196 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16154374)
1. [Ultrasonographical predictive factors of ovarian response to stimulation prior to in vitro fertilization].
Ebrard-Charra S; Reyftmann L; Hédon B; Déchaud H
Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2005 Oct; 33(10):762-7. PubMed ID: 16154374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Use of the antral follicle count to predict the outcome of assisted reproductive technologies.
Chang MY; Chiang CH; Hsieh TT; Soong YK; Hsu KH
Fertil Steril; 1998 Mar; 69(3):505-10. PubMed ID: 9531887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The cohort of antral follicles measuring 2-6 mm reflects the quantitative status of ovarian reserve as assessed by serum levels of anti-Müllerian hormone and response to controlled ovarian stimulation.
Jayaprakasan K; Deb S; Batcha M; Hopkisson J; Johnson I; Campbell B; Raine-Fenning N
Fertil Steril; 2010 Oct; 94(5):1775-81. PubMed ID: 19931077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Correlation between serum inhibin B level after treatment with gonadotropin releasing hormone agonist and outcome of in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer].
Lin WQ; Yang HY; Lin JJ; Chen X; Ye BL
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2009 Apr; 44(4):260-2. PubMed ID: 19570462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Combining cycle day 7 follicle count with the basal antral follicle count improves the prediction of ovarian response.
Durmusoglu F; Elter K; Yoruk P; Erenus M
Fertil Steril; 2004 Apr; 81(4):1073-8. PubMed ID: 15066466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Antral follicle count and FSH concentration after clomiphene citrate challenge test in the prediction of ovarian response during IVF treatment.
Ng EH; Chan CC; Tang OS; Ho PC
Hum Reprod; 2005 Jun; 20(6):1647-54. PubMed ID: 15734749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A prospective assessment of the predictive value of basal antral follicles in in vitro fertilization cycles.
Frattarelli JL; Levi AJ; Miller BT; Segars JH
Fertil Steril; 2003 Aug; 80(2):350-5. PubMed ID: 12909498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Antral follicle count in clinical practice: analyzing clinical relevance.
Hsu A; Arny M; Knee AB; Bell C; Cook E; Novak AL; Grow DR
Fertil Steril; 2011 Feb; 95(2):474-9. PubMed ID: 20434151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The significance of antral follicle size prior to stimulation in predicting ovarian response in a multiple dose GnRH antagonist protocol.
Lai Q; Chen C; Zhang Z; Zhang S; Yu Q; Yang P; Hu J; Wang CY
Int J Clin Exp Pathol; 2013; 6(2):258-66. PubMed ID: 23330011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prediction of ovarian response and IVF/ICSI outcome by three-dimensional ultrasonography and power Doppler angiography.
Mercé LT; Barco MJ; Bau S; Troyano JM
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2007 May; 132(1):93-100. PubMed ID: 17329008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Prognostic value of some hormonal and ultrasound ovarian reserve tests].
Vladimirov Ia; Tacheva D; Blagoeva V
Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 2003; 42(5):14-20. PubMed ID: 14682007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone and recombinant luteinizing hormone versus recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone alone during GnRH antagonist ovarian stimulation in patients aged ≥35 years: a randomized controlled trial.
Vuong TN; Phung HT; Ho MT
Hum Reprod; 2015 May; 30(5):1188-95. PubMed ID: 25740882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Effect of domestic highly purified urinary follicle stimulating hormone on outcomes of in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer in controlled ovarian stimulation].
Ye H; Huang GN; Cao YX; Zhong Y; Huang YH; Zhu GJ; Zhou LM; Chen ZJ; Shi JZ; Zeng Y; Weng N; Huang XF; Yang J; Zhu YM; Li YP; Yi D; Zhuang GL
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Nov; 48(11):838-42. PubMed ID: 24444561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Anti-Mullerian Hormone (AMH) levels in serum and follicular fluid as predictors of ovarian response in stimulated (IVF and ICSI) cycles.
Tolikas A; Tsakos E; Gerou S; Prapas Y; Loufopoulos A
Hum Fertil (Camb); 2011 Dec; 14(4):246-53. PubMed ID: 22088130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The use of anti-Müllerian hormone and antral follicle count to predict the potential of oocytes and embryos.
Majumder K; Gelbaya TA; Laing I; Nardo LG
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2010 Jun; 150(2):166-70. PubMed ID: 20223579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A randomized comparison of two ovarian stimulation protocols with gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist cotreatment for in vitro fertilization commencing recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone on cycle day 2 or 5 with the standard long GnRH agonist protocol.
Hohmann FP; Macklon NS; Fauser BC
J Clin Endocrinol Metab; 2003 Jan; 88(1):166-73. PubMed ID: 12519847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Predictors of IVF outcome by three-dimensional ultrasound.
Kupesic S; Kurjak A
Hum Reprod; 2002 Apr; 17(4):950-5. PubMed ID: 11925388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A randomised controlled trial of 300 versus 225 IU recombinant FSH for ovarian stimulation in predicted normal responders by antral follicle count.
Jayaprakasan K; Hopkisson J; Campbell B; Johnson I; Thornton J; Raine-Fenning N
BJOG; 2010 Jun; 117(7):853-62. PubMed ID: 20353458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Monitoring of in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer cycles by ultrasound versus by ultrasound and hormonal levels: a prospective, multicenter, randomized study.
Lass A;
Fertil Steril; 2003 Jul; 80(1):80-5. PubMed ID: 12849805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Correlations between antral follicle count and ultrasonographic ovarian parameters and clinical variables and outcomes in IVF cycles.
Ben-Haroush A; Farhi J; Zahalka Y; Sapir O; Meizner I; Fisch B
Gynecol Endocrinol; 2012 Jun; 28(6):432-5. PubMed ID: 22122694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
