; Prentiss S; Telischi F; Angeli S; Dinh CT
Cochlear Implants Int; 2020 Nov; 21(6):344-352. PubMed ID: 32640889
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Detection of Translocation of Cochlear Implant Electrode Arrays by Intracochlear Impedance Measurements.
Dong Y; Briaire JJ; Siebrecht M; Stronks HC; Frijns JHM
Ear Hear; 2021; 42(5):1397-1404. PubMed ID: 33974777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Differences in the impedance of cochlear implant devices within 24 hours of their implantation.
Lin DP; Chen JK; Tung TH; Li LP
PLoS One; 2019; 14(9):e0222711. PubMed ID: 31536550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Chronic electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve using high surface area (HiQ) platinum electrodes.
Tykocinski M; Duan Y; Tabor B; Cowan RS
Hear Res; 2001 Sep; 159(1-2):53-68. PubMed ID: 11520634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Four-Point Impedance Changes After Cochlear Implantation for Lateral Wall and Perimodiolar Implants.
Razmovski T; Bester C; Collins A; Tan E; O'Leary SJ
Otol Neurotol; 2022 Dec; 43(10):e1107-e1114. PubMed ID: 36351225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Delayed changes in auditory status in cochlear implant users with preserved acoustic hearing.
Scheperle RA; Tejani VD; Omtvedt JK; Brown CJ; Abbas PJ; Hansen MR; Gantz BJ; Oleson JJ; Ozanne MV
Hear Res; 2017 Jul; 350():45-57. PubMed ID: 28432874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Detection of modiolar proximity through bipolar impedance measurements.
Pile J; Sweeney AD; Kumar S; Simaan N; Wanna GB
Laryngoscope; 2017 Jun; 127(6):1413-1419. PubMed ID: 27557458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Electrical Impedance as a Biomarker for Inner Ear Pathology Following Lateral Wall and Peri-modiolar Cochlear Implantation.
Shaul C; Bester CW; Weder S; Choi J; Eastwood H; Padmavathi KV; Collins A; O'Leary SJ
Otol Neurotol; 2019 Jun; 40(5):e518-e526. PubMed ID: 31083087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Intra- and postoperative electrode impedance of the straight and Contour arrays of the Nucleus 24 cochlear implant: relation to T and C levels.
van Wermeskerken GK; van Olphen AF; Smoorenburg GF
Int J Audiol; 2006 Sep; 45(9):537-44. PubMed ID: 17005497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinical case study review: steroid-responsive change in electrode impedance.
Wolfe J; Baker RS; Wood M
Otol Neurotol; 2013 Feb; 34(2):227-32. PubMed ID: 23295725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
