These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16153590)

  • 1. Performance study on touch-pens size in three screen tasks.
    Wu FG; Luo S
    Appl Ergon; 2006 Mar; 37(2):149-58. PubMed ID: 16153590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Performance of the five-point grip pen in three screen-based tasks.
    Wu FG; Luo S
    Appl Ergon; 2006 Sep; 37(5):629-39. PubMed ID: 16476407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of pen design on drawing and writing performance.
    Goonetilleke RS; Hoffmann ER; Luximon A
    Appl Ergon; 2009 Mar; 40(2):292-301. PubMed ID: 18501332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Design and evaluation approach for increasing stability and performance of touch pens in screen handwriting tasks.
    Wu FG; Luo S
    Appl Ergon; 2006 May; 37(3):319-327. PubMed ID: 16143292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Usability of pointing devices for office applications in a moving off-road environment.
    Baldus T; Patterson P
    Appl Ergon; 2008 Nov; 39(6):671-7. PubMed ID: 18295185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fundamental study on the size and inter-key spacing of numeric keys for touch screen.
    Harada H; Katsuura T; Kikuchi Y
    J Hum Ergol (Tokyo); 1996 Dec; 25(2):167-74. PubMed ID: 9735596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Standing at a kiosk: effects of key size and spacing on touch screen numeric keypad performance and user preference.
    Colle H; Hiszem K
    Ergonomics; 2004 Oct; 47(13):1406-23. PubMed ID: 15513716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Innovation & evaluation of tangible direct manipulation digital drawing pens for children.
    Lee TH; Wu FG; Chen HT
    Appl Ergon; 2017 Apr; 60():207-219. PubMed ID: 28166879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Functional parameters, wrist posture deviations and comfort: A comparison between a computer mouse and a touch pen as input devices.
    Hemati K; Mirjalili S; Ghasemi MS; Abdolahian Y; Siroos R; Sanati P; Aghilinejad M; Dehghan N
    Work; 2020; 65(4):701-706. PubMed ID: 32333572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Text entry on handheld computers by older users.
    Wright P; Bartram C; Rogers N; Emslie H; Evans J; Wilson B; Belt S
    Ergonomics; 2000 Jun; 43(6):702-16. PubMed ID: 10902881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Touchscreen task efficiency and learnability in an electronic medical record at the point-of-care.
    Lewis ZL; Douglas GP; Monaco V; Crowley RS
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2010; 160(Pt 1):101-5. PubMed ID: 20841658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The performance of computer input devices in a vibration environment.
    Lin CJ; Liu CN; Chao CJ; Chen HJ
    Ergonomics; 2010 Apr; 53(4):478-90. PubMed ID: 20309744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of computer mouse gain and visual demand on mouse clicking performance and muscle activation in a young and elderly group of experienced computer users.
    Sandfeld J; Jensen BR
    Appl Ergon; 2005 Sep; 36(5):547-55. PubMed ID: 15950168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Bivariate pointing movements on large touch screens: investigating the validity of a refined Fitts' Law.
    Bützler J; Vetter S; Jochems N; Schlick CM
    Work; 2012; 41 Suppl 1():3526-32. PubMed ID: 22317256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A visual ergonomic evaluation of different screen types and screen technologies with respect to discrimination performance.
    Oetjen S; Ziefle M
    Appl Ergon; 2009 Jan; 40(1):69-81. PubMed ID: 18329628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of usability and patient preference for the new disposable insulin device Solostar versus Flexpen, lilly disposable pen, and a prototype pen: an open-label study.
    Haak T; Edelman S; Walter C; Lecointre B; Spollett G
    Clin Ther; 2007 Apr; 29(4):650-60. PubMed ID: 17617288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Design and validation of a desk-free and posture-independent input device.
    Lee YH; Su MC
    Appl Ergon; 2008 May; 39(3):399-406. PubMed ID: 18022139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Investigation of the performance of trackpoint and touchpads with varied right and left buttons function locations.
    Wu CF; Lai CC; Liu YK
    Appl Ergon; 2013 Mar; 44(2):312-20. PubMed ID: 23036721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Enhancement of operational efficiencies for people with high cervical spinal cord injuries using a flexible integrated pointing device apparatus.
    Chen CL; Chen HC; Cheng PT; Chen CY; Chen HC; Chou SW
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2006 Jun; 87(6):866-73. PubMed ID: 16731224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Basic study on the rectangular numeric keys for touch screen.
    Harada H; Katsuura T; Kikuchi Y
    J Hum Ergol (Tokyo); 1997 Jun; 26(1):77-82. PubMed ID: 10901992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.