These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16151682)

  • 1. Video analysis of endoscopic cutting task performed by one versus two operators.
    Zheng B; Verjee F; Lomax A; MacKenzie CL
    Surg Endosc; 2005 Oct; 19(10):1388-95. PubMed ID: 16151682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A laboratory study on anticipatory movement in laparoscopic surgery: a behavioral indicator for team collaboration.
    Zheng B; Swanström LL; MacKenzie CL
    Surg Endosc; 2007 Jun; 21(6):935-40. PubMed ID: 17180265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Collaborative performance in laparoscopic teams: behavioral evidences from simulation.
    He W; Zheng B
    Surg Endosc; 2016 Oct; 30(10):4569-74. PubMed ID: 26895913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of face-mounted binocular video display for laparoscopy: outcomes of psychometric skills testing and surgeon satisfaction.
    Minnich DJ; Schell SR
    J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2003 Oct; 13(5):333-8. PubMed ID: 14617395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Individualized image display improves performance in laparoscopic surgery.
    Thakkar RK; Steigman SA; Aidlen JT; Luks FI
    J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2012 Dec; 22(10):1010-3. PubMed ID: 22731802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reaction times and the decision-making process in endoscopic surgery.
    Zheng B; Janmohamed Z; MacKenzie CL
    Surg Endosc; 2003 Sep; 17(9):1475-80. PubMed ID: 12811661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Image converter eliminates mirror imaging during laparoscopy.
    Johnston WK; Low RK; Das S
    J Endourol; 2003 Jun; 17(5):327-31. PubMed ID: 12885360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Improving performance under mirror-image conditions during laparoscopic surgery using the Broadview camera system.
    Tokunaga M; Egi H; Hattori M; Suzuki T; Kawahara T; Ohdan H
    Asian J Endosc Surg; 2014 Jan; 7(1):17-24. PubMed ID: 24330448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Optimizing laparoscopic task efficiency: the role of camera and monitor positions.
    Haveran LA; Novitsky YW; Czerniach DR; Kaban GK; Taylor M; Gallagher-Dorval K; Schmidt R; Kelly JJ; Litwin DE
    Surg Endosc; 2007 Jun; 21(6):980-4. PubMed ID: 17436042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparison of early learning curves for complex bimanual coordination with open, laparoscopic, and flexible endoscopic instrumentation.
    Spaun GO; Zheng B; Martinec DV; Arnold BN; Swanström LL
    Surg Endosc; 2010 Sep; 24(9):2145-55. PubMed ID: 20174939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Is a robotic system really better than the three-dimensional laparoscopic system in terms of suturing performance?: comparison among operators with different levels of experience.
    Park YS; Oo AM; Son SY; Shin DJ; Jung DH; Ahn SH; Park DJ; Kim HH
    Surg Endosc; 2016 Apr; 30(4):1485-90. PubMed ID: 26139502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Ergonomic principles of task alignment, visual display, and direction of execution of laparoscopic bowel suturing.
    Emam TA; Hanna G; Cuschieri A
    Surg Endosc; 2002 Feb; 16(2):267-71. PubMed ID: 11967676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of automatic image realignment on visuomotor coordination in simulated laparoscopic surgery.
    Zhang L; Cao CG
    Appl Ergon; 2012 Nov; 43(6):993-1001. PubMed ID: 22373561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparison of laparoscopic and robotic assisted suturing performance by experts and novices.
    Chandra V; Nehra D; Parent R; Woo R; Reyes R; Hernandez-Boussard T; Dutta S
    Surgery; 2010 Jun; 147(6):830-9. PubMed ID: 20045162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Bimanual coordination in natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery: comparing the conventional dual-channel endoscope, the R-Scope, and a novel direct-drive system.
    Spaun GO; Zheng B; Martinec DV; Cassera MA; Dunst CM; Swanström LL
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2009 May; 69(6):e39-45. PubMed ID: 19410036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reverse-alignment surgical skills assessment.
    Gould JC; Frydman J
    Surg Endosc; 2007 Apr; 21(4):669-71. PubMed ID: 17285380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of passive polarizing three-dimensional displays on surgical performance for experienced laparoscopic surgeons.
    Smith R; Schwab K; Day A; Rockall T; Ballard K; Bailey M; Jourdan I
    Br J Surg; 2014 Oct; 101(11):1453-9. PubMed ID: 25131843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Eliminating the effects of paradoxic imaging during laparoscopic surgery.
    Abodeely AA; Cheah YL; Ryder BA; Aidlen JT; Luks FI
    J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2010 Feb; 20(1):31-4. PubMed ID: 20059327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. LapMentor metrics possess limited construct validity.
    Andreatta PB; Woodrum DT; Gauger PG; Minter RM
    Simul Healthc; 2008; 3(1):16-25. PubMed ID: 19088638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Learning to use minimal access surgical instruments and 2-dimensional remote visual feedback: how difficult is the task for novices?
    Perkins N; Starkes JL; Lee TD; Hutchison C
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2002; 7(2):117-31. PubMed ID: 12075144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.