These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16157327)

  • 41. The interaction of visual and linguistic saliency during syntactic ambiguity resolution.
    Coco MI; Keller F
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2015; 68(1):46-74. PubMed ID: 25176109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. A hierarchical linear modeling analysis of working memory and implicit prosody in the resolution of adjunct attachment ambiguity.
    Traxler MJ
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2009 Oct; 38(5):491-509. PubMed ID: 19377881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Predictors of verb-mediated anticipatory eye movements in the visual world.
    Hintz F; Meyer AS; Huettig F
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Sep; 43(9):1352-1374. PubMed ID: 28287762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Preschoolers use phrasal prosody online to constrain syntactic analysis.
    de Carvalho A; Dautriche I; Christophe A
    Dev Sci; 2016 Mar; 19(2):235-50. PubMed ID: 25872796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Prosodic influences on the resolution of temporary ambiguity during on-line sentence processing.
    Nagel HN; Shapiro LP; Tuller B; Nawy R
    J Psycholinguist Res; 1996 Mar; 25(2):319-44. PubMed ID: 8667301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Processing the universal quantifier during sentence comprehension: ERP evidence.
    Jiang X; Tan Y; Zhou X
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 Jul; 47(8-9):1799-815. PubMed ID: 19428412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. The Interaction of Linguistic and Visual Cues for the Processing of Case in Russian by Russian-German Bilinguals: An Eye Tracking Study.
    Minor S; Mitrofanova N; Westergaard M
    Top Cogn Sci; 2024 Feb; ():. PubMed ID: 38380798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Eye movements during spoken word recognition in Russian children.
    Sekerina IA; Brooks PJ
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2007 Sep; 98(1):20-45. PubMed ID: 17560596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Preschoolers' appreciation of speaker vocal affect as a cue to referential intent.
    Berman JM; Chambers CG; Graham SA
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2010 Oct; 107(2):87-99. PubMed ID: 20553796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Give and take: syntactic priming during spoken language comprehension.
    Thothathiri M; Snedeker J
    Cognition; 2008 Jul; 108(1):51-68. PubMed ID: 18258226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Prosodic disambiguation of syntactic structure: for the speaker or for the addressee?
    Kraljic T; Brennan SE
    Cogn Psychol; 2005 Mar; 50(2):194-231. PubMed ID: 15680144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. On-line integration of semantic information from speech and gesture: insights from event-related brain potentials.
    Ozyürek A; Willems RM; Kita S; Hagoort P
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2007 Apr; 19(4):605-16. PubMed ID: 17381252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. The Influence of Focus Marking on Pronoun Resolution in Dialogue Context.
    Blything LP; Järvikivi J; Toth AG; Arnhold A
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():684639. PubMed ID: 34381399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Ongoing eye movements constrain visual perception.
    Hafed ZM; Krauzlis RJ
    Nat Neurosci; 2006 Nov; 9(11):1449-57. PubMed ID: 17028586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Affective and linguistic processing of speech prosody: DC potential studies.
    Pihan H
    Prog Brain Res; 2006; 156():269-84. PubMed ID: 17015085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Spanish-English L2 speakers' use of subcategorization bias information in the resolution of temporary ambiguity during second language reading.
    Dussias PE; Cramer Scaltz TR
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Jul; 128(3):501-13. PubMed ID: 18001689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. The role of iconic gestures in speech disambiguation: ERP evidence.
    Holle H; Gunter TC
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2007 Jul; 19(7):1175-92. PubMed ID: 17583993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Why is that? Structural prediction and ambiguity resolution in a very large corpus of English sentences.
    Roland D; Elman JL; Ferreira VS
    Cognition; 2006 Jan; 98(3):245-72. PubMed ID: 16399264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Semantic evaluation of syntactic structure: evidence from eye movements.
    Frazier L; Carminati MN; Cook AE; Majewski H; Rayner K
    Cognition; 2006 Mar; 99(2):B53-62. PubMed ID: 16115615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Actions and affordances in syntactic ambiguity resolution.
    Chambers CG; Tanenhaus MK; Magnuson JS
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2004 May; 30(3):687-96. PubMed ID: 15099136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.