130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16154866)
1. Effect of changes in cruciate ligaments pretensions on knee joint laxity and ligament forces.
Shirazi-Adl A; Moglo KE
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2005 Feb; 8(1):17-24. PubMed ID: 16154866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. On the coupling between anterior and posterior cruciate ligaments, and knee joint response under anterior femoral drawer in flexion: a finite element study.
Moglo KE; Shirazi-Adl A
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2003 Oct; 18(8):751-9. PubMed ID: 12957562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cruciate coupling and screw-home mechanism in passive knee joint during extension--flexion.
Moglo KE; Shirazi-Adl A
J Biomech; 2005 May; 38(5):1075-83. PubMed ID: 15797589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A sagittal plane model of the knee and cruciate ligaments with application of a sensitivity analysis.
Beynnon B; Yu J; Huston D; Fleming B; Johnson R; Haugh L; Pope MH
J Biomech Eng; 1996 May; 118(2):227-39. PubMed ID: 8738789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Biomechanical consequences of replacement of the anterior cruciate ligament with a patellar ligament allograft. Part II: forces in the graft compared with forces in the intact ligament.
Markolf KL; Burchfield DM; Shapiro MM; Cha CW; Finerman GA; Slauterbeck JL
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1996 Nov; 78(11):1728-34. PubMed ID: 8934489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Biomechanics of changes in ACL and PCL material properties or prestrains in flexion under muscle force-implications in ligament reconstruction.
Mesfar W; Shirazi-Adl A
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2006 Aug; 9(4):201-9. PubMed ID: 17132528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Posterior cruciate ligament graft fixation angles, part 1: biomechanical evaluation for anatomic single-bundle reconstruction.
Kennedy NI; LaPrade RF; Goldsmith MT; Faucett SC; Rasmussen MT; Coatney GA; Engebretsen L; Wijdicks CA
Am J Sports Med; 2014 Oct; 42(10):2338-45. PubMed ID: 25091117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. An inverse dynamics modeling approach to determine the restraining function of human knee ligament bundles.
Mommersteeg TJ; Huiskes R; Blankevoort L; Kooloos JG; Kauer JM
J Biomech; 1997 Feb; 30(2):139-46. PubMed ID: 9001934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Coordination of the anterior and posterior cruciate ligaments in constraining the varus-valgus and internal-external rotatory instability of the knee.
Miyasaka T; Matsumoto H; Suda Y; Otani T; Toyama Y
J Orthop Sci; 2002; 7(3):348-53. PubMed ID: 12077660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Bi-unicondylar knee replacement laxity with changes to simulated soft tissue constraints.
Roach BL; Matheny JB; Spinelli M; Rusly RJ; Affatato S; DesJardins JD
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2013 Jan; 227(1):27-36. PubMed ID: 23516953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Biomechanical consequences of replacement of the anterior cruciate ligament with a patellar ligament allograft. Part I: insertion of the graft and anterior-posterior testing.
Markolf KL; Burchfield DM; Shapiro MM; Davis BR; Finerman GA; Slauterbeck JL
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1996 Nov; 78(11):1720-7. PubMed ID: 8934488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Posteromedial Meniscocapsular Lesions Increase Tibiofemoral Joint Laxity With Anterior Cruciate Ligament Deficiency, and Their Repair Reduces Laxity.
Stephen JM; Halewood C; Kittl C; Bollen SR; Williams A; Amis AA
Am J Sports Med; 2016 Feb; 44(2):400-8. PubMed ID: 26657852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A biomechanical study of replacement of the posterior cruciate ligament with a graft. Part II: Forces in the graft compared with forces in the intact ligament.
Markolf KL; Slauterbeck JR; Armstrong KL; Shapiro MS; Finerman GA
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1997 Mar; 79(3):381-6. PubMed ID: 9070527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Three-week joint immobilization increases anterior-posterior laxity without alterations in mechanical properties of the anterior cruciate ligament in the rat knee.
Kaneguchi A; Ozawa J; Minamimoto K; Yamaoka K
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2020 May; 75():104993. PubMed ID: 32298871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and cartilage contact forces--A 3D computational simulation.
Wang L; Lin L; Feng Y; Fernandes TL; Asnis P; Hosseini A; Li G
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2015 Dec; 30(10):1175-80. PubMed ID: 26320976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects of the posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction on the biomechanics of the knee joint: a finite element analysis.
Ramaniraka NA; Terrier A; Theumann N; Siegrist O
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2005 May; 20(4):434-42. PubMed ID: 15737452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Posterior cruciate ligament graft fixation angles, part 2: biomechanical evaluation for anatomic double-bundle reconstruction.
Kennedy NI; LaPrade RF; Goldsmith MT; Faucett SC; Rasmussen MT; Coatney GA; Engebretsen L; Wijdicks CA
Am J Sports Med; 2014 Oct; 42(10):2346-55. PubMed ID: 25091116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Lateral laxity in flexion increases the postoperative flexion angle in cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty.
Kobayashi T; Suzuki M; Sasho T; Nakagawa K; Tsuneizumi Y; Takahashi K
J Arthroplasty; 2012 Feb; 27(2):260-5. PubMed ID: 21752588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A biomechanical comparison of tibial inlay and tibial tunnel posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction techniques: graft pretension and knee laxity.
McAllister DR; Markolf KL; Oakes DA; Young CR; McWilliams J
Am J Sports Med; 2002; 30(3):312-7. PubMed ID: 12016068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A biomechanical study of replacement of the posterior cruciate ligament with a graft. Part 1: Isometry, pre-tension of the graft, and anterior-posterior laxity.
Markolf KL; Slauterbeck JR; Armstrong KL; Shapiro MS; Finerman GA
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1997 Mar; 79(3):375-80. PubMed ID: 9070526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
