These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16157668)

  • 1. GC-biased segregation of noncoding polymorphisms in Drosophila.
    Galtier N; Bazin E; Bierne N
    Genetics; 2006 Jan; 172(1):221-8. PubMed ID: 16157668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. GC-biased gene conversion and selection affect GC content in the Oryza genus (rice).
    Muyle A; Serres-Giardi L; Ressayre A; Escobar J; Glémin S
    Mol Biol Evol; 2011 Sep; 28(9):2695-706. PubMed ID: 21504892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Patterns of polymorphism and divergence from noncoding sequences of Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans: evidence for nonequilibrium processes.
    Kern AD; Begun DJ
    Mol Biol Evol; 2005 Jan; 22(1):51-62. PubMed ID: 15456897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Mutation and selection at silent and replacement sites in the evolution of animal mitochondrial DNA.
    Rand DM; Kann LM
    Genetica; 1998; 102-103(1-6):393-407. PubMed ID: 9720291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Population genomic analysis of base composition evolution in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Poh YP; Ting CT; Fu HW; Langley CH; Begun DJ
    Genome Biol Evol; 2012; 4(12):1245-55. PubMed ID: 23160062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Mutation pressure, natural selection, and the evolution of base composition in Drosophila.
    Akashi H; Kliman RM; Eyre-Walker A
    Genetica; 1998; 102-103(1-6):49-60. PubMed ID: 9720271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Variation in the Intensity of Selection on Codon Bias over Time Causes Contrasting Patterns of Base Composition Evolution in Drosophila.
    Jackson BC; Campos JL; Haddrill PR; Charlesworth B; Zeng K
    Genome Biol Evol; 2017 Jan; 9(1):102-123. PubMed ID: 28082609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Adaptive basis of codon usage in the haploid moss Physcomitrella patens.
    Stenøien HK
    Heredity (Edinb); 2005 Jan; 94(1):87-93. PubMed ID: 15483656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Genomic heterogeneity of background substitutional patterns in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Singh ND; Arndt PF; Petrov DA
    Genetics; 2005 Feb; 169(2):709-22. PubMed ID: 15520267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Local changes in GC/AT substitution biases and in crossover frequencies on Drosophila chromosomes.
    Takano-Shimizu T
    Mol Biol Evol; 2001 Apr; 18(4):606-19. PubMed ID: 11264413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Intron length evolution in Drosophila.
    Presgraves DC
    Mol Biol Evol; 2006 Nov; 23(11):2203-13. PubMed ID: 16923822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Molecular evolution between Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans: reduced codon bias, faster rates of amino acid substitution, and larger proteins in D. melanogaster.
    Akashi H
    Genetics; 1996 Nov; 144(3):1297-307. PubMed ID: 8913769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Non-neutral processes drive the nucleotide composition of non-coding sequences in Drosophila.
    Haddrill PR; Charlesworth B
    Biol Lett; 2008 Aug; 4(4):438-41. PubMed ID: 18505714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Deterministic mutation rate variation in the human genome.
    Smith NG; Webster MT; Ellegren H
    Genome Res; 2002 Sep; 12(9):1350-6. PubMed ID: 12213772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Adaptation or biased gene conversion? Extending the null hypothesis of molecular evolution.
    Galtier N; Duret L
    Trends Genet; 2007 Jun; 23(6):273-7. PubMed ID: 17418442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Molecular evolution of the histone 3 multigene family in the Drosophila melanogaster species subgroup.
    Matsuo Y
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2000 Sep; 16(3):339-43. PubMed ID: 10991787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Population genomic analysis reveals no evidence for GC-biased gene conversion in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Robinson MC; Stone EA; Singh ND
    Mol Biol Evol; 2014 Feb; 31(2):425-33. PubMed ID: 24214536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Nonallelic gene conversion is not GC-biased in Drosophila or primates.
    Assis R; Kondrashov AS
    Mol Biol Evol; 2012 May; 29(5):1291-5. PubMed ID: 22160767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Nucleotide substitution pattern in rice paralogues: implication for negative correlation between the synonymous substitution rate and codon usage bias.
    Shi X; Wang X; Li Z; Zhu Q; Tang W; Ge S; Luo J
    Gene; 2006 Jul; 376(2):199-206. PubMed ID: 16644142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Analysis of correlation of local GC level in human protein coding genes].
    Chen XG; Hu J; Yang X
    Yi Chuan; 2008 Sep; 30(9):1169-74. PubMed ID: 18779175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.