These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

89 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16156183)

  • 1. Influence of multiple categories on the prediction of unknown properties.
    Verde MF; Murphy GL; Ross BH
    Mem Cognit; 2005 Apr; 33(3):479-87. PubMed ID: 16156183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Category-related brain activity to natural categories is associated with the retrieval of visual features: Evidence from repetition effects during visual and functional judgments.
    Sim EJ; Kiefer M
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Jul; 24(2):260-73. PubMed ID: 15993764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Categorizing with overlapping categories.
    Brownell HH; Caramazza A
    Mem Cognit; 1978 Sep; 6(5):481-90. PubMed ID: 24203380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Feature taxonomy: What type of features do children associate with categories and how do they fare in predicting category judgments?
    Djalal FM; Storms G; Ameel E; Heyman T
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2017 Jul; 178():114-123. PubMed ID: 28549663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Implicit and explicit processes in category-based induction: is induction best when we don't think?
    Chen SY; Ross BH; Murphy GL
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2014 Feb; 143(1):227-46. PubMed ID: 23506087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Shapes, scents and sounds: quantifying the full multi-sensory basis of conceptual knowledge.
    Hoffman P; Lambon Ralph MA
    Neuropsychologia; 2013 Jan; 51(1):14-25. PubMed ID: 23159700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Confidence and gradedness in semantic categorization: definitely somewhat artifactual, maybe absolutely natural.
    Estes Z
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2004 Dec; 11(6):1041-7. PubMed ID: 15875973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The role of categorical information in processing relational attributes.
    Sailor KM; Shoben EJ
    Mem Cognit; 1996 Nov; 24(6):756-65. PubMed ID: 8961820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Food for thought: cross-classification and category organization in a complex real-world domain.
    Ross BH; Murphy GL
    Cogn Psychol; 1999 Jun; 38(4):495-553. PubMed ID: 10334879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Category-based predictions: influence of uncertainty and feature associations.
    Ross BH; Murphy GL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1996 May; 22(3):736-53. PubMed ID: 8656154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Organisation and evocation of the semantic knowledge: a non-abstractive approach.
    Atzeni T; Carbonnel S
    Brain Cogn; 2004 Jul; 55(2):237-9. PubMed ID: 15177786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The influence of labels associated with anchor points of Likert-type response scales in survey questionnaires.
    Blais JG; Grondin J
    J Appl Meas; 2011; 12(4):370-86. PubMed ID: 22357158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Probability assessment with response times and confidence in perception and knowledge.
    Petrusic WM; Baranski JV
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2009 Feb; 130(2):103-14. PubMed ID: 19081556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Uncovering contrast categories in categorization with a probabilistic threshold model.
    Verheyen S; De Deyne S; Dry MJ; Storms G
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Nov; 37(6):1515-31. PubMed ID: 21767056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Does the semantic content of verbal categories influence categorical perception? An ERP study.
    Maier M; Glage P; Hohlfeld A; Abdel Rahman R
    Brain Cogn; 2014 Nov; 91():1-10. PubMed ID: 25163810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Top-down effects of semantic knowledge in visual search are modulated by cognitive but not perceptual load.
    Belke E; Humphreys GW; Watson DG; Meyer AS; Telling AL
    Percept Psychophys; 2008 Nov; 70(8):1444-58. PubMed ID: 19064489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Category labels versus feature labels: category labels polarize inferential predictions.
    Yamauchi T; Yu NY
    Mem Cognit; 2008 Apr; 36(3):544-53. PubMed ID: 18491494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Nature and facts about natural and artifactual categories: Sex differences in the semantic priming paradigm.
    Bermeitinger C; Wentura D; Frings C
    Brain Lang; 2008 Aug; 106(2):153-63. PubMed ID: 18442848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. ERP signs of categorical and supra-categorical processing of visual information.
    Zani A; Marsili G; Senerchia A; Orlandi A; Citron FM; Rizzi E; Proverbio AM
    Biol Psychol; 2015 Jan; 104():90-107. PubMed ID: 25447739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Perceptual and semantic sources of category-specific effects: event-related potentials during picture and word categorization.
    Kiefer M
    Mem Cognit; 2001 Jan; 29(1):100-16. PubMed ID: 11277454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.