160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16157438)
1. A randomized clinical trial on proximal contacts of posterior composites.
Loomans BA; Opdam NJ; Roeters FJ; Bronkhorst EM; Burgersdijk RC; Dörfer CE
J Dent; 2006 Apr; 34(4):292-7. PubMed ID: 16157438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Handling protocol of posterior composites--part 3: matrix systems.
Strydom C
SADJ; 2006 Feb; 61(1):18, 20-1. PubMed ID: 16562614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Restoration techniques and marginal overhang in Class II composite resin restorations.
Loomans BA; Opdam NJ; Roeters FJ; Bronkhorst EM; Huysmans MC
J Dent; 2009 Sep; 37(9):712-7. PubMed ID: 19524348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of proximal contacts of Class II resin composite restorations in vitro.
Loomans BA; Opdam NJ; Roeters FJ; Bronkhorst EM; Burgersdijk RC
Oper Dent; 2006; 31(6):688-93. PubMed ID: 17153978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Clinical evaluation of direct cuspal coverage with posterior composite resin restorations.
Deliperi S; Bardwell DN
J Esthet Restor Dent; 2006; 18(5):256-65; discussion 266-7. PubMed ID: 16987320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The effect of proximal contour on marginal ridge fracture of Class II composite resin restorations.
Loomans BA; Roeters FJ; Opdam NJ; Kuijs RH
J Dent; 2008 Oct; 36(10):828-32. PubMed ID: 18621458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of proximal contact tightness of Class II resin composite restorations.
Saber MH; Loomans BA; El Zohairy A; Dörfer CE; El-Badrawy W
Oper Dent; 2010; 35(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 20166409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of proximal contacts of posterior composite restorations with 4 placement techniques.
El-Badrawy WA; Leung BW; El-Mowafy O; Rubo JH; Rubo MH
J Can Dent Assoc; 2003 Mar; 69(3):162-7. PubMed ID: 12622881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinical evaluation of proximal contacts of Class II esthetic direct restorations.
Prakki A; Cilli R; Saad JO; Rodrigues JR
Quintessence Int; 2004; 35(10):785-9. PubMed ID: 15553286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The long-term effect of a composite resin restoration on proximal contact tightness.
Loomans BA; Opdam NJ; Roeters FJ; Bronkhorst EM; Plasschaert AJ
J Dent; 2007 Feb; 35(2):104-8. PubMed ID: 16904254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A randomized clinical trial of cusp-replacing resin composite restorations: efficiency and short-term effectiveness.
Kuijs RH; Fennis WM; Kreulen CM; Roeters FJ; Creugers NH; Burgersdijk RC
Int J Prosthodont; 2006; 19(4):349-54. PubMed ID: 16900817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An up to 3-year randomized clinical study comparing indirect and direct resin composites used to restore worn posterior teeth.
Bartlett D; Sundaram G
Int J Prosthodont; 2006; 19(6):613-7. PubMed ID: 17165303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Class II composite restorations with metallic and translucent matrices: 2-year follow-up findings.
Demarco FF; Cenci MS; Lima FG; Donassollo TA; André Dde A; Leida FL
J Dent; 2007 Mar; 35(3):231-7. PubMed ID: 17034926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The influence of matrix type on the proximal contact in Class II resin composite restorations.
Kampouropoulos D; Paximada C; Loukidis M; Kakaboura A
Oper Dent; 2010; 35(4):454-62. PubMed ID: 20672731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Morphological analysis of proximal contacts in class II direct restorations with 3D image reconstruction.
Chuang SF; Su KC; Wang CH; Chang CH
J Dent; 2011 Jun; 39(6):448-56. PubMed ID: 21504778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Microtensile bond strengths to cavity floor dentin in indirect composite restorations using resin coating.
Okuda M; Nikaido T; Maruoka R; Foxton RM; Tagami J
J Esthet Restor Dent; 2007; 19(1):38-46; discussion 47-8. PubMed ID: 17244149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A clinical evaluation of posterior composite restorations: 17-year findings.
da Rosa Rodolpho PA; Cenci MS; Donassollo TA; Loguércio AD; Demarco FF
J Dent; 2006 Aug; 34(7):427-35. PubMed ID: 16314023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. One-year comparison of metallic and translucent matrices in Class II composite resin restorations.
Cenci MS; Demarco FF; Pereira CL; Lund RG; de Carvalho RM
Am J Dent; 2007 Feb; 20(1):41-5. PubMed ID: 17380807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Clinical evaluation of composite and compomer restorations in primary teeth: 24-month results.
Pascon FM; Kantovitz KR; Caldo-Teixeira AS; Borges AF; Silva TN; Puppin-Rontani RM; Garcia-Godoy F
J Dent; 2006 Jul; 34(6):381-8. PubMed ID: 16242232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Direct posterior restorations using a nanoparticle composite: layering and finishing procedures.
Bhoolabhai S
Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2005 Mar; 17(2):111-5. PubMed ID: 15918304
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
