These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

81 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1615640)

  • 1. The supply of mammography resources in West Virginia.
    Artz DR; Brown ML; Barrett MJ
    W V Med J; 1992 Apr; 88(4):142-6. PubMed ID: 1615640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. From high tech to high touch: integrating community voices in mobile mammography outreach.
    Kennedy S; Stephens S; Tephabock K; Brown P; Davis P; Keresztury J; Narsavage G
    W V Med J; 2009 Oct; 105 Spec No():74-7. PubMed ID: 19999271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Mammography in West Virginia.
    Pearson RJ
    Am J Prev Med; 1993; 9(3):181-4. PubMed ID: 8347370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Screening mammography in the Tampa Bay area: current status and implications for the next decade.
    Clark RA; King PS; Cox CE; Bromley J; Mauer K
    J Fla Med Assoc; 1989 May; 76(5):449-53. PubMed ID: 2614349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Accreditation of mammography facilities by the American College of Radiology: results of a national survey.
    Brown ML; Fintor L
    Am J Prev Med; 1994; 10(3):162-7. PubMed ID: 7917443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Economic and organizational aspects of technical equipment for mammography].
    Kochetova GP; Rozhkova NI
    Med Tekh; 1988; (3):26-31. PubMed ID: 3419310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Digital detectors in mammography. A technological overview.
    Dhaenens F
    JBR-BTR; 2000 Apr; 83(2):84-7. PubMed ID: 10859905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Variability in the interpretation of screening mammograms by US radiologists. Findings from a national sample.
    Beam CA; Layde PM; Sullivan DC
    Arch Intern Med; 1996 Jan; 156(2):209-13. PubMed ID: 8546556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Census of radiological machines in Radiodiagnostic Services of public and recognized hospitals in the Campania Region.
    Cappabianca S; De Rosa R; Greco M; Accarino B; Del Vecchio A; Grassi R
    Radiol Med; 2002 Sep; 104(3):213-23. PubMed ID: 12471369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The distribution of West Virginia women targeted for screening of breast and cervical cancers.
    German RR
    W V Med J; 1996; 92(2):82-6. PubMed ID: 8857175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Quality and safety are more important than price when buying radiologic equipment].
    Tidebrant G; Lukes P; Wihed A
    Lakartidningen; 1992 Feb; 89(8):550-1. PubMed ID: 1740947
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Quality control in mammography. Everyone has a role. American College of Radiology.
    Haus A
    Adm Radiol; 1992 Nov; 11(11):123, 125-6, 129-30. PubMed ID: 10123210
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Current malaria situation in the Republic of Kazakhstan].
    Bismil'din FB; Shapieva ZhZh; Anpilova EN
    Med Parazitol (Mosk); 2001; (1):24-33. PubMed ID: 11548308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A model-based comparison of breast cancer screening strategies: mammograms and clinical breast examinations.
    Shen Y; Parmigiani G
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2005 Feb; 14(2):529-32. PubMed ID: 15734983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. MQSA: thou shalt raise mammography quality.
    Bieze J
    Diagn Imaging (San Franc); 1994 Sep; 16(9):51-5, 57. PubMed ID: 10150903
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Is the supply of mammography machines outstripping need and demand? An economic analysis.
    Brown ML; Kessler LG; Rueter FG
    Ann Intern Med; 1990 Oct; 113(7):547-52. PubMed ID: 2393209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Breast cancer screening policies in developing countries: a cost-effectiveness analysis for India.
    Okonkwo QL; Draisma G; der Kinderen A; Brown ML; de Koning HJ
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2008 Sep; 100(18):1290-300. PubMed ID: 18780864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Utilization of screening mammography by primary care physicians.
    O'Leary TJ; deParedes ES; Tritschler J; Barr M
    Appl Radiol; 1989 Dec; 18(12):28-33. PubMed ID: 10304414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Completion of colorectal cancer screening in women attending screening mammography.
    Molina L; Carlos RC; Mark Fendrick A; Abrahamse PH; Dong Q; Bernstein SJ
    Acad Radiol; 2004 Nov; 11(11):1237-41. PubMed ID: 15561570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mammography screening: successes and problems in implementing widespread use in the United States.
    Gold RH; Bassett LW; Fox SA
    Radiol Clin North Am; 1987 Sep; 25(5):1039-46. PubMed ID: 3628751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.