These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

278 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16153678)

  • 21. Attention modulates responses to motion reversals in human visual cortex.
    Tata MS; Mason AL; Sutherland RJ
    Neuroreport; 2007 Aug; 18(13):1361-5. PubMed ID: 17762713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Attention and sensory gain control: a peripheral visual process?
    Handy TC; Khoe W
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2005 Dec; 17(12):1936-49. PubMed ID: 16356330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Visuospatial attention shifts by gaze and arrow cues: an ERP study.
    Hietanen JK; Leppänen JM; Nummenmaa L; Astikainen P
    Brain Res; 2008 Jun; 1215():123-36. PubMed ID: 18485332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Task switching and novelty processing activate a common neural network for cognitive control.
    Barcelo F; Escera C; Corral MJ; Periáñez JA
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Oct; 18(10):1734-48. PubMed ID: 17014377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Lateralized ERP components related to spatial orienting: discriminating the direction of attention from processing sensory aspects of the cue.
    Jongen EM; Smulders FT; Van der Heiden JS
    Psychophysiology; 2007 Nov; 44(6):968-86. PubMed ID: 17617171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Endogenous attention and illusory line motion depend on task set.
    Chica AB; Charras P; Lupiáñez J
    Vision Res; 2008 Sep; 48(21):2251-9. PubMed ID: 18639573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Semantic processing is affected in inhibition of return: evidence from an event-related potentials study.
    Zhang M; Zhang Y
    Neuroreport; 2007 Feb; 18(3):267-71. PubMed ID: 17314669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Feedforward and recurrent processing in scene segmentation: electroencephalography and functional magnetic resonance imaging.
    Scholte HS; Jolij J; Fahrenfort JJ; Lamme VA
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Nov; 20(11):2097-109. PubMed ID: 18416684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Contingent attentional capture by top-down control settings: converging evidence from event-related potentials.
    Lien MC; Ruthruff E; Goodin Z; Remington RW
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Jun; 34(3):509-30. PubMed ID: 18505320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Different effects of exogenous cues in a visual detection and discrimination task: delayed attention withdrawal and/or speeded motor inhibition?
    Van der Lubbe RH; Vogel RO; Postma A
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2005 Dec; 17(12):1829-40. PubMed ID: 16356322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Parvocellular and magnocellular contributions to the initial generators of the visual evoked potential: high-density electrical mapping of the "C1" component.
    Foxe JJ; Strugstad EC; Sehatpour P; Molholm S; Pasieka W; Schroeder CE; McCourt ME
    Brain Topogr; 2008 Sep; 21(1):11-21. PubMed ID: 18784997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Effects of the cholinergic agonist nicotine on reorienting of visual spatial attention and top-down attentional control.
    Thiel CM; Fink GR
    Neuroscience; 2008 Mar; 152(2):381-90. PubMed ID: 18272290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Temporal attention enhances early visual processing: a review and new evidence from event-related potentials.
    Correa A; Lupiáñez J; Madrid E; Tudela P
    Brain Res; 2006 Mar; 1076(1):116-28. PubMed ID: 16516173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Object-based attention determines dominance in binocular rivalry.
    Mitchell JF; Stoner GR; Reynolds JH
    Nature; 2004 May; 429(6990):410-3. PubMed ID: 15164062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Complex slow potential generators in a simplified attention paradigm.
    Basile LF; Brunetti EP; Pereira JF; Ballester G; Amaro E; Anghinah R; Ribeiro P; Piedade R; Gattaz WF
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2006 Aug; 61(2):149-57. PubMed ID: 16313987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Attentional modulation of unconscious "automatic" processes: evidence from event-related potentials in a masked priming paradigm.
    Kiefer M; Brendel D
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Feb; 18(2):184-98. PubMed ID: 16494680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Parallel networks operating across attentional deployment and motion processing: a multi-seed partial least squares fMRI study.
    Caplan JB; Luks TL; Simpson GV; Glaholt M; McIntosh AR
    Neuroimage; 2006 Feb; 29(4):1192-202. PubMed ID: 16236528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. An ERP study of preparatory and inhibitory mechanisms in a cued saccade task.
    Van der Stigchel S; Heslenfeld DJ; Theeuwes J
    Brain Res; 2006 Aug; 1105(1):32-45. PubMed ID: 16595127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Perceptual load affects spatial and nonspatial visual selection processes: an event-related brain potential study.
    Barnhardt J; Ritter W; Gomes H
    Neuropsychologia; 2008; 46(7):2071-8. PubMed ID: 18355882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Interactions between attention and perceptual grouping in human visual cortex.
    Khoe W; Freeman E; Woldorff MG; Mangun GR
    Brain Res; 2006 Mar; 1078(1):101-11. PubMed ID: 16500628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.