180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16153026)
1. Faithful without care: the evolution of monogyny.
Fromhage L; Elgar MA; Schneider JM
Evolution; 2005 Jul; 59(7):1400-5. PubMed ID: 16153026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A model for the evolutionary maintenance of monogyny in spiders.
Fromhage L; McNamara JM; Houston AI
J Theor Biol; 2008 Feb; 250(3):524-31. PubMed ID: 18045619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Spontaneous male death and monogyny in the dark fishing spider.
Schwartz SK; Wagner WE; Hebets EA
Biol Lett; 2013 Aug; 9(4):20130113. PubMed ID: 23784928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Why do some animals mate with one partner rather than many? A review of causes and consequences of monogamy.
Kvarnemo C
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2018 Nov; 93(4):1795-1812. PubMed ID: 29687607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The eunuch phenomenon: adaptive evolution of genital emasculation in sexually dimorphic spiders.
Kuntner M; Agnarsson I; Li D
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2015 Feb; 90(1):279-96. PubMed ID: 24809822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The evolution of monogamy in response to partner scarcity.
Schacht R; Bell AV
Sci Rep; 2016 Sep; 6():32472. PubMed ID: 27600189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Monogamy in marine fishes.
Whiteman EA; Côte IM
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2004 May; 79(2):351-75. PubMed ID: 15191228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The evolution of male mate choice in insects: a synthesis of ideas and evidence.
Bonduriansky R
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2001 Aug; 76(3):305-39. PubMed ID: 11569787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Monogamy and the battle of the sexes.
Hosken DJ; Stockley P; Tregenza T; Wedell N
Annu Rev Entomol; 2009; 54():361-78. PubMed ID: 18793102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Males Can Benefit from Sexual Cannibalism Facilitated by Self-Sacrifice.
Schwartz SK; Wagner WE; Hebets EA
Curr Biol; 2016 Oct; 26(20):2794-2799. PubMed ID: 27720621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A mate to die for? A model of conditional monogyny in cannibalistic spiders.
Fromhage L; Schneider JM
Ecol Evol; 2012 Oct; 2(10):2577-87. PubMed ID: 23145342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Conflict over multiple-partner mating between males and females of the polygynandrous common lizards.
Fitze PS; Le Galliard JF; Federici P; Richard M; Clobert J
Evolution; 2005 Nov; 59(11):2451-9. PubMed ID: 16396185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Understanding promiscuity: when is seeking additional mates better than guarding an already found one?
Harts AM; Kokko H
Evolution; 2013 Oct; 67(10):2838-48. PubMed ID: 24094337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evolution of male and female choice in polyandrous systems.
Puurtinen M; Fromhage L
Proc Biol Sci; 2017 Mar; 284(1851):. PubMed ID: 28330914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An integrative view of sexual selection in Tribolium flour beetles.
Fedina TY; Lewis SM
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2008 May; 83(2):151-71. PubMed ID: 18429767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Rare polyandry and common monogamy in the firefly squid, Watasenia scintillans.
Sato N; Tsuda SI; Nur E Alam M; Sasanami T; Iwata Y; Kusama S; Inamura O; Yoshida MA; Hirohashi N
Sci Rep; 2020 Jul; 10(1):10962. PubMed ID: 32620906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Estimating genetic benefits of polyandry from experimental studies: a meta-analysis.
Slatyer RA; Mautz BS; Backwell PR; Jennions MD
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2012 Feb; 87(1):1-33. PubMed ID: 21545390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Sexual cannibalism as a female resistance trait: a new hypothesis.
Burke NW
Evolution; 2024 Mar; 78(4):612-623. PubMed ID: 38280203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Why is mutual mate choice not the norm? Operational sex ratios, sex roles and the evolution of sexually dimorphic and monomorphic signalling.
Kokko H; Johnstone RA
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2002 Mar; 357(1419):319-30. PubMed ID: 11958700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A model of the interaction between 'good genes' and direct benefits in courtship-feeding animals: when do males of high genetic quality invest less?
Bussière LF
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2002 Mar; 357(1419):309-17. PubMed ID: 11958699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
