BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

563 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16154316)

  • 1. A meta-analysis of cleft maxillary osteotomy and distraction osteogenesis.
    Cheung LK; Chua HD
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 Jan; 35(1):14-24. PubMed ID: 16154316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Maxillary distraction complications in cleft patients].
    Jeblaoui Y; Morand B; Brix M; Lebeau J; Bettega G
    Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac; 2008 Sep; 109(4):218-24, discussion 224-5. PubMed ID: 18703208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Nonunion of the external maxillary distraction in cleft lip and palate: analysis of possible reasons.
    He D; Genecov DG; Barcelo R
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Oct; 68(10):2402-11. PubMed ID: 20605305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Maxillary distraction versus orthognathic surgery in cleft lip and palate patients: effects on speech and velopharyngeal function.
    Chua HD; Whitehill TL; Samman N; Cheung LK
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Jul; 39(7):633-40. PubMed ID: 20413269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Distraction or osteotomy for the correction of maxillary cleft deformities: which is better?
    Cheung LK; Chua HD; Bendeus M
    Ann R Australas Coll Dent Surg; 2004 Oct; 17():57-63. PubMed ID: 16479857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Maxillary distraction osteogenesis versus orthognathic surgery for cleft lip and palate patients.
    Kloukos D; Fudalej P; Sequeira-Byron P; Katsaros C
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2018 Aug; 8(8):CD010403. PubMed ID: 30095853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Long-term results in maxillary deficiency using intraoral devices.
    Rachmiel A; Aizenbud D; Peled M
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Jul; 34(5):473-9. PubMed ID: 16053864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The early psychological adjustment of cleft patients after maxillary distraction osteogenesis and conventional orthognathic surgery: a preliminary study.
    Cheung LK; Loh JS; Ho SM
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 Dec; 64(12):1743-50. PubMed ID: 17113440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Midfacial changes through distraction osteogenesis using a rigid external distraction system with retention plates in cleft lip and palate patients.
    Daimaruya T; Imai Y; Kochi S; Tachi M; Takano-Yamamoto T
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Jul; 68(7):1480-6. PubMed ID: 20417011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Le Fort I distraction using internal devices for maxillary hypoplasia in patients with cleft lip, palate, and alveolus: complications and their prevention and management.
    Mitsukawa N; Satoh K; Morishita T
    J Craniofac Surg; 2010 Sep; 21(5):1428-30. PubMed ID: 20856032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Advancement of the anterior maxilla by distraction (case report).
    Karakasis D; Hadjipetrou L
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2004 Jun; 32(3):150-4. PubMed ID: 15113572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Longitudinal dento-skeletal changes in UCLP patients following maxillary distraction osteogenesis using RED system.
    Suzuki EY; Motohashi N; Ohyama K
    J Med Dent Sci; 2004 Mar; 51(1):27-33. PubMed ID: 15137462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Vector alignment in maxillary distraction osteogenesis.
    Uckan S; Arman A; Bayram B; Celik E
    J Craniofac Surg; 2006 Sep; 17(5):992-7. PubMed ID: 17003631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Soft tissue changes from maxillary distraction osteogenesis versus orthognathic surgery in patients with cleft lip and palate--a randomized controlled clinical trial.
    Chua HD; Cheung LK
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Jul; 70(7):1648-58. PubMed ID: 21958662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Maxillary distraction complications in cleft patients.
    Jeblaoui Y; Morand B; Brix M; Lebeau J; Bettega G
    Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac; 2010 Jun; 111(3):e1-6. PubMed ID: 20553705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cleft maxillary distraction versus orthognathic surgery--which one is more stable in 5 years?
    Chua HD; Hägg MB; Cheung LK
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 Jun; 109(6):803-14. PubMed ID: 20299247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Speech outcome and velopharyngeal function in cleft palate: comparison of Le Fort I maxillary osteotomy and distraction osteogenesis--early results.
    Chanchareonsook N; Whitehill TL; Samman N
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2007 Jan; 44(1):23-32. PubMed ID: 17214524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Maxillary distraction osteogenesis using Le Fort I osteotomy without intraoperative down-fracture.
    Yamauchi K; Mitsugi M; Takahashi T
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 Jun; 35(6):493-8. PubMed ID: 16513321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Distraction osteogenesis of the cleft maxilla.
    Wong GB; Ciminello FS; Padwa BL
    Facial Plast Surg; 2008 Nov; 24(4):467-71. PubMed ID: 19034823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Distraction osteogenesis of the maxilla in cleft patients. Worth considering].
    Kalk WW; de Lange J; Jansma J; Raghoebar GM; Bierman MW
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 2004 Dec; 111(12):496-500. PubMed ID: 15646686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 29.