294 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16153000)
1. Assessment of hemodialysis adequacy by ionic dialysance: comparison to standard method of urea removal.
Racki S; Zaputović L; Maleta I; Grzetić M; Mavrić Z; Devcić B; Vujicić B
Ren Fail; 2005; 27(5):601-4. PubMed ID: 16153000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Assessment of haemodialysis adequacy by ionic dialysance: intra-patient variability of delivered treatment.
McIntyre CW; Lambie SH; Taal MW; Fluck RJ
Nephrol Dial Transplant; 2003 Mar; 18(3):559-63. PubMed ID: 12584279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Influence of the ionic dialysance monitor on Kt measurement in hemodialysis.
Maduell F; Vera M; Arias M; Serra N; Blasco M; Bergadá E; Fontsere N; Cases A; Campistol JM
Am J Kidney Dis; 2008 Jul; 52(1):85-92. PubMed ID: 18455852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Dialysis dose (Kt/V) and clearance variation sensitivity using measurement of ultraviolet-absorbance (on-line), blood urea, dialysate urea and ionic dialysance.
Uhlin F; Fridolin I; Magnusson M; Lindberg LG
Nephrol Dial Transplant; 2006 Aug; 21(8):2225-31. PubMed ID: 16611681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Continuous online monitoring of ionic dialysance allows modification of delivered hemodialysis treatment time.
Chesterton LJ; Priestman WS; Lambie SH; Fielding CA; Taal MW; Fluck RJ; McIntyre CW
Hemodial Int; 2006 Oct; 10(4):346-50. PubMed ID: 17014509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Online conductivity monitoring of dialysis adequacy versus Kt/V derived from urea reduction ratio: a prospective study from a Saudi Center.
Al Saran K; Sabry A; Abdulghafour M; Yehia A
Ren Fail; 2010 Jan; 32(1):36-40. PubMed ID: 20113264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Accuracy and clinical utility of dialysis dose measurement using online ionic dialysance.
Katopodis KP; Hoenich NA
Clin Nephrol; 2002 Mar; 57(3):215-20. PubMed ID: 11924753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Ionic dialysance as a method for the on-line monitoring of delivered dialysis without blood sampling.
Manzoni C; Di Filippo S; Corti M; Locatelli F
Nephrol Dial Transplant; 1996 Oct; 11(10):2023-30. PubMed ID: 8918717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Epoetin requirement does not depend on dialysis dose when Kt/N > 1.33 in patients on regular dialysis treatment with cellulosic membranes and adequate iron stores.
Movilli E; Cancarini GC; Vizzardi V; Camerini C; Brunori G; Cassamali S; Maiorca R
J Nephrol; 2003; 16(4):546-51. PubMed ID: 14696757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Use of ionic dialysance to calculate Kt/V in pediatric hemodialysis.
Marsenic O; Booker K; Studnicka K; Wilson D; Beck A; Swanson T; Henry D; Turman M
Hemodial Int; 2011 Oct; 15 Suppl 1():S2-8. PubMed ID: 22093596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Ionic dialysance: a new valid parameter for quantification of dialysis efficiency in acute renal failure?
Ridel C; Osman D; Mercadal L; Anguel N; Petitclerc T; Richard C; Vinsonneau C
Intensive Care Med; 2007 Mar; 33(3):460-5. PubMed ID: 17235509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Factors determining a low dose of haemodialysis as measured by ionic dialysance in critical patients with acute kidney injury.
Rosa-Diez G; Greloni G; Crucelegui M; Bedini-Roca M; Heredia-Martínez A; Coli ML; Giannasi S; San-Román E; Pizarro R; Belzitti C; Algranati S; Heguilen R
Nefrologia; 2012 May; 32(3):359-66. PubMed ID: 22535160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. On-line assessment of delivered dialysis dose.
Di Filippo S; Andrulli S; Manzoni C; Corti M; Locatelli F
Kidney Int; 1998 Jul; 54(1):263-7. PubMed ID: 9648087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Analysis of factors associated with variability in haemodialysis adequacy.
Lambie SH; Taal MW; Fluck RJ; McIntyre CW
Nephrol Dial Transplant; 2004 Feb; 19(2):406-12. PubMed ID: 14736966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [The monitoring of dialysis dose by ionic dialysance-based Kt reveals less dialysis adequacy than the Kt/V(UREA)-based measurement in critically ill patients with acute renal failure].
Serra Cabañas N; Barros Freiría X; Garro Martínez J; Blasco Pelícano M; Maduell Canals F; Torras Rabasa A; Poch López de Briñas E
Nefrologia; 2010; 30(2):232-5. PubMed ID: 20393623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Impact of targeting Kt instead of Kt/V.
Maduell F; Ramos R; Palomares I; Martín-Malo A; Molina M; Bustamante J; Pérez-García R; Grassmann A; Merello JI;
Nephrol Dial Transplant; 2013 Oct; 28(10):2595-603. PubMed ID: 24078643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Quantification of hemodialysis dose: what Kt/V
to choose?
Aatif T; Hassani K; Alayoud A; Zajjari Y; Maoujoud O; Benyahia M; Oualim Z
Int J Artif Organs; 2014 Jan; 37(1):29-38. PubMed ID: 24634332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Routine online assessment of dialysis dose: Ionic dialysance or UV-absorbance monitoring?
Petitclerc T; Ridel C
Semin Dial; 2021 Mar; 34(2):116-122. PubMed ID: 33529406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Eliminating the need for routine monthly postdialysis serum urea nitrogen measurement: A method for monitoring Kt/V and normalized protein catabolic rate using conductivity determined dialyzer clearance.
Daugirdas JT
Semin Dial; 2018 Nov; 31(6):633-636. PubMed ID: 30311270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Haemodialysis with on-line monitoring equipment: tools or toys?
Locatelli F; Buoncristiani U; Canaud B; Köhler H; Petitclerc T; Zucchelli P
Nephrol Dial Transplant; 2005 Jan; 20(1):22-33. PubMed ID: 15632348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
