205 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16157441)
1. Effects of stop-signal modality on the N2/P3 complex elicited in the stop-signal paradigm.
Ramautar JR; Kok A; Ridderinkhof KR
Biol Psychol; 2006 Apr; 72(1):96-109. PubMed ID: 16157441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The auditory-evoked N2 and P3 components in the stop-signal task: indices of inhibition, response-conflict or error-detection?
Dimoska A; Johnstone SJ; Barry RJ
Brain Cogn; 2006 Nov; 62(2):98-112. PubMed ID: 16814442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effects of stop-signal probability in the stop-signal paradigm: the N2/P3 complex further validated.
Ramautar JR; Kok A; Ridderinkhof KR
Brain Cogn; 2004 Nov; 56(2):234-52. PubMed ID: 15518938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. ERP components associated with successful and unsuccessful stopping in a stop-signal task.
Kok A; Ramautar JR; De Ruiter MB; Band GP; Ridderinkhof KR
Psychophysiology; 2004 Jan; 41(1):9-20. PubMed ID: 14692996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Behavioural and ERP indices of response inhibition during a Stop-signal task in children with two subtypes of Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder.
Johnstone SJ; Barry RJ; Clarke AR
Int J Psychophysiol; 2007 Oct; 66(1):37-47. PubMed ID: 17604142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Dynamics of response-conflict monitoring and individual differences in response control and behavioral control: an electrophysiological investigation using a stop-signal task.
Stahl J; Gibbons H
Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Mar; 118(3):581-96. PubMed ID: 17188565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effects of varying stop-signal probability on ERPs in the stop-signal task: do they reflect variations in inhibitory processing or simply novelty effects?
Dimoska A; Johnstone SJ
Biol Psychol; 2008 Mar; 77(3):324-36. PubMed ID: 18096294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Electrophysiological activity underlying inhibitory control processes in normal adults.
Schmajuk M; Liotti M; Busse L; Woldorff MG
Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(3):384-95. PubMed ID: 16095637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Sensory MEG responses predict successful and failed inhibition in a stop-signal task.
Boehler CN; Münte TF; Krebs RM; Heinze HJ; Schoenfeld MA; Hopf JM
Cereb Cortex; 2009 Jan; 19(1):134-45. PubMed ID: 18440947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Neural correlates of successful and partial inhibitions in children: an ERP study.
Cragg L; Fox A; Nation K; Reid C; Anderson M
Dev Psychobiol; 2009 Nov; 51(7):533-43. PubMed ID: 19685486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effects of stop signal modality, stop signal intensity and tracking method on inhibitory performance as determined by use of the stop signal paradigm.
van der Schoot M; Licht R; Horsley TM; Sergeant JA
Scand J Psychol; 2005 Aug; 46(4):331-41. PubMed ID: 16014077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Neural mechanisms underlying trait impulsivity in non-clinical adults: stop-signal performance and event-related potentials.
Dimoska A; Johnstone SJ
Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry; 2007 Mar; 31(2):443-54. PubMed ID: 17175083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Individual stopping times and cognitive control: converging evidence for the stop signal task from a continuous tracking paradigm.
Morein-Zamir S; Meiran N
Q J Exp Psychol A; 2003 Apr; 56(3):469-89. PubMed ID: 12745844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effects of pre-stimulus processing on subsequent events in a warned Go/NoGo paradigm: response preparation, execution and inhibition.
Smith JL; Johnstone SJ; Barry RJ
Int J Psychophysiol; 2006 Aug; 61(2):121-33. PubMed ID: 16214250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Dissociable brain mechanisms underlying the conscious and unconscious control of behavior.
van Gaal S; Lamme VA; Fahrenfort JJ; Ridderinkhof KR
J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 Jan; 23(1):91-105. PubMed ID: 20175675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Long latency components of the visually evoked potential in man: effects of aging.
Beck EC; Swanson C; Dustman RE
Exp Aging Res; 1980 Dec; 6(6):523-45. PubMed ID: 7215409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Principal components analysis of Laplacian waveforms as a generic method for identifying ERP generator patterns: I. Evaluation with auditory oddball tasks.
Kayser J; Tenke CE
Clin Neurophysiol; 2006 Feb; 117(2):348-68. PubMed ID: 16356767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Visual signal detection measured by event-related potentials.
Hunter M; Turner A; Fulham WR
Brain Cogn; 2001 Aug; 46(3):342-56. PubMed ID: 11487284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Modality-independent processes in cued motor preparation revealed by cortical potentials.
Diaconescu AO; Kovacevic N; McIntosh AR
Neuroimage; 2008 Sep; 42(3):1255-65. PubMed ID: 18625564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The pure electrophysiology of stopping.
Bekker EM; Kenemans JL; Hoeksma MR; Talsma D; Verbaten MN
Int J Psychophysiol; 2005 Feb; 55(2):191-8. PubMed ID: 15649550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
