These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16151720)

  • 1. Response execution, selection, or activation: what is sufficient for response-related repetition effects under task shifting?
    Hübner R; Druey MD
    Psychol Res; 2006 Jul; 70(4):245-61. PubMed ID: 16151720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Multiple response codes play specific roles in response selection and inhibition under task switching.
    Hübner R; Druey MD
    Psychol Res; 2008 Jul; 72(4):415-24. PubMed ID: 17534655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The impact of stimulus-specific practice and task instructions on response congruency effects between tasks.
    Wendt M; Kiesel A
    Psychol Res; 2008 Jul; 72(4):425-32. PubMed ID: 17546462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Preparatory processes in the task-switching paradigm: evidence from the use of probability cues.
    Dreisbach G; Haider H; Kluwe RH
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2002 May; 28(3):468-83. PubMed ID: 12018499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of stimulus features and instruction on response coding, selection, and inhibition: evidence from repetition effects under task switching.
    Druey MD; Hübner R
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2008 Oct; 61(10):1573-600. PubMed ID: 18777444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Stimulus-category and response-repetition effects in task switching: an evaluation of four explanations.
    Druey MD
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 Jan; 40(1):125-46. PubMed ID: 23895451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Location and shape in inhibition of return.
    Riggio L; Patteri I; Umiltà C
    Psychol Res; 2004 Feb; 68(1):41-54. PubMed ID: 12827352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Response-repetition effects in task switching - dissociating effects of anatomical and spatial response discriminability.
    Koch I; Schuch S; Vu KP; Proctor RW
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2011 Mar; 136(3):399-404. PubMed ID: 21296307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Response-based strengthening in task shifting: evidence from shift effects produced by errors.
    Steinhauser M; Hübner R
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Jun; 32(3):517-34. PubMed ID: 16822122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Task switching and action sequencing.
    Schuch S; Koch I
    Psychol Res; 2006 Nov; 70(6):526-40. PubMed ID: 16328435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Response selection and response execution in task switching: evidence from a go-signal paradigm.
    Philipp AM; Jolicoeur P; Falkenstein M; Koch I
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Nov; 33(6):1062-75. PubMed ID: 17983313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Response-repetition effects in task switching with and without response execution.
    Schuch S; Koch I
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 Nov; 135(3):302-9. PubMed ID: 20719288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assembling a task space: global determination of local shift costs.
    Kleinsorge T; Heuer H; Schmidtke V
    Psychol Res; 2004 Feb; 68(1):31-40. PubMed ID: 12774231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Role of practice and stimulus-onset-asynchrony in modulating effects of stimulus repetition, category relation, and response compatibility in the Eriksen flanker task.
    Zhang H
    Percept Mot Skills; 1997 Jun; 84(3 Pt 1):1087-96. PubMed ID: 9172226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Mixing costs in task shifting reflect sequential processing stages in a multicomponent task.
    Steinhauser M; Hübner R
    Mem Cognit; 2005 Dec; 33(8):1484-94. PubMed ID: 16615395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Hierarchical control of cognitive processes: switching tasks in sequences.
    Schneider DW; Logan GD
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2006 Nov; 135(4):623-40. PubMed ID: 17087577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Response inhibition under task switching: its strength depends on the amount of task-irrelevant response activation.
    Druey MD; Hübner R
    Psychol Res; 2008 Sep; 72(5):515-27. PubMed ID: 17901980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Response repetition benefits and costs.
    Kleinsorge T
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 1999 Dec; 103(3):295-310. PubMed ID: 10668302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Electrophysiological correlates of residual switch costs.
    Gajewski PD; Kleinsorge T; Falkenstein M
    Cortex; 2010 Oct; 46(9):1138-48. PubMed ID: 19717147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Implicit task sets in task switching?
    Dreisbach G; Goschke T; Haider H
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Nov; 32(6):1221-33. PubMed ID: 17087579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.