These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16157257)

  • 1. Increased power to detect gene-environment interaction using siblings controls.
    Andrieu N; Dondon MG; Goldstein AM
    Ann Epidemiol; 2005 Oct; 15(9):705-11. PubMed ID: 16157257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The case-combined-control design was efficient in detecting gene-environment interactions.
    Andrieu N; Goldstein AM
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2004 Jul; 57(7):662-71. PubMed ID: 15358394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Case-parents design for gene-environment interaction.
    Schaid DJ
    Genet Epidemiol; 1999; 16(3):261-73. PubMed ID: 10096689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Exploiting gene-environment independence in family-based case-control studies: increased power for detecting associations, interactions and joint effects.
    Chatterjee N; Kalaylioglu Z; Carroll RJ
    Genet Epidemiol; 2005 Feb; 28(2):138-56. PubMed ID: 15593088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sample size needed to detect gene-gene interactions using linkage analysis.
    Wang S; Zhao H
    Ann Hum Genet; 2007 Nov; 71(Pt 6):828-42. PubMed ID: 17521308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sequential tests for gene-environment interactions in matched case-control studies.
    Tweel Iv; Schipper M
    Stat Med; 2004 Dec; 23(24):3755-71. PubMed ID: 15580604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Study design options in evaluating gene-environment interactions: practical considerations for a planned case-control study of pediatric leukemia.
    Goodman M; Dana Flanders W
    Pediatr Blood Cancer; 2007 Apr; 48(4):375-9. PubMed ID: 16874764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Tests for gene-environment interaction from case-control data: a novel study of type I error, power and designs.
    Mukherjee B; Ahn J; Gruber SB; Rennert G; Moreno V; Chatterjee N
    Genet Epidemiol; 2008 Nov; 32(7):615-26. PubMed ID: 18473390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Detecting gene-environment interactions using a case-control design.
    Goldstein AM; Falk RT; Korczak JF; Lubin JH
    Genet Epidemiol; 1997; 14(6):1085-9. PubMed ID: 9433628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Potential gain in efficiency and power to detect gene-environment interactions by matching in case-control studies.
    Stürmer T; Brenner H
    Genet Epidemiol; 2000 Jan; 18(1):63-80. PubMed ID: 10603459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Testing linkage and gene x environment interaction: comparison of different affected sib-pair methods.
    Dizier MH; Selinger-Leneman H; Genin E
    Genet Epidemiol; 2003 Jul; 25(1):73-9. PubMed ID: 12813728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sample size requirements for indirect association studies of gene-environment interactions (G x E).
    Hein R; Beckmann L; Chang-Claude J
    Genet Epidemiol; 2008 Apr; 32(3):235-45. PubMed ID: 18163529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Two-stage analysis for gene-environment interaction utilizing both case-only and family-based analysis.
    Chen YH; Lin HW; Liu H
    Genet Epidemiol; 2009 Feb; 33(2):95-104. PubMed ID: 18636478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. QTL mapping with discordant and concordant sibling pairs: new statistics and new design strategies.
    Szatkiewicz JP; Feingold E
    Genet Epidemiol; 2005 May; 28(4):326-40. PubMed ID: 15662636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Genetic dissection methods: designs used for tests of gene-environment interaction.
    Liu X; Fallin MD; Kao WH
    Curr Opin Genet Dev; 2004 Jun; 14(3):241-5. PubMed ID: 15172665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Joint effect of genes and environment distorted by selection biases: implications for hospital-based case-control studies.
    Wacholder S; Chatterjee N; Hartge P
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2002 Sep; 11(9):885-9. PubMed ID: 12223433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Further considerations for power in sibling interaction models.
    Neale BM; Rijsdijk FV
    Behav Genet; 2005 Sep; 35(5):671-4. PubMed ID: 16184493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Unconditional analyses can increase efficiency in assessing gene-environment interaction of the case-combined-control design.
    Goldstein AM; Dondon MG; Andrieu N
    Int J Epidemiol; 2006 Aug; 35(4):1067-73. PubMed ID: 16556643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The impact of genotype misclassification errors on the power to detect a gene-environment interaction using cox proportional hazards modeling.
    Tung L; Gordon D; Finch SJ
    Hum Hered; 2007; 63(2):101-10. PubMed ID: 17283439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Feasibility of half-sibling designs for detecting a genetic component to a disease.
    Tierney C; Merikangas KR; Risch N
    Genet Epidemiol; 1994; 11(6):523-38. PubMed ID: 7713393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.