These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1615695)

  • 1. WIPRO and the justification of existence.
    Mayersak JS
    Wis Med J; 1992 Mar; 91(3):120-1. PubMed ID: 1615695
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. WIPRO clarifies changes to quality review process.
    Wis Med J; 1993 Aug; 92(8):479. PubMed ID: 8237040
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Out of the shadows: Professional Standards Committee hearings.
    Gorman RF
    Med J Aust; 2002 Apr; 176(8):399; author reply 400. PubMed ID: 12041639
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Invited article: professionalism in neurology: the role of law.
    Larriviere D; Beresford HR
    Neurology; 2008 Oct; 71(16):1283-8. PubMed ID: 18852444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. MetaStar's health care and culture project: does your clinic meet federal standards?
    Gold JA; Michalowski K
    WMJ; 2006 Sep; 105(6):61-2. PubMed ID: 17042425
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comprehensive health care review is legislative priority.
    DiFrancesco DT
    N J Med; 2000 May; 97(5):27-8. PubMed ID: 10832362
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Discuss WIPRO letters with patients.
    Peterson DT
    Wis Med J; 1993 Mar; 92(3):124. PubMed ID: 8465538
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Overhauling Medicare's quality assurance program.
    Frank KM
    Nurs Econ; 1990; 8(2):68, 82. PubMed ID: 2184373
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Quality assurance and medical stupidity.
    Glover JL
    Am Surg; 1991 Aug; 57(8):475-80. PubMed ID: 1928988
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Quo vademus? A review of the regulatory environment.
    Huss H; Hutchison R
    Qual Assur; 1995 Sep; 4(3):181-6. PubMed ID: 8705113
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. MetaStar set to undertake new quality initiatives.
    Gold JA; Spurlin D
    WMJ; 1999 Dec; 98(8):57-8. PubMed ID: 10639899
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Is WIPRO the best we can do?
    Murdock DK
    Wis Med J; 1993 Dec; 92(12):666-7. PubMed ID: 8109125
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. New developments at the Connecticut Peer Review Organization.
    Meehan TP
    Conn Med; 1993 Aug; 57(8):533-5. PubMed ID: 8243082
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Setting the standard? New Zealand's approach to ensuring health and disability services of an appropriate standard.
    Godbold R; McCallin A
    J Law Med; 2005 Aug; 13(1):125-34. PubMed ID: 16117161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An overview of Wisconsin Medicaid quality.
    Hladilek MK; Howe MJ; Carr RM
    WMJ; 2004; 103(3):58-62. PubMed ID: 15217117
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Professional standards review organizations: a new concept in dental continuing education.
    Cahn EA
    J Acad Gen Dent; 1975; 23(6):28-9. PubMed ID: 1065665
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Criteria and the PSRO program.
    Zelinger G; Stephens S
    QRB Qual Rev Bull; 1980 Aug; 6(8):16-9. PubMed ID: 6776468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. MetaStar: Wisconsin's quality improvement organization.
    Gold JA; Simmons K
    WMJ; 2006 Dec; 105(8):38-9. PubMed ID: 17256707
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The health care quality improvement program.
    Gold JA; Heuer BD
    Wis Med J; 1994 May; 93(5):219-22. PubMed ID: 8053226
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Antitrust law: a remedy for poor peer review.
    Peacock EE
    Bull Am Coll Surg; 1996 Mar; 81(3):35-40. PubMed ID: 10156758
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.