244 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16152740)
1. Imaging for predicting the risk factors--the circumferential resection margin and nodal disease--of local recurrence in rectal cancer: a meta-analysis.
Lahaye MJ; Engelen SM; Nelemans PJ; Beets GL; van de Velde CJ; van Engelshoven JM; Beets-Tan RG
Semin Ultrasound CT MR; 2005 Aug; 26(4):259-68. PubMed ID: 16152740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Diagnostic accuracy of MRI for assessment of T category, lymph node metastases, and circumferential resection margin involvement in patients with rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Al-Sukhni E; Milot L; Fruitman M; Beyene J; Victor JC; Schmocker S; Brown G; McLeod R; Kennedy E
Ann Surg Oncol; 2012 Jul; 19(7):2212-23. PubMed ID: 22271205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluating local lymph node metastasis with magnetic resonance imaging, endoluminal ultrasound and computed tomography in rectal cancer: a meta-analysis.
Li XT; Sun YS; Tang L; Cao K; Zhang XY
Colorectal Dis; 2015 Jun; 17(6):O129-35. PubMed ID: 25628186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging assessment of circumferential resection margin predicts disease-free survival and local recurrence: 5-year follow-up results of the MERCURY study.
Taylor FG; Quirke P; Heald RJ; Moran BJ; Blomqvist L; Swift IR; Sebag-Montefiore D; Tekkis P; Brown G;
J Clin Oncol; 2014 Jan; 32(1):34-43. PubMed ID: 24276776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Diagnostic Accuracy of MRI for Assessment of T Category and Circumferential Resection Margin Involvement in Patients With Rectal Cancer: A Meta-Analysis.
Zhang G; Cai YZ; Xu GH
Dis Colon Rectum; 2016 Aug; 59(8):789-99. PubMed ID: 27384098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Clinical significance of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging in staging of rectal cancer].
Kim JH
Korean J Gastroenterol; 2006 Apr; 47(4):248-53. PubMed ID: 16632974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Accuracy of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging in prediction of pathological stage and circumferential resection margin in rectal cancer].
Jiang JB; Dai Y; Zhang XM; Li CF; Jin ZT; Bi DS; Sun JZ
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2006 Apr; 86(14):961-4. PubMed ID: 16759535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Role of preoperative local and distant staging in rectal cancer.
Engelen SM; Beets GL; Beets-Tan RG
Onkologie; 2007 Mar; 30(3):141-5. PubMed ID: 17341902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of CT and MRI in the pre-operative staging of rectal adenocarcinoma and prediction of circumferential resection margin involvement by MRI.
Mathur P; Smith JJ; Ramsey C; Owen M; Thorpe A; Karim S; Burke C; Ramesh S; Dawson PM
Colorectal Dis; 2003 Sep; 5(5):396-401. PubMed ID: 12925069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A prospective comparison study for predicting circumferential resection margin between preoperative MRI and whole mount sections in mid-rectal cancer: significance of different scan planes.
Kim YW; Kim NK; Min BS; Kim H; Pyo J; Kim MJ; Cha SH
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2008 Jun; 34(6):648-54. PubMed ID: 17574368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Rectal cancer: local staging and assessment of lymph node involvement with endoluminal US, CT, and MR imaging--a meta-analysis.
Bipat S; Glas AS; Slors FJ; Zwinderman AH; Bossuyt PM; Stoker J
Radiology; 2004 Sep; 232(3):773-83. PubMed ID: 15273331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of mesorectal fascia in mid and low anterior rectal cancer using endorectal ultrasound is feasible and reliable: a comparison with MRI findings.
Granero-Castro P; Muñoz E; Frasson M; García-Granero A; Esclapez P; Campos S; Flor-Lorente B; Garcia-Granero E
Dis Colon Rectum; 2014 Jun; 57(6):709-14. PubMed ID: 24807595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Application of convolutional neural network to risk evaluation of positive circumferential resection margin of rectal cancer by magnetic resonance imaging].
Xu JH; Zhou XM; Ma JL; Liu SS; Zhang MS; Zheng XF; Zhang XY; Liu GW; Zhang XX; Lu Y; Wang DS
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2020 Jun; 23(6):572-577. PubMed ID: 32521977
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Magnetic resonance imaging in rectal cancer downstaged using neoadjuvant chemoradiation: accuracy of prediction of tumour stage and circumferential resection margin status.
Kulkarni T; Gollins S; Maw A; Hobson P; Byrne R; Widdowson D
Colorectal Dis; 2008 Jun; 10(5):479-89. PubMed ID: 18318754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Diagnostic precision of magnetic resonance imaging for preoperative prediction of the circumferential margin involvement in patients with rectal cancer.
Purkayastha S; Tekkis PP; Athanasiou T; Tilney HS; Darzi AW; Heriot AG
Colorectal Dis; 2007 Jun; 9(5):402-11. PubMed ID: 17504336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Progress of MRI in predicting the circumferential resection margin of rectal cancer: A narrative review.
Ma Y; Ma D; Xu X; Li J; Guan Z
Asian J Surg; 2024 May; 47(5):2122-2131. PubMed ID: 38331609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging in rectal cancer depends on location of the tumor.
Peschaud F; Cuenod CA; Benoist S; Julié C; Beauchet A; Siauve N; Taieb-Kasbi F; Penna C; Nordlinger B
Dis Colon Rectum; 2005 Aug; 48(8):1603-9. PubMed ID: 15937629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound to diagnose nodal invasion by rectal cancers: a meta-analysis and systematic review.
Puli SR; Reddy JB; Bechtold ML; Choudhary A; Antillon MR; Brugge WR
Ann Surg Oncol; 2009 May; 16(5):1255-65. PubMed ID: 19219506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluating rectal tumor staging with magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography, and endoluminal ultrasound: A meta-analysis.
Li XT; Zhang XY; Sun YS; Tang L; Cao K
Medicine (Baltimore); 2016 Nov; 95(44):e5333. PubMed ID: 27858916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Anorectal staging: is EUS necessary?
Cesmeli E
Minerva Med; 2014 Oct; 105(5):423-36. PubMed ID: 25000219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
