These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16156205)

  • 1. Broiler breeding strategies using indirect carcass measurements.
    Zerehdaran S; Vereijken AL; van Arendonk JA; Bovenhuis H; van der Waaij EH
    Poult Sci; 2005 Aug; 84(8):1214-21. PubMed ID: 16156205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Genetic and economic evaluation of Japanese Black (Wagyu) cattle breeding schemes.
    Kahi AK; Hirooka H
    J Anim Sci; 2005 Sep; 83(9):2021-32. PubMed ID: 16100056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Benefits of testing in both bio-secure and production environments in genomic selection breeding programs for commercial broiler chicken.
    Chu TT; Alemu SW; Norberg E; Sørensen AC; Henshall J; Hawken R; Jensen J
    Genet Sel Evol; 2018 Nov; 50(1):52. PubMed ID: 30390619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Mating structures for genomic selection breeding programs in aquaculture.
    Sonesson AK; Ødegård J
    Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Jun; 48(1):46. PubMed ID: 27342705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Accuracy of genomic prediction for growth and carcass traits in Chinese triple-yellow chickens.
    Liu T; Qu H; Luo C; Shu D; Wang J; Lund MS; Su G
    BMC Genet; 2014 Oct; 15():110. PubMed ID: 25316160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Optimised parent selection and minimum inbreeding mating in small aquaculture breeding schemes: a simulation study.
    Hely FS; Amer PR; Walker SP; Symonds JE
    Animal; 2013 Jan; 7(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 23031385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Genomic selection for two traits in a maternal pig breeding scheme.
    Lillehammer M; Meuwissen TH; Sonesson AK
    J Anim Sci; 2013 Jul; 91(7):3079-87. PubMed ID: 23658351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Deterministic models of breeding scheme designs that incorporate genomic selection.
    Pryce JE; Goddard ME; Raadsma HW; Hayes BJ
    J Dairy Sci; 2010 Nov; 93(11):5455-66. PubMed ID: 20965361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Genomic selection strategies to improve maternal traits in Norwegian White Sheep.
    Lillehammer M; Sonesson AK; Klemetsdal G; Blichfeldt T; Meuwissen THE
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2020 Jul; 137(4):384-394. PubMed ID: 32236991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Testing strategies for genomic selection in aquaculture breeding programs.
    Sonesson AK; Meuwissen TH
    Genet Sel Evol; 2009 Jun; 41(1):37. PubMed ID: 19566932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessing genetic gain, inbreeding, and bias attributable to different flock genetic means in alternative sheep sire referencing schemes.
    Kuehn LA; Notter DR; Lewis RM
    J Anim Sci; 2008 Mar; 86(3):526-35. PubMed ID: 18073281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Optimum contribution selection using traditional best linear unbiased prediction and genomic breeding values in aquaculture breeding schemes.
    Nielsen HM; Sonesson AK; Meuwissen TH
    J Anim Sci; 2011 Mar; 89(3):630-8. PubMed ID: 21036937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Efficiency of genomic selection in a purebred pig male line.
    Tribout T; Larzul C; Phocas F
    J Anim Sci; 2012 Dec; 90(12):4164-76. PubMed ID: 22859761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Indirect genetic effects and inbreeding: consequences of BLUP selection for socially affected traits on rate of inbreeding.
    Khaw HL; Ponzoni RW; Bijma P
    Genet Sel Evol; 2014 Jun; 46(1):39. PubMed ID: 24961990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Genomic selection for maternal traits in pigs.
    Lillehammer M; Meuwissen TH; Sonesson AK
    J Anim Sci; 2011 Dec; 89(12):3908-16. PubMed ID: 21841086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Genetic and phenotypic parameters of carcass and organ traits of broiler chickens.
    Venturini GC; Cruz VA; Rosa JO; Baldi F; El Faro L; Ledur MC; Peixoto JO; Munari DP
    Genet Mol Res; 2014 Dec; 13(4):10294-300. PubMed ID: 25501241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The use of communal rearing of families and DNA pooling in aquaculture genomic selection schemes.
    Sonesson AK; Meuwissen TH; Goddard ME
    Genet Sel Evol; 2010 Nov; 42(1):41. PubMed ID: 21092198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of genomic selection on genetic improvement, inbreeding, and merit of young versus proven bulls.
    de Roos AP; Schrooten C; Veerkamp RF; van Arendonk JA
    J Dairy Sci; 2011 Mar; 94(3):1559-67. PubMed ID: 21338821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Correlative responses for carcass and meat quality traits to selection for ovulation rate or prenatal survival in French Large White pigs.
    Rosendo A; Druet T; Péry C; Bidanel JP
    J Anim Sci; 2010 Mar; 88(3):903-11. PubMed ID: 19966169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. From phenotyping towards breeding strategies: using in vivo indicator traits and genetic markers to improve meat quality in an endangered pig breed.
    Biermann AD; Yin T; König von Borstel UU; Rübesam K; Kuhn B; König S
    Animal; 2015 Jun; 9(6):919-27. PubMed ID: 25690016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.