These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16155698)

  • 1. [Analysis of the efficacy of Twin-block appliance on maxillofacial growth of six pairs of monozygotic twins].
    Ji GP; Pan XG; Shen G; Huang N
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2005 Aug; 14(4):359-64. PubMed ID: 16155698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cephalometric evaluation of the effects of the Twin Block appliance in subjects with Class II, Division 1 malocclusion amongst different cervical vertebral maturation stages.
    Khoja A; Fida M; Shaikh A
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2016 Jun; 21(3):73-84. PubMed ID: 27409656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Treatment of Angle Class II division I malocclusion cases with Twin-block appliance combined with face bow and intermaxillary elastic: report of 17 cases].
    Gong X; Qian YF
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2005 Aug; 14(4):365-9. PubMed ID: 16155699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A cephalometric analysis of six Twin Block patients. A study of mandibular (body and ramus) growth and development.
    Stangl DP
    Funct Orthod; 1997; 14(2):4-6, 8-14, 17-9 passim. PubMed ID: 9610277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Skeletal and dentoalveolar changes concurrent to use of Twin Block appliance in class II division I cases with a deficient mandible: a cephalometric study.
    Sharma AK; Sachdev V; Singla A; Kirtaniya BC
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2012; 30(3):218-26. PubMed ID: 23263425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Skeletal and dentoalveolar effects of Twin-block and bionator appliances in the treatment of Class II malocclusion: a comparative study.
    Jena AK; Duggal R; Parkash H
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Nov; 130(5):594-602. PubMed ID: 17110256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Effect of Twin-block appliance in the treatment of Class II and division I malocclusion: a cephalometric study in 12 patients].
    Luo Y; Fang G
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2005 Feb; 14(1):90-3. PubMed ID: 15747025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of modified twin block appliance in growing Class II high angle cases: A cephalometric study.
    Jha K; Adhikari M
    F1000Res; 2022; 11():459. PubMed ID: 38680231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Treatment effects of the R-appliance and twin block in Class II division 1 malocclusion.
    Jamilian A; Showkatbakhsh R; Amiri SS
    Eur J Orthod; 2011 Aug; 33(4):354-8. PubMed ID: 20956385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparision of Twin-block and Forsus (FRD) functional appliance--a cephalometric study.
    Mahamad IK; Neela PK; Mascarenhas R; Husain A
    Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2012; 23(3):49-58. PubMed ID: 23094559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cephalometric changes in pharyngeal airway dimensions after functional treatment with twin block versus myobrace appliances in developing skeletal class II patients: a randomized clinical trial.
    Madian AM; Elfouly D
    BMC Oral Health; 2023 Dec; 23(1):998. PubMed ID: 38093237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Treatment timing for Twin-block therapy.
    Baccetti T; Franchi L; Toth LR; McNamara JA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Aug; 118(2):159-70. PubMed ID: 10935956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [An eight-factor analysis of early skeletal Class II malocclusion using Fränkel appliance].
    Lai W; Lu S; Huang N; Zhao M
    Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 1999 Aug; 17(3):271-4. PubMed ID: 12539305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [A cephalometric study on Twin-block appliance for treatment of early skeletal Class II malocclusion].
    Liu Y; Liu YH
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2005 Dec; 14(6):569-72. PubMed ID: 16400480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Posttreatment changes after successful correction of Class II malocclusions with the twin block appliance.
    Mills CM; McCulloch KJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Jul; 118(1):24-33. PubMed ID: 10893470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparative Evaluation of Twin Block Appliance and Fixed Orthodontic Appliance in Early Class II Malocclusion Treatment: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Radwan ES; Maher A; Montasser MA
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2022 Nov; 23(11):1111-1121. PubMed ID: 37073934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Clinical effectiveness of the Twin block appliance in the treatment of Class II Division 1 malocclusion.
    Sidlauskas A
    Stomatologija; 2005; 7(1):7-10. PubMed ID: 16254470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Efficacy evaluation of fixed Twin-block appliance and tooth extraction in skeletal Class II malocclusion].
    Gong Y; Yu Q; Li PL; Wang HH; Wei B; Shen G
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2014 Oct; 23(5):597-600. PubMed ID: 25543606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An evaluation of maxillary and mandibular rotational responses with the Clark twin block appliance.
    Lau EY; Sampson WJ; Townsend GC; Hughes T
    Aust Orthod J; 2009 May; 25(1):48-58. PubMed ID: 19634464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Stability of Class II treatment with an edgewise crowned Herbst appliance in the early mixed dentition: Skeletal and dental changes.
    Wigal TG; Dischinger T; Martin C; Razmus T; Gunel E; Ngan P
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Aug; 140(2):210-23. PubMed ID: 21803259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.